In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-14-00220-CR
____________________
JOSHUA JERROD THOMAS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 11-12337
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury convicted Joshua Jerrod Thomas (Thomas) of murder, a first degree
felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02(b)(1) (West 2011). The jury assessed
punishment at sixty years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,
Institutional Division. Thomas timely filed a notice of appeal.
Thomas’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that presents counsel’s
professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.
1
Crim. App. 1978). On April 7, 2015, we granted an extension of time for Thomas
to file a pro se brief. Thomas filed a pro se brief in response, which raised a
number of issues for appeal.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has held that we need not address the
merits of issues raised in Anders briefs or pro se responses. See Bledsoe v. State,
178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Rather, we may determine that
(1) “the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that [the
appellate court] has reviewed the record and finds no reversible error” or that (2)
“arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that
new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues.” Id. (citations omitted).
We have independently reviewed the entire appellate record in this matter,
as well as all briefs, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues
support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new
counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511
(Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 1
AFFIRMED.
_________________________
LEANNE JOHNSON
Justice
1
Thomas may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for
discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
2
Submitted on April 9, 2015
Opinion Delivered September 9, 2015
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.
3