Watson, Van Jr.

C:.l er-K _ J Cour+ of C,i-rnlllu! ,4rpeti. {~ o ~ ( ext<:.s p,D, 2, 0 x 1Z._30f6 -Cap,fa 13-fq-f,o~~t A\,{j t i /lJ I ex u~ 7 g 7 t t · \ .Se/p-fel'llber tt1 ZJJtS · ·.. Re: f-e lafod briJ itltilAfl>l OUilr'P Procedural.5furrdC!c~-JJ - t) f re u i ew :)e f !0 rf?r / Vl fi ti) vt e -2 rJ. K.e,n/1 e/; I 2 S, Ct. 5ftf (197 2) .. Pi fuse f! /e or~d britJr;. fo C-ou'4 iPI1fl'leJ_ittfe _ ft.e ~fteotf, o PI .SI()_ f-f.. r.r If 111:J CD.tl 5 i d er tMr) 1 .s s u e o rr-u. l , ~ . thafAK.- you /VI. aduance-fov- fOttr /(fYlJ uP1d ~ ro frlJJ +- a ffevt f, ·p r/1_ i ~ tt, ,-5 (11alffr. :5 /11 cP re It1 , RECE~VED ~N lJ ~ [RJ~, 6b . COURT OF CRIMINAl APPEALS SEP 14 2015 UaV\ i1Jaf5ot/1,0r. c_. 1. TE~R ELi tJt1 r, f Abei~cos~a, Clewk !300 {;/Ill, 6S~ f( .'l .s+r i VL_J en -1 ..s-1: 4 n J o "d-" 'vt rAJ:. It' r;. J "''~!/ drot'-leJ bY o. /ec!Pyer. t-ur#e--: i f +he Cou.r+ C4r1 r-eo..5ot?ably c.nns+.ru e ftte f I~~~ 1 "J s +o 5 fde a u c. II 0 c Ia 1 .rv~ u{Jt>VI l)}l.ic~ u /1 f!J4f1 f could preoat!J d Jhould, Jo 5D duf 1 -1-e afly f&., lure. +o c, fe pro per au H oolf 1 c.tt'\.fuJSiofl o-F I ey r; I +h eor-1 e 5 tx- pn r1 c 1} ds) poor- LDV\5fr~c f,·oYJ Dr /o,c!< of fOrm. An I< e l d tl r {, le5 +!.\1' s Drlj iFI c. ( (I{__(, !tOt1 FOr Wri f, Of fYI a>'~clc..rYluS, fJuou c. Yl ~ to Ar-1 ide /I. D1 5e chot1 3(cJ o+ +he.- I Code o{ CnMirlti/ Procedure1 cnvl eJ(Gd (Vle'l-1 of Cn1'1i nd Ju.Jfice aY/d i5. v. (\ ~ E't- ('; ':J pro-se a" J d 0 ej not hu ve G. +' r f'//1 KfiDU) -wjf ~ L uJ O.'l J c;; u f~ o... ,·-t' ·O I c. ""' lvt_c u J e cJ a+ i':_e C, /. It; .'::- !!#[ri'! ~-1-:,~ I )OD frVI roSS R._a~ ht'/J/l!IL ANifALS of1('t.ll(,. ·f Ak~PG ( ;~ +o +1,/:vHonorCtble uur-+ fhe UVJ en Cf- -lhcf I - t 6~~ er ~ 1-t ((·fJ 0ll niEL iJIJT((TCT CLtlT () t-/-(AI Ct..,/ J"',eYI flo~ p,·tv + I +~ u f ~~ ved 110 wr-o"!f ~ '"'j espec_,c.fiJ Q ra;':J t. rrr c; Jj !!'old fef//Lakv "'th ed~/':l ~ K, .J Perform,-,cf fp ho~~s alfer-ffi_e u l- 1epA ,.o11. • tV~> If~ i Ill); t r,. \e.erJ. , "J1~0 il "'~VI) 1-\~ "'-e--t -LIA r c..c.t : ee vJ h I If!___ I{)+ Or I s tt Wu I 7 Yl// fo r Mf- fr~n..J /fJ I If~ I I o-{ fh f~ AfP Ii cui ion fo or ()) r>f cf !Ju be£ S Cor)U.S) /f..'{>_ /f//evYJ(()f'arJdu~ ar;tl A;JAertrJ,x as we II cs ttl! uf~C--ufVleaf_s ttnJ pufrev-s,,./Jp Itt for t 1 u!.J we II C< 5 be udv,.s e.d !l1ay b, Z0/5 te}.for /:Jed ivd{.;.s Coe~.rf A;)piiun+s ~~rpo.sed r-:•1uU,;;s- _ . ,_-,·nJ S o-F fa4-f C\vt cJ CeYI C /u ~ • 011 D-{ LtdAJ t;it/1 cJ Order- _L"' c/uJ;vtj h;j Eth:h;-1- '-sA-c ·.· . , f Ie4..5 e see cA {)Cu me~ f_s t€-ec e ( u e J ; vt Cou 1 f o-f Cr,'~ t'~a/ I AppP.-G l~ !hay I I~ 20 f_) b ~ +h ~ 1-foho;-c;h Je II be I !lco5f~ . c_1 tu I( 1i vz J u /e f-fe r d ({fee). M~ y t_rlzo IS- fo ~ !Je . . Re Iu l-or ('1 q}( ,· "'2. ~; M (} uJure Htuf /tO w {'f+ UJO.j f, led ·i vt +?t.e, C-ou rf c:t"/-er u. _5 e arCh. · _r v1 do~; -:3 ]: u ~. v-t'[J-te~ I/ r?_9 +o Dll-f 5 Cf_,lAt:l rely be /fOIY_ i{\ s ~u._rf. L!:'rft~i ~J. f\ec,e,~r o·f_Wr~ol f-/ahea5. ~ I. fVlt_r+l or~ rt c) ~ea j LJ) he_vv- ~ . If>. I a 't-o r /, h urChfr.s prJ - · ....Lh .C_Llll .., . ..,, 7. ~=-- -~ c....t.tM.eoll-7_5 _; UD '-L I '3--tl u;\-" ~ -e_ 0_A er /( w tOu I d r e (eas e. U..vtd e r Cu us e -fl- IP f? 312_ 6_;. J. otA.Il VVJ fY////5.) oLAf q_f 30 ~ do%~evt/-<5.-, L\. te c e·· f f {or Pu uha 5£ o-f;. b i.s f O.Sf'cl' uJ r ~ f5 5· Ce r h .(; ed 1e Her lo !Dnn ev afl-o r r: ej +{., c, f I ePre .5t!.tlfe1 /(_~ l u fo {' u vt J p f' Ca u.s e 1f: [p CJ2/)If!; m I -Rt ()U f u !Jrdotr ~vtJ. to VI !-;.tt-l~ +o repres£P~ ~fhf,Jo,. Ufl Ju CtJ use .tf- ~ C(q 312 W1 tilrt>u t 1 n fr0r-m 1 vz_J ke I o /-otr -k--_ e drS rn:sf.u I o-F Cau$. B ~ bFOik A-Hj f..o{/j flu_!j e<, _ ~. r.D. &OIL go J.{ z::,- 1-fousfo"'J 1l"ju_:, 77 zgo- I::, 2J . ~ C./Y(, £.r2.fC.#-7()o7 02!0 OOOtf ZS3g lfl30 At+ortt~ 12-on rfu~e_s A.5we.v fo fAe_ ~ourl in --Jalll.UO rtJ Z0, 27fO{) 1/euet/ (Vr-et/l+IO//Itrl_j' +itte_ .IVJ<-fird r.,J,. clvnerd ivorKtr~J fov +he- :;-tafe. fl{ f e tfo.f 7 ' I ' ~ f I i i. v1. . . -,~('-»so v'i c1 Vv-e . +o '11~ flh i.s.. f li J

