* Mr. Maurice Mitchell,Pro-se *
Specialize Legal technician[SLT1
SOUTHERN CAREER INSTITUTE
Paraleqal School of 'Arts' & ‘Sciences'
[P\aralegal No%Y[P\+?g-91694Z
William J. Estelle Unit
TDGJ, I-D No# 648121
~_ 264 E\,M.=_~3478; __
Huntsville, Texas 77320
2014
maxim t
PrtsziJu§ioeLe$;e MARCH 16, 2015
Hon; Ahel acosta,clerk
Texas Court of Crimlnal appeals
P. O. Box 12308, Capital Station
RE: MAURICE MITCHELYj .V 'STATE OF' TEXAS ’{'Tiii?'?iii"i'”ifF*ii'f"f!(iiiiii¥
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS- CORPUS
WRIT NO% WR-13, 573- 09
Trial court Cause No% 98-F-O331- 202
Dear Mr. Acosta,
1 pray this~ letter has found you and your immediate family:members to~
be well, in the best_of.God‘s healthh_care and spirit. 4
Enclosed please find ny brief pleading to be.placed before the court
for consideration. ` -
The Bowie County off1c1als have apparently respond to the court's ORDER,
and 1 have no idea what documents were forwa1ded to the court, or whether
1‘?
\\c
or not I should respond.
Please place.the enclosure before the court at_your earliest conveniences.
Thankinq you in.advance, I remain;
/ ' » f
Respectfully;'
1 , .. 1 -- REcE\vED,_\N 1
MAR 19 2215
Abe\ Ac<')sta, G\e“\
>¢-
* ' IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL;APPEALS
' 0F 'rEXg._s_
No.~ wR-13,*573-09'
Exparte; MAURICE MITCHELL
1 ou APPLI<:ATIGN FoR wRH‘ 00 HABEAS 00RPus_‘,', 1110 EXgr-.'Prlow
vERNoNS ANNGI‘ATED, 0000 0F _cR_];MLNAL PROGEDURE.S 11. 07 4(a)(ii-)
The records .show that non OCIUBER 20312014 Ihe Applicant served
ZOZn‘ Criminalh:District. Court of Bowie;€uunty;.fexarkana, Texas an Appli~
cation for Habeasi€orpms1Relief..Because=:the -District .Court failed to re-
spond in accordanee; with. the sstatue,§applicant;filedfthe.application1in
this court=_seekir-_lg,',_;,.,':€)l:~]';ginalj'_;Jm-:»J'.sdic:ti-on'.'..._1.1't '
WRIT ®F MANDAMUS; and on EEBRUARY,O&; 20151;§ORDER1.issued“’upon the ZOan.
Criminal'.DistricF~Sourt to fSubmi.t'the records“onysueh habeas corpus appli-
. cation» i;e; a timely iiled 3rder which desig nat=* 1§ues1to'be investiga-
ted(s ee MCCREE:' w ~HAMBTON 824.JS-W.2d 578, 579 flex. Crim. App 1992); or
istating that Relator Yhas; noth;§i¥ed§janjapptication;for.a writ of habeas¢
corpus in Bowie Gounty'..] h l w ", 7 " bn . l m
NOT[CE: §aOn 'MARCH 09, 2015~ [A]pplicant was in receipt of.a white
Post Card from [the 'clerk{sjoffice’ofdthis»court bearing the.cause number
[98€0331-2028]10§WR¥13;573¢10]6$tat1ng§JVON`THISyDAY,'(2/23/15):the:appiica-
tion for 11.07'Writ of Habeas Corpus has been received. and presented to
the Court.'"
\Subsequently non MARCH\lO, 2015 applicant Was.in;receipt of a\SECOND
White Post Card:from“thejclerk{s#officenon MARCH 10, 2014a150 dated EEBRUARYH
232 ZOlS_Note;, the "first NOTICE was not post marked in any manner'bv U.S¢Y
\Postal Servi¢e);. the S SCOND Notice is Post:marked) statingx "'GN this day,
theasupplemental;clerkis record, in response1 to the 'order issued by this
\"\ '.
This [CJourt:;construed1wapplicant’s;iapplication. as a PEIITION FOR 1 1
.-\
Court, has ';been received and presented to t e 60urt1`,".'
Note; 1.:'1-"1¢1-13::':'pos.tv 'card, bears'_ the..:tria=]. court .1number as-[93-E`-O331-
11202] and Writ._.;nilr`mber 'as~-:,EWR-`13,57_3-’09.]. 1
z ' "* 1'\_`_APPti,cmr~.'-s'.'111101111<1= z n
Ihe .State refu"sed.. to [RESP.OND]*.;.to.:applicant;{“s~ .initial_ application which
appears to reiy.-'; on'd"authori‘ties 1 .-.that' 7zar:e.:,c:-learly.. d-isposi‘tive.ot`. the .‘IWO
[2] issues presented by the-::' applicant namely1']`:XPARTE"`BARE`IELD"'097 S`.`~.W. 2d . 1_
420 [Tex. Cr. App. 1985] Contro};ingas to tihe first issue), and IORDM V_. t '_ _
~STATE 255 5‘“‘.359 285 [Tex er APP" 2008] appears to ..be_. 1.[1d]iSpQSitiVe of
the SE'. COND issue~raised in the application.
Your" Applicant finds7 himself Perpi~_xed~- and subjected _t§ 'C.onster- q
_nation' due to his -- enabiiity. to .-see, observe, or ré\z`iewny of the records
(férwarded to this:' court franz Bowie Gounty)
_ `Makers' to make;. ;;-1'a gust1 decision ;and;. to :gran_t' applicant any 1:and` ail: relief '.'i' '
onur applicant DOES NGT KNOW shat records were sent; or whether - ~-
summit he need to reply, or [;R]espond to the records sent in by the State.
l"l` DO.ES `1.5.`.`IOI` APPE'AR UNDER 'ANY.'. L[RCUM§[`AN""S that the Sta'te would1
REJO\M..NJ IHAT RELIEF SHOULD BE. GRANI~`ED, therefore applicant is at a lose.
WHERE£"ORE:; .11premis'es.1Cons~idered;l`:;.applican:tr;*.-»PRAY," .thi's:':l-Ionorab]ie Court " '
of Criminal apneais :wiii make a determination as to whether or not appl;i_-
cent needs to . mate 11
:";:§§rep].y, as to any adverse contentions placed before
this court by' the~:state.
Applicacrt`-;: places:. hi»s=11 'trust' i.r the "jurisprudence'ot` these 'Key;.;1
that fHe] is ';'=1'30 ]ustly"_,j":ue according to clearlyrestablished :E`edera`] ~£Law
as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States
" CERTIFICATE/OF\SERV[CE *
_ -1" . l 7¢ `: ertl Fy that» ima true and correct
' copy -of