mws (tn-ts
ORIGINAL APPEAL NO- 02-15-00193-CR
02-15-00194-CR
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OCT 23 2015
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
Abel Acosta, Clerk
FILED IN
STANLEY DALE SELF,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPELLANT
OCT 23 2015
VS.
Abel Acosta, Cierk
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
ON APPEAL FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT
OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NO'S. F-90-478-E & F-90-572-E
SUBMITTED BY: STANLEY DALE SELF
POLUNSKY UNIT
3872 Fm 350 South
Livingston, Texas 77351
INTERESTED PARTIES
Stanley Dale Self, Appearing Pro Se
Polunsky Unit
3872 Fm 350 South
Livingston, Texas 77351
Honorable Margaret Barnes District Judge
367th District Court
Denton County Courthouse
1450 E. McKinny
Denton, Texas 76201
Catherine Luft, Assistant District Attorney
Assistant District Attorney
1450 East McKinney
Denton, Texas 76209
State Prosecuting Attorney State Prosecutor
Post Office Box 13046
Austin, Texas 78711-3046
-1--
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Interested Parties i
Index of Authorities ii
Constitutional and Statutory Provisions- ii
Statement Regarding Oral Argument 1
Statement of the Case ....... X
Statement of the Procedural History 2
Question(s) Presented for Review 2
Argument • , 2,3
Prayer 3
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
Martinez v Ryan,
566 U.S. , 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2013) ,,,,,,,,,/,////////// 2
Mo ore v Beard, 42 F.Supp. 3d 624 (Middle Dist. Penn. 2014) 3
Self v State, 860 S.W.2d 261 (Tex. App. 2nd Dist. 1991 P.ref'd) 2
Trevino v Thaleg, 133 S.Ct. 1911 (2013),,,,,,,,,,,,////// «hw ^^-"
procedure article 11.07, we have no jurisdiction over matters relating to
postconviction applications, including requests for appointment of counsel. See
Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West 2015); Cooper v. State, No. 02-15-
00145-CR, 2015 WL 3799069, at *1 & nn.2, 4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 18,
2015, no pet. h.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (disposing of
attempted appeal of trial court's order denying motion for appointment of
postconviction habeas counsel).
We informed appellant that unless he or any party desiring to continue the
appeals filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals, we would
dismiss-the appeals for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response, but it
does not show grounds for continuing the appeals. Therefore, we dismiss the
appeals for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
50NNIE SUDDERTH
JUSTICE
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT AND SUDDERTH, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: July 23, 2015
CAUSE NO'S. F-90-478-E
F-90-572-E
STANLEY DALE SELF § IN THE 367TH DISTRIC ^ ^
§
§ % V
VS. § OF
§
THE STATE OF TEXAS § DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER
Came to be hear'd Petitioner/ Stanley Dale Self's Motion
for the Appointment of Counsel for habeas corpus purposes, after
reviewing the Motion, the law, and the citations of authority,
the Court is of the opinion that the same should be
( ) GRANTED ( •) DENIED
Done this '&*) day of Ap*a<£ 2ois
PreaiSUficf/J'S^S,' 367 district
Court, Denton County, Texas
ATTORNEY APPOINTED
APPENDIX A (2)