. UJ e I( tt ~ lJ, s j)os e'cl UJ 1'1 fs on {; f e a+ ffie J-e,{4-S 5k+~ (_4_,wit.br-Ot'(· /his hr;.:s heen C{ -f(tj /111J zo Cjett vs. q 'ld ct lea r-11 I 0-J e_~f_eV'-iet/f. c ~ ~ILJ. deUveJ'Civtce -fre:;,m QddrGf/a~:>lo dVY.fJ5 a"J aecho[ . ?/ea,5 e Ci'J fnct-f +el' rc/L ~~ cA () e,J.s. C(S we., II 4.,.5 lh e d{) CQ, (YL e vv-fs r:_AJ,_W\ b~',"'1 5 u6Jttl' Herl a;zdev- Me. 5-lantA"-~ a fl f2euieuJ .sd /orr~ it.r t{_a.il1~5 v. Ke/l/ier 4f•d f~ke_ vz._of/c-e. ~e r~-+Dif'- ~uS \/e rO \i_r~ /erf/. Q u~ lid C!Q /n . u.~oq wh.'cfA "'- 1-fFI€cffv, I~ Su.bm; Ne.J .... 1/wVt- wtxb( err . . u~VI. uJ o..f soJA) vr · . c, T. I i (C.J!_,{iLL (R3) /J"' 1-4 j ~~{;;';~s;t )l:t;-<, ?) 5 ri 5 .· UJf/iLJJD{fll bEc!_Af.JJ TIO t1' -r,vatro fP4.fso~Jv-.. T/JC~ cJ/j t1- 731()(/lj ,Ot V\ Ivzvn CA. fe LVlCt "-e. k r-~ are f N e 4. v1 d. C()n' e c f v.."' rJ. e " J'0e~ /--/-1, of p'€ ,- :un-1 ·. . j) 7 ~s e ro, 0f//}MJ't I r& _, .' . . . -] . j . . ,).. ,.r {Jo Q) OHicio.l CovA--f 1-c cord . Jc/\ (h t CotJ..d of 4f}eof~ for 1he f;rsf /Jto-fricf of T-e-xas N0 • 0 I ~ I Lj ~ ()()() (pO ~ cR ~ ·~a.~e5 c()d"'-014; "~ c__~..s~ -1:1 &1Zdl 8 j oifi!,_l }".\j cf' vii e'lf tf fklD l '<> Pr; M• r J~Ji(;j ""!e"' f :P' &fq~ I 'V [llofi 0'1 I0 h•.SWI' sS if (p 6j W ( 'ii . (f!oflo>t 1c fldoff J:l- b~~:$1'2.- Prlor tnb-f1 oLt~.b Opinion issued AprillO, 2014 In The QI:ourt of appeal~ For The jftr~t 11Bt~trtct of ~exa~ NO. 01-14-00060-CR VAN WATSON, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the I 80th District Court Trial Court Cause No. 699312 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Van Watson, Jr., pleaded guilty to the felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child and the trial court sentenced appellant to thirty years' confinement. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021 (West S\lPP· 2013); see also In re Watson, No. 01-11-00626-CR, 2011 WL 3820953, at *1 (Tex. App.- Houston pst Dist.) Aug. 25, 20ll, mig. proceeding) (mem. op.~ not cles\gnateclfor publication) (noting that appellant was convicted of felony offense of sexual assault of a child). Appellant later filed a "motion for nunc pro tunc to correct judgment and sentence." The trial court denied the motion and appellant now attempts to appeal from the trial court's order denying his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. We dismiss the appeal. The denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order. See Lozano v. State, No. 01-13-00180-CR, 2013 WL 2106570, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] May 14, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Zelaya v. State, Nos. 0 1"' 11-00977 -CR, 0 1-11-00978-CR, 01-11- 00979-CR, 2013 WL 127439, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 10, 2013, I no pet.) (mem .. op., not designated for publication); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.-Waco 2002, pet. dism'd). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We ~ismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel.consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). \ JUDGMENT Court of ~peal~ jfir~t 1JBigtrirt of ~exa~ NO. 01-14-00060-CR VAN WATSON, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 180th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 699312). The cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on November 26, 2013. After inspecting the record of the court below, it is the opinion of this Court that it has no jurisdiction over the appeal. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed. The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance. Judgment rendered April 10, 2014 . . Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp·. , THE STATE OF TEXAS D.A. LOG NUMBER: 186983 vs. ens TRACIONG NO.: VAN WATSON, JR. SPN: oo932568- BY:DJB DANO: 595 6255 .W. AIRPORT #IOD DOB: BM U-24-52 AGENCY: HPD·' · HOUSTON, TX .. , DATE PREPARED: 4/21195 .. 