IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NOS. WR-62,099-04 & WR-62,099-05
IN RE ROBERT LYNN PRUETT, Applicant
ON COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR TO FILE A MOTION
FOR STAY OF EXECUTION PENDING THE DISPOSITION OF AN
APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED ON APPLICANT
PRUETT’S CASE FROM CAUSE NO. B-01-M015-PR-B
IN THE 156 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
BEE COUNTY
N EWELL, J., filed a concurring statement in which A LCALA, J., joined.
I join the Court’s order to grant applicant Robert Pruett’s attorney David Dow leave
to appear before this Court in order to represent applicant in these two numbered cases. I
write separately to address the timing of this Court’s order. Given the timing of this Court’s
order, I would suspend the requirement that applicant’s attorney provide a detailed
explanation showing good cause as it relates to filing these pleadings in applicant’s case.
However, applicant’s counsel is free to include the timing of this Court’s order as part of any
statement showing good cause that he might need to file in the event that these pleadings are
Pruett Concurring Statement Page 2
untimely.
With these thoughts I concur.
Filed: April 20, 2015
Do Not Publish