IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
AUSTIN TEXAS
RECEIVED IN
APPLICATION NO· =-------------------·----.C.OURT OF CRIIVIII\!Al APPEALS
---------------------------------------------------------------Atltli~-2rn5------
WRIT MANDAMUS SOUGHT
Abe\ Acosta, Clerk
338th JUDICIAL· DISTRICT COURT ·OF
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
TRIAL COURT NUMBER: 1150417-B
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS NO.: WR-81,154-03
----------------------------------------------------------------~---------------
WR I T MA N D A MU S
To The Justice of Said Court:
I, JOSE CASTillLLO LEDEZMA , Movant pro se seeks to entreat this court to review
his writ of mandamus and submit to the mandates of the Texas Constitution and as
to the Constitution of the UNITED STATES.
Ministerial function as to which there is no occasion to use judgment o~ to
use discretion. BLACK~'JSb:bA:W DICTIONARY, ~th. edition.
This court has jurisdiction pursuant to the TEX.GOV'T.CODE ANN.sec.·:22.221(b)
(Vernons) vest wmthin this court the power to issue all writs of mandamus against
a state judge.
"A•~"wi?tt of mandamus will not lie to correct a merely erroneous or voidable ·;
order of the trial court, but w~ll iie to correct one which the trial j~dge had
no power to render. Urbish vs. 127th Judicial Dist. Court, 708 S.W.2d. 429, 431
(Tex.1986), citing State vs. Ferguson, 133 Tex. 60, 63, 125 S.W.2d. 272, 274 (
1939).
01 of 03
ENTITLEMENT TO MANDAMUS RELIEF
STATE OF TEXAS REQUIREMENTS:
Per Ex parte Aviles, 78 S.W.3d. 677, (Tex.App.-Austin 2002) at, Pg. 685.,[11-
13] To establish entitlement to mandamus relief, must demonstrate that -
(1) the act sought to be compelled is purely ministerial; and
(2) that there is no adequate remedy at law. Stotts vs. Wisser, 894 S.W.2d. 366
, 367 (Tex.Crim.App. 1995). Although the STATE argues otherwise, entry of a judgm-
~jr':is a ministerfual act. George, 913 S.W.2d. 523, fa.u, 526).
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS:
"Before mandamus may be issued, three elements must co-exist; -
(1) clear right in plaintiff to relief sou~ht;
(2) clear d~ty on part of defendant to do act in question; and
(3) no other adequate remedy available " Carter vs. Seamans, 411 F.2d.
767, 11 ~!¥rt.den 1 d., 90 S.Ct. 953, 39 U.S. 941, 25 L.Ed.2d. 121; Randall Dvr-:Wolcott
M.D., P.A., vs. 8P.belinus, 365 F.3d. 757 (C.A. 5 (TX) 2011).
PARTIES
JOSE CASTILLO LEDEZMA, Plaintiff/Movant/Applicant/Relator pro se
338th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS (STATE OF TEXAS), Defendant/
Respondant,( ...
ACT SOUGHT
The act sought is mandated by the State and Federal Constitutions and the Texas
Code of Criminal Procedures, art. 1.08 therefore it is mandatory to act upon the
writ of right within the capacity of ministerial duty within Trial Court Number:
1150417-B and within Writ of habeas corpus number; WR-81,154-03. DO NOT SUSPEND
THE WRIT OF RIGHT. Review it and correct the errors therein are be held liable on
failure to 'act' under the mandate as prescribed by constitutional law.
02 of 03
1. CLEAR RIGHT: Writ of right (habeas corpus) is a clear right.
2. CLEAR DUTY/MINISTERIAL: Obeying the MANDATES of the State and Federal Con.:;t:~
Constitution is a 'Duty Imposed'.
3. NO OTHER REMEDY AT LAW: When the Writ of Right has been 'SUSPENDED'; by the
very authority that is to enforce the writ of right
then there is no other remedy for relief upon the
grounds within the writ itself. Mandamus should be
issued. And writ of habeas corpus.reviewed.
Dated this the 17 day of August , 2015
Sincerely:
JO f!ASTILLO LEDEZMA, pro se
JOHN .M. WYNNE UNIT/TDCJ#:
810 F.M.
HUNTSVILLE, TX.