0/R NO: 40482J95 · ARREST DATE: TO BE NCIC CODE: 1100 90 RELATED CASES: FELONY CHARGE: SEXUAL ASSAULT- CHILD CAUSE NO: 692Di 8 BAIL: $ 20,000 HARRIS COUNTY PRIOR CAUSE NO: DISTRICf COURT NO: _J~s,.,oL.._-'--- IN THE NAME AND BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: Before me, the undersigned Assistant DistrictAttomey ofHarris County, Texas, this day appeared the undersigned affiant, who under oath says that he· has good.reason to believe and does believe that in Harris County, Texas, VAN WATSON, JR., hereafter styled the Defendant, on or about APRIL 12, 1995, did then and there unlawfully intentionally and knowingly cause the penetration ofthe FEMALE SEXUAL ORGAN ofVANNETTA MCGinE, hereinafter called the Complainan~ •.-~ peFsen yo~ger than seventeen years of age and not his spouse by placing IDS SEXUAL ORGAN in the FEMALE!SEXUAL ORGAN of the Complainant. ·; It is further presented that at the time the Defendant committed the felony offense of SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CHILD on or about APRll... 12, 1995, as hereinabove alleged, he used and exhibited a deadly weapon, namely, a FIREARM during the commission of and during the immediate flight therefrom. -:H. "':·- ~. PROBABLE CAUSE .AFFIANT K. D. CLARK IS A CREDIBLE . AND RELIABLE PERSON WHO IS . EMPLOYED AS A PEACE OFFICER WITH THE HOVSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JUVENILE"-SEX CRIMES UNIT. AFFIANT BELIEvES AND HAS REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THE DEPENDENT, VAN WATSON, COMMITTED THE OFFENSE OF· AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT (CHI]4D) ON OR ABOUT APRIL 12, 1995 .AT 6255 WEST AIRPORT APT 100 IN THE CITY OF HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. AFFIANT INTERVIEWED THE COMPLAINANT, VANNETTA MCGHIE, A 15 YEAR OLD CHILD AND TOOK A SWORN STATEMENT FROM HER ON APRIL 13, 1995. THE COMPLAINANT IS BELI~VED TO BE A CREDIBLE AND RELIABLE PERSON WHO KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TELLING THE TRUTH AND TELLING A .LIE, AND KNOWS THE DEFENDENT, VAN WATSON, BY NAME, BY SIGHT AND AS HER FATHER. . THE COMPLAINANT STATED TO OFFICER CLARK THAT ON THE MORNING OF APRIL 12,. 1995, THE DEFENDENT WOKE HER UP TO IRON SOME CLOTHES AND THEN PULLED OUT A PISTOL AND TOLD HER TO TAKE HER CLOTHES OFF. THE DEFENDENT FURTHER PUT THE GUN TO THE HEAD OF THE COMPLAINANT AND STATED HE WOULD KILL HER IF ~HE REFUSED, THEREBY PLACING THE COMPLAINANT IN FEAR OF HER LIFE'. THE COMPLAINANT STATED THE DEFENDENT THEN INSERTED HIS PENIS INTO HER VAGINA~ AGAI~ST THE PEACE AND DIGNITY OF THE STA}/f· .. · . Sworn to an~ subscribed before me on~f'4" J ' L0.) ' no· fll£0 CH A:d.t.S B.4.C ~·RISSE ffj~ cad 1 fl!C:""'"OJr·y i./ u.~ ERV ''• C1. rue L1 I'.,;, ~j , ·HJ\HR/S :::i:i<.':ii! ~1 :\ ~" ·· AFFIANT '"·· _,_ E-".•l;) ASSISTANTDISTRICf ATIORNEY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Pi'J J: 55 10 I THE STATE OF TEXAS D.A. LOG NUMBER: 186983 VS. CJIS TRACKING NO.: VAN WATSON, JR. SPN: PM<>a 0 BY: DJB DANO: 595 6255 W. AIRPORT #lOD DOB: Blvfi'f~2~32' 8 AGENCY: HPD HOUSTON, TX DATE PREPARED: 4121/95 0/R NO: 40482195 ARREST DATE: TO BE ~J~ NCIC CODE: II 00 90 RELATED CASES: FELONY CHARGE: SEXUAL ASSAULT- CHILD CAUSENO: 692018 ff:?;· BAIL:"$ 20,000 HARRIS COUNTY fi:i DISTRICT COURT NO: --=-1=no'-'---~. 