Olson v. Commissioner

Sidney L. Olson and Miriam K. Olson, et al., ¹ Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Olson v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 1713-65, 1714-65, 1715-65, 1716-65, 3328-65

United States Tax Court

49 T.C. 84; 1967 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 21;

November 6, 1967, Filed

---

James C. Herndon and Sam D. Bartlo, for the petitioners.

Buckley D. Sowards, for the respondent.

Withey, Judge.

---

WITHEY

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

The petitioners on October 17, 1967, filed a motion, which respondent has approved, to revise the opinion () filed herein on September 21, 1967.

As we understand the motion, the parties are now in agreement that the distribution by Cleveland of the 12 shares of Buffalo stock of which Sidal became the equitable owner but for which stock certificates were issued directly to Albert Schultz and Sidney Olson constituted dividends to those two persons only to the extent that the fair market value of such shares did not exceed the accumulated earnings and profits of Sidal of $ 78,648.15 at December 31, 1961. Accordingly the motion is granted in the following respects:

(1) to change page 856, the last line of paragraph (5) of the headnote, from "a total of $ 90,648.15" to "$ 78,648.15";

(2) to change page 865, fourth paragraph, line 4, from "(2), assuming a constructive distribution" to "(2), assuming a taxable constructive distribution"; and

(3) to change page 871, second paragraph, last line, from "a total of $ 90,648.15" to "$ 78,648.15."

---

Footnotes

• 1. Cases of the following petitioners are consolidated herewith: Philip I. Olson and Audrey B. Olson, docket No. 1714-65; Albert L. Schultz and Janet A. Schultz, docket No. 1715-65; Irving J. Olson and Ruth B. Olson, docket No. 1716-67; and Sidal Corp., docket No. 3328-65.↩