UNSWORN DECLARATION OF INMATE OATH
I, JOSE CASTILLO LEDEZMA , pro se, TDCJ#: 01475537 , is incarcerated in the
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, at
the JOHN M. WYNNE UNIT, Located within Walker County, Texas and does DECLARE,
CERTIFY, VERIFY and/or STATE) under penalty of perjury that the above is true '"
and correct. Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem. Code § 132.
Dated this the 17 day of August , 2015
Sincerely:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, DO SWEAR, DECLARE AND VERIFY, CERTIFY THAT A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE
SAME WAS MAIL ON OR ABOUT THE DAY OF 20
03 of 03
,..
·I-
IN THE COURT OF irCRIMINAL APPEALS
AUSTIN TEXAS
Ex parte
LEDEZMA, JOSE CASTILLO Trial Court No.; 1150417-B
Writ No.: WR-81,154-03
MOVANTS WRITTEN OBJECTION TO THE SUSPEN$ION QF THE WRIT HABEAS CORPUS
To Whom These Presents Shall Come; Greetings; Take Notice, THAT:
It is paramount that the judicial branch of the STATE OF TEXAS submit and obey
the mandates of the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE of July 4, 1776; CONSTillTUTION OF
THE UNITED STATES, (1787);Jas amended (1791) by the BILL OF RIGHTS- FIRST, SECOND
, THIRD, FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, SEVENTH, EIGHTH, NINETH, and TENTH Articles of
Amendments..
Pursuant to the STATE OF TEXAS, CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURES article 1.08 that
appertains to the 'Habeas Corpus' clearly mandates that, •:'J!]he writ of habeas corpus
shall not be suspended.
The 338th JUD:J;GIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. in mHE ABOVE TITLED
Trial Court Number did cause to 'SUSPEND' the writ of habeas corpus filed therein
with the [pre]sumption that it has the authority to 'SUSPEND' the writ of right of
Article I., §12, TEXAS CONSTITUTON and Article I.. §9, cl.2, D:ONSTIDTUTitiJN[:;QF THE
UNITED STATES if it does not meet article 11.07, §4.(;a1~(c) and this Court of the
Criminal appeals, AUstin Texas has agreed. Thus accepting liability for the actual
'SUSPENSION' of the 'guaranteed enforcement of the mandate' that the Judicia~ branch
of the STATE OF TEXAS government is to submit its authority to and obey.
By the factual 'SUSPENSION OF' THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS' in this matter it hA-s
caused to bring A.bout a. remedy that can not be used for it has been bar by the
[prelsmnption that the STATE OF TEXAS Judicial Branch of the government has the
authority to 'SUSPEND'.
01 of 02
...
CONCLUSION
IT IS THEREFORE, set forth according to the Writ of Mandamus being that there is
no remedy available hereby demands that duty is performed and files this attached
Mandamus seeking mandated dut;r hy and throtirgn the State and Fec'leral Constl tution.
Dated this tbe 17 day of August , 2015
Sincerely:
LEDEZMA, ant pro se
JOHN M. WYNNE 1JNJT/TDCJ. 01475537
810 F.M. 2821
HUNTSVILLE .. TX. 77349
UNSWORN DECLARATION OF INMATE OATH
I, JOSE CASTII.LO LEDEZMA , Movant pro se, TDCJ#: 01475537 , is incarcerated in
the TEXAS DEI\PRTMENT OF' CRIMINAL ,TIJ8TICE - CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONAl· DIVISTON., at
the JOHN M. WYNNE UNIT, located within Walker County, Texas and doesnDECLARE,
CERTIFY, VERIFY and/or STATE) under penalty of perjury that the above is true and
correct. TEX.CIV.PRAC. & REM.CODE § 132 .
Dated th~.s the 17 day of August 2015
pro se
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, DO SWEAR. DECLARE AND VERIFY, CERTIFY THAT A TRUE AND CORRECT'.!.'COPY OF THE
SAME WAS MAIL ON OR ABOUT THE DAY OF ' 20
02 of 02