178th vmrari 14.xGM PRIOR CAUSE NO: GJ IN THE NAME AND BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: The duly"organiied Grand Jury of Harris County, Texas, presents in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, that in Harris County, Texas, VAN WATSON, JR., hereafter styled the Defendant, on or about APRIL 12, 1995, did then and there unlawfully, intentionally and knowingly cause the penetration of the FEMALE SEXUAL ORGAN of VANNETTA MCGHIE, hereinafter called the Complainant, a person younger than seventeen years of age and not his spouse by placing IDS SEXUAL ORGAN in the FEMALE SEXUAL ORGAN of the Complainant. It is further presented that at the time the Defendant committed the felony offense of SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A CtnD on or about APRIL 12, 1995, as hereinabove alleged, he used and exhibited a deadly weapon, naniely, a FIREARM during the commission of and during the immediate flight therefrom. FOREMAN 178TH ~~· INDICTMENT - FOREMAN OF THE GRAND JURY 19 ·' THE STATE OF TEXAS D.A. LOG NUMBER: 198576 VS. ens TRACKING NO.: VAN WATSON, JR. 6255 W. AIRPORT #lOD SPN: 00932568 DOB: 11-24-52 Lqct~ -BY: GAW DA NO: 609 AGENCY:HPD HOUSTON, TX 77035 DATE PREPARED: 06-12-95 O!R NO: 40482195 -ARREST DATE: TO BE NCJC CODE: 1115 34 RELATED CASES: FELONY CHARGE: . AjjSEXUAL. ASSAULT - CHILD /.!JW 178th . .... .3 0)600 CAUSE NO: (p 9 q 3. \ d-' GJ ~- BAIL: $26,909- PRIOR CAUSE NO: F.AR..lUS COtJI\'TY ,DISTRICT COlJRT NO: 180TH -;¥- . _We . '?f1o FIRST SETIING DATE: VOL+L.~ageLM_ AXGt.. IN THE NAME AND BY AU"-HORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: The duly organized Grand Jury of Harris County, Texas, presents in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, 1 in Harris County, Texas, VAN WATSON, JR., hereafter styled the Defendant, on or about APRIL 12, 1995, then and there unlawfully, intentionally and knowingly cause the penetration of the female sexu_al oz:gan of V ann' McGhie, hereinafter called the Complainant a person younger than seventeen years of age and not his spouse -placing his sexual organ mthe female sexual organ of the Complainant, and in the ~ourse of the same crim: . episode the Defendant used and exhibited a deadly weapon, namely, a firearm. AGAINST THE PEACE AND DIGNITY OFTHE STATE. FOREMAN HSTH· FOREMAN OF !HE GRAND JURY - ·INDICTMENT -/! -~u/ ~-5 CAUSE NO. COUNT NO ____________ THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE _____.,__)--<,..£'----=-{)-·_ DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY. TEXAS :ii MOTION TO DISMISS ! TO THE HONORABEE f! JUDGE OF SAID COURT: . . . : NOW COMES the!$tate of Texas by and through her District Attorney, and respectfully requests the Court to dismiss the above entitled and numbered criminal action for the following reason: · li [==:J The Dgfendant was convicted in another case or count. >i . [==:J In custody elsewhere. · [==:J Old ca~e. no arrest. c=J Missir/g witness.· c=:l Requd't of complaining wimess. c=J Motio9 1, to suppress granted:. c=J Co-Defendant tried, this Defendant testify. c:::=J lnsuffi8ient evidence. c=J Co-Defendant convicted. i"nsufflcient evidence this Defendant. ~ase rJfiled. c:::=J Other.!! . il EXPLANATION: \:. . ~/-!Jiol / /1 ~r~--l ·/7(}" J~no \: ~ -~ :# &J?~ 3/ d V'--1'~ ;[ . ,: REOORDER'S MEf;-'ORAND~M: ThiS instrument ,s of poor quality - and notsatisfactol)' tor photographiC recordation; and/Or alt~ra~lOnS were present at the time of f1imtn&- II WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, it is requested that the above entitled and numbered cause be dis- missed. fF~ · · i f4' ?· . I L · .·II CHAE6;;:£~:~~~:~'~ :. ___ I: JUL 2 .7. 7995 'lil)·~:_ tr2 --- - . - - \ By . !' : r:is Co:...:\tl· I, c, "-'as I -----;:;----- ORDER . ~ ~ ThqJSegoing motidn having been pres'eri~~ to me on this the day of . .A;2:1_ · A.D. !9 . and the sam'e having been considered. it is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGDand CREED that said above entitled and numb,red cause be and the same is hereby dismissed. ·· . ··(··.· ·&~~ JUDGE I~ 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PI STRICT COURT HARRJS COUNTY, TEXAS OA FOAM 10875 Original· %ire: Stare·s Copy - ?ink, Sheriffs Copy - Yellow g • I ! I NO. 699312 THE STATE 0~ I TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF vs. I HARRIS COUNTY, T E X A S VAN w~.TSON, i!JR. lBDTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT i I TO THE HONOP~LE I JUDGE OF SAID COURT: I I COMES Npw VAN WATSON, JR., Defendant in the above I , I . ent·~tled and !numbered cause by and through his Attorney of Record; i RONALD N. HA~ES, and moves that this court allow him to_adopt any i and all moti~ns filed previously in said cause, whether the motions be: pro se·motions, motions filed by an attorney rep:::-esenting the l Defendant pr.}or to Mr. Hayes becoming attorney of record for I Defendant; m6tions filed under different .cause numbers which . I . were subsequ$ntly reindicted by the State ~nder the present I cause nuniber;I motions filed by ahy co-defendant in a different I' cause number ~rising out of the same a_lleged offense·; and to allow !. I· ~he - ~ De~en d an:t 1• ~~a ~- ~ ~~ea~ any recor d so f any ~~ype · h ~ w.a~soever ~·1 e d Ll l as records under cause # 692018 as a part of the businessj~edical . I case . file under I Cause # 69931'2 as if such records had been filed . o;jginally u~der saiq Cause # 699312 ~ tMt.,/__ ~ tf;--a,m;4r-o fire.{ f'(lor/7~ 1'- /(.fc:urcf.; l.: Uu.P.- 1!.,4' t't'J 3/Z.. wHEREFO~E, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant prays ·that the ~~ I . i 0") ·. Court grant _tpis motion and allow the Defendant to adopt the I' "'. ... above mentionrd -:motions -~fnd records a:nd that···tney-be· considered a---- part of the :rkcord in the above entitled and num.bered cause. . c:::j ' I . c.!:>. '· ' (.0. t . \ 'OJ . l ! !: o~OORDER'S MEMORANDUM: '· ~"'- · t or qual1ty i; This instrument ts o po hie .-'actory for photograp J -"' no t t sa ~~· · er" ''"" . . an d/or a\terattons w ~ ! ! recordatton, . . presen t a•' th"~ time of ftlmtng. 317 !l' I) . t.i}'i}h f) ! 'S -· --~ ' .l.- --i . .- ~ ) !,_ i ·: :. ••.. ....!t.. . . . . ._. ·-if.-··' .:-;-_. ...j lI ! Res~full • submitted, ( /J I,1 I I I N. HAYES Attorney for Defendant 405 Main, suite 430 Houston, Texas 77002 I I ( 713) 237-0034 TBA# 09280000 I I I I I. . . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereb~ c~r~if.y that a (!opy o_f the foregoing mqtion has been mailed to ~he D~s~r~ct Attorney of Harris County at 201 Fannin, Houston, Tet 77002, on £-~i:i4-...---- l ~N HAYES 1- • 0 R D E R I f~n 5E IT R~EMBERED that the was presented to ~~/ I the court on this I ~ day of 1 c;t1), and it is, therefore ORDERED that the motion is hereby GRJl.N'J'~D/DENIED ~· l (YLCJ ' ' 0 .• '(0 I 1 . -..., .. I I ! !\ ! I I l I ·-·- ~-.L t J-~ · No(zj • CAUSE NO. 699312 • STATE OF TEXAS § . IN THE 180TH DISTRICT COURT VS. § OF VAN WATSON § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS AFFiDAVIT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority personally appeared JOLINE K. HART, who being duly sworn deposed as follows .. My name is JOLINE K. HART. I am a Deputy District Clerk employee assigned as a Deputy Court Clerk of the Crimina.! Courts Division for the District Clerk's office. · In the above referenced case, failure to forward the clerk's record to the Court of Appeals timely was because of THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT COULDN'T BE LOCATED UNTIL 1'2/27113. The record is be' orwarded to the Court of Appeals on thi's·the 27TH day of December, 2013. .,.,:~:::· tC{.i;t,:·;. ~... ,."" "' ~· -~?><-"·-:~··< ~·. - . .. j'j . ...- ..... ~· .t..L!....,... ,y. ·,·..,-..· ;0 ' .,_ .." ' ' ' .. ,;::;; '. ' ~~u ; '\ q ~.·. .~ ! ~1· to \!~~~~~ SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me on the 27TH day of December, 2013. c~&ot!!ufftm RlSTINE B,A..LDWIN, Supervisor Criminal Bureau 599 52 •CAUSE No. 6 9931 ~ • _To: _HARRIS C.OUNT-Y -DISTRICT_ CLERk _ AITEAI:. MR.~ /(Ell J..JE:UITT __ FR.OJVJ: .IYIR. VAJV WATSON3 JR~ DAlE : 6- ;;t- 93 RE-As·ow~ TRIAL RE.coRDo -~R~ETIN&_S _ ~ ·I; -- - - - LEGAL NOi.IC~ . .. lj ·~ DE:AR SrR ~· I - -- ----.... --- ; ___ I am _tn .. re.c elpf_of. .Your_ rnosf recenf /e-H-e.r olp..-fed I . . _j +he :J.YlcL Do.v_t?f' AP.rt/ _ i_qqg j:D.ur_ ~~~ ol.iocuosecl . o L varto~ __o.s,ou,-1~ of' /eso./_ ol_o.c.u·mertt.s in .covH1eGtiot\ w:+h_ +he. aho__ve _ccu--tse. Now _fn _er-cle.r-. tc PrWeV\+ e>.f\Y.. _ 1 _ I .Ms.SUo ol e.f.SJMO\Jt'\8 Q .L -i o - o_r._ ~' fYlt.5.CO»tt1'\IAr\.IC \ • i ' I I. • 1. Pie~e +o.k~ nl!>+fce_ ~+ 5>Pect~teo.l/v V'ovt. Ottle.seof· .. I ~.3) +k;~ -1-~ _PC>o3e.s o c~t of ~e(3o~ three hut~dred ond i efshf Po.3es wlt!t~ t'Yiecu'!S ~efe. o.re(:A9sj +wo-hundred ( .! .c:1nd f\?nt\f'--Ave fo.ges f, whfdt I ~H>.ve.. t'lO fdea. what . ·l-ike" Con5;P.st of' S~V\ce. ~lou .. advl~e0- me. ~-t. -fi.1e.re ~- lj no .sfc,fe.MeV\t of f'£Ac.+~ P.re..PwecL It- ts VV\V CeqiAe&t .. 1/ before ·I P~r~~ ~(\Y/ oloaJ.mev\+s ~f .VP~A ~PecA"f:t~llt . !i ~nfot~ed. me. CJf_ 4e. no.me.s . af e.o.drt avd ever-y doc.,um evvf ..· . i c.ol\ne.ded w~:l-h -+he.. (_a_qs) +wo-hu:~tdred av1d Yl•'"rdv·:Rve Po.ses- m v/. c~.se .+de.. For whereD.s tf- ·j-5 mvf desfre.1o ohfoJ11 11 . j .fhere.-1 tt +~ ~er:tf-ffed sJ nBle:. CQ PY. of eo.ch. ow,d everY fl:Jae iiiere J'n .. . . .. .mv .c:o.se.. :H.Ie . . .Pie.as_e_ .b.~ . Q..1h'k._ ---· .--. l_.~·e:1ter .erofV!_e+./v. Ho.weV..et._.tf _.\f.Qu. ho.-tLe M'i. quesflo.ns o.r: - I . . ~ .. ~ \·~~· o-!her. f!ro hiem . Ga6WI'\ bt s ihis malhr. Please cotrfo.d _rn e af G\ ~:2-aJ.drebS bJowo . ·-·- .. _---·-· _ _ _ __ .__ __ ____ _ _____ . . ~· II ~·'-l'- ~-r'·~ t ); . il J . ..-~:I'!~,~~D ·d;; ;,,. ~~ ?- ;£· - - ~~t.u · JV~. - - . u . ···."..- .. ·-- - : ~;:0:z:~ ~l!F~wPI\1\if S:r:t>M · iJJ(E_ . JJ ~ g; ~ f.p 7 r. o ,. Bp y 1I'!; _ ___ . ____ _ ~{ (/) f{ e 0, e d f' ~JCq 5 · 7 f: f{ c..nry srAte :.1 l- .336 100 . I tJo leT) Di5po.seJ ~:if.$ ~~~~; ~+ '* J 11 J efv far f Texas State Law Library Invoice PO Box 12367 #22744 Austin, Texas 78711-2367 . Phone 512-463-1722 Fax 512-463-1728 Created by ICS, 07/01/2013 --i Account# 4039 Phone Name Watson, Jr, Van- #737444 Fax II Contact Email • Address Terrell Unit (027) 1300 FM 655 Rosharon, TX 77583 Services Unit Price Quantity Price Service Charges $0.00 1 $5.00 Photocopies - Document Delivery $0.25 269 $67.25 Subtotal $72.25 Payment details Tax- $5.55 Total $77.80 . Date Rec. By Method Auth ID/ Check# Amount 07/01/2013 ICS 556284 $77.80 PAID Check Notes: Payment for Estimate# 2740, copies are being sent to Texas thus sales tax is charged · ' I http://voyager.courts.state.tx.uslinvoicelinvoiceslinvoice.cfm?patronid=4039&invoiceid=22744 7/l/20U , I STATE LAW LIBRARY P.O. BOX 12367 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2367 To: Van Watson, Jr #737444 From: Inmate Copy Service Staff Re: Cost of your request (#5069) for copies received March II, 2013 Estimate 112740 dated March 25. 2013 ,.---------- --------------------,.----- :----------,--·-·---------~ L Document Requested (~~~Pa~~-L Cost_J__ Check to order -/, i Court of Criminal Appeals i!wR-45,285-01 1852687 ~---,-----------i f--!---- ~ L--f-·--------~ : i ·Action Tnken , I Pages \ $0.25 ; n f r ~---- f----f-- ,__, \·Clerk's Summary Sheet I' I Pages ! $0.25 1 0 / I r-+- i l ~-Cover Sheet ------ -i----!-. ~-a_g_es__ $0.25 l _L______O_______)i l L·lndcx i l Pages ! $0.25 ) 0 ! ~-~ •Caption I I Pages L~.:~-[~~-----~ [~pplication for Writ ~f Habeas Corpus & Cover Letter·· i 62 Pages I S15.50 ~ 0 1 ! i ·Acknowledgments ot Rccctpt 1 2 Pages \So.50 : 0 1------==:::::..---, LJ 1- ·State's Original Answer & Cover Letter I 19 Pages ' j $4.75 l 0 1 j i I ·State's Proposed Order Designating Issues and for Filing an Affidavit & Cover Letters . 1 ,·-~:;-·: 1 ·;;~-~~· - - - 0·-----~., ~··Inquiry Letter from Applicant & Response h Pages rso-:-.5(}"j 0 j 1 ~~~~i~~::~~- Motion for Court to Compel Counsel to File Affidavit & I 3 Pages --L-$0.7~L__O -----' \_!·Acknowledgment of Receipt ~ i $0.25 i 0 1 l !·Answer of Ronald Hayes to Writ of Habeas Corpus & Cover Letters ! 8 Pages \s2{io--~ 0 ~-~-te-·s-P-;:;;po-sc-df'~ings of Fact and Order & Cover Letter t 3 Pactes i-·so·7'S"~------tJ=----: r--r:Piea, Ad~JOnislunents, & Waivers ,.. -~ii~~r-----o---1 7 Pa:;s-· rtDocket t~dictmcnt ---· . 12~~D~50 I Pages __ [__ $0~=-: 0 _=I .i T-=-o I ~·Judgment & Scntcn_c~ 2 Pages L~5~L 0. i !.! t-Clc:k's Ccrtif!c3tC I P~gcs i $0 '"'~5 L __ -=.. __ l n 1 ______ ..1,-J=--- I ~ourt of Criminal Appeals 1 ~-4s,2ss~o2_1s9o397 -~ ___ [____..- ... f- fi·Ac~ion"T;c~--.... [ 1 Pages I $0.25 ; 0 ~lCierk's-Summa:~jh';;;-· 1 1 Pages l so~~s---r __ 0::::::--.-_-_-_-_-__ j i !•Cover Sheet i I Pages \ $0.25 ! 0 \ - ·-----------+------1----f- ' I j·lndcx l Pages \ $0.25 i 0 ! f- \ !·Caption I I Pages !....----~ i $0.25 i. 0 [_(!.pplication for Writ ot~ Habeas Corpus ~ges=t-_:3.25 .. L...:...___O_____ _j i ~cknowled~mcnts of Receipt 1 2 Pages I $0.50 · \ 0 \ t=[~tatei. or~~nal :\r~~~;&~~------- LJState's Propose~!~~-~ngs of Fact and Order & Cover Letter ----L-~age~--~l.~~ '-s~~=~~===D L:!~ges ____ .L~. ?~-l- 0=----- -=-=: i li •['::ca, Admonishments & ~Vaivers D~~-k~~-------- ..-----. ! ----------------T- 7 Pages 2 Pages --1---~~~=--L j $0.50 j ..........-.IJ··---·--·' 0 f Van Watson, Jr Estimate #2740-25 Mar 2013 $77.80 ..__.-:LJ~~d~t·~~1~--~---------···-:·-~----··--~~-~-----~~~~~-::~_J i ·Judgment & Sentence __~ Pag~~-----L! so.25 J.~ t 2 Pages $0.50 I ___b] 0 ____ ,____ _J . i l--f.-------------------------------------·--·-----·~----·--·------;----·--(---------·----------·1 i i ·Clerk's Certificate ~~-l-- ! 1 Pages i $0.25 i ~--·------------------~--------L---~-----·-·----~------i i 0 !·Applicant's Objections to Respondent's Proposed Findings of Fact ! 3 Paoes $0.75 i ! U i . ! and Order . i " i i J fc~urt of Criminal Appeals --- ..· - - -.. -------------L----------'------·~----·----·--··: 1jwR-45,285-03_I920siS-----·-------------- -r-----[---------------~ I . --------·--·- ---~--------1-:;----·--·---·---·---: ) !•Action Taken I i D [fclerk'~~mmary Sheet---~=-~----- [ i •Cover Sheet -------· J_ ! 1 Pages I Page~ 1 Pages 1 $0.25 r$0.25-~----d \ $0.25 \ 0 -==i.l j L~~~---------------- _[ I Pages ! $0.25 ;.._ _____0 _______ : i ·Caption I ! 0 : ! ! ·Application for Writ------. .-----------r 53 Pages $13.25 1 I Pages $0.25 -----1 !-!-=-=------------ of Habeas Corpus • 1 I r----- ' 0 I [_~ ·Acknowic~_g_n_1c_n~=~~~-----·--· f----zp;;;;;;--~--$o:SO[=----·Q~:==~ i ! •State's Original Answer & Cover Letter 4 Pages ' $1 .00 i 0 ) !·tv-"t-a-tc-'sP-ro_p_o_s_cd_F_i-nd-ing~ of Fact and Order & Cover Letter l4 Pages ~~-~------~=r-------: 1--i-------·----·-------·-·--·· i--------r--------;----.....::=.:--...-.---·i It-r·- !·Plea, Admonishments & Waivers l 7 Pages l $1.75 ! 0 : l !•Docket l 2 Pages ·-~-1-------------i I $0.50 j . 0 i i !•Jndictment i 0 _______. . l-1-- -· if:Mgm-en_t_&_S_e_n_tc-n~-·-· I. ! I Pages 2 Pages . $0.25 I $0 50 ~ r·----'o= --· 'I l j •Clerk's Certificate l.__._.-~----·----------------- I Pages ! $0.25 0 "-----~-----: i ICourt of Criminal Appeals l r--fWR-45.285-03 1921676 ·------- !•Supplemental ~emo.-ra_n_d_u_t_n_o_f_L_a_w---------------ii'-_7_P_a-gc-s--j r------~-c==-- $1.75 j .·--=! ___];:]______ ; 1Court of Criminal Appeals . li WR-45,285-03 1922069 ·---------,..-------,---;-·----·----- 1--I·Motion i_n Op1~osition to the Statc's._A_n_s_"_'e-r----------+--------I--$-1-.5-0-f--_~~-_-[J__-====--~ !Court of Criminal Appeals l l. I ~~~~~~-~------------------------~--------r- WR-45,285~04_2463023 •Action Taken I Pages l..-..---1---·-·--c=::---- ' i $0.25 i 0 j '-i 1-----~ --! I1 !•Writ of Mandamus ' -.-.... ----·--------· ________ i_______ __~, 5 Pages ! $1.25 ....;____-'_ 1 0 ·-------------------------------- .j • Total pages:[-- 269 \ f-,. T ota I cost::' $'7 o .25-----t,_ • ; ~--------·-----; ' Tax (8.25%): 1 $5.55 i !------------------- ' .Scrvtce . Charge: r---------·--i ; $5.00 ; 1---------·-----------.. ------·---------------------·--·--------~---· ·! i ORDER TOTAL:i $77.80 L-----·----·---·----- ---------~·· ------- Van Watson, Jr Estimate #2740-25 Mar 2013 $77.80 \ ' . .,. .-: : Mr. Ronald N. Hayes, Attorney P.o. Box 801525 Houston, Tx. 77280-1525 C.M.R.R.R. # 7007 0220 0004 2S38 4130 !"larch 11, 2013 Corpus Filed By Van.Watson 1...:... J ;:. " Tti~l Court Number 699312-A .l80th District Court, Harris County, Texas $tyle~: EX PARTE VAN WATSnN JR. In Jisht of Ex Parte Mouasazadeh, 361 s.w. 3d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012); Lafler v. Cooper, 132 s.ct. 1376 (2012) and your a r-, o v e "l\ n s we :r " \v o u l d 1ou be 1:1 j_ ll in ':3 to ·=it her a IJ en (1 or supplement that answer. I. ~rwuld i~o your ''l\.nG'.·ier.-" bring your attention in· which J'OU st t:. ..;:, C! ;, :3 2 ~ pr-om i s •2 md de t o t he De fend a n t l n '1' he r e wa 5 no c o n n e c t :i. o n "' i t h hi s J? l e a of ':3 u i 1 t~ y o t 11 .;:~ r t h an t: h a '::. t: h •2 Co:...; i:." t:. could considar a deferred adjudication and all th0 way up to the ma.ximuw rang<2 of punishment uhich, if mJ recol,lection qf a c~o on punishment is correct, would have bee~ the~ 30 years 1n the Texas Department of Criminal Justice~ Answer at p. 3 ~ 2 u ll. n s we r ~~ which you stated: 'l 1 had' a copy in ~y file. it is my recollection that we filed a written motion for comrnunitt service ~nd that, of course, the Court denied that motion in seDtencin0 Mr. Watson to the 30 tear sentence Answer at P- 3 t 4 "Ansv1er", in vlhich you stated: fJ.: I was not a-o;..iare of any ~vjdence, i.ncluding the medical recor6s the complainant mentions ~hich would verify that no sexual act occurred between M~. Watson and his 15-year old daughter. I certainly saw no riodical examination report that in any way indicated that there had bee~ rio ~~x0~l ~~~~tiJ.t of the complainant. -Answer at p.3-4- ·~ 4 lv!r - I do not know if you had the op?ortunity to review the 2nt.ire i\p;,;lication for w~it of Hab~as Cor0us that wa~ filed and that you answered to. Had ;Ciu reviewed ti1e '2ntir>2 Ap0lication, you woulrJ have noticed ce:ct.a:i.n records from the "Texa.:; Chi 16rens HospitaJ" unaer Medical ~ecores Jl tt f-JC;l5;:f1.9 no SJ:)E:rm 01:." txich :f:.ounc'.i on t h;~ ''~·Jet r··1ount '', tt1at 21 L. ::1pe kit ,,;as done, any of '.-l'lich would have shown that no assault. 7007 0220 OOOL1 2538 4130, pa'.:)e l uf took .i_).l ace. f'lr. !-layes. a co&).l of the "DisposE:'Cl J.\pplicati.on for ~)rit of flabeas Corpus" may be located at the Texas State Law Library Archives for your information and review. In overrulin~ Ex Parte Evans, 690 s.w. 2d 274 (Tex. Crim. App. App. 1985) the Court of Criminal Appeals created a new rule of constitutional law that quite ?Ossibly would ~ffect my Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, especially when you consider your "An.s-vJer" a no the appearance of a deferre~ adJudication for Thirty 1 ears. I have s<::arcned t:hr:ousl1 tile Clerks H2co.rd and cannot locate ant motion for community supervision in my caBe. Mr. Hayes. I have almost completed my sentence when you stop to consi6er tnat th~re wasn't any deadly weapon entered into evidence because no weapon e~isted. You may access the Texas State Law Library Archives thcou;11 the internet and review the entire Application for WriL of Habeas Corpus as well as the accompanying Exhibit's to insure that the medical :cepo·ct 11as i.nclt;oed at that time. , . In CO::-JC.LU.SJ.Oll, I couJ.c3 not reasonably say that I committed the of tense at the time I pleacJ out and that application would help support that claim. 1 ar:c rnerelj asKln~ you to review the records, the case law and assist me if -v;arrante('J. I ' may oe reacheC at the ad0rees below for JOUr r~sponse. Thank you in advance for your kind and prompt attention in this , matter . S i n c e r e J. ~·· 4 _0~-~~f-"?2 . Van Watson Jr., Defendant/aegucster C.T. Terrell Unit. 737444 l3CO Flf. 1 ~!S5 Rosharon, Tx. 77583 700/ 0220 0004 2538 4130, page 2 of 2, Mr. Ronald N- Hayes. -2-1· Scanned Law Office Of Ronald N. Hayes and Associates A Profession<: II Corporation (713) 237-0034 405 Main. Suite 4~ ,.)o.3 [713} 524-7670 Houston, Texas 77002 January 20, 2000 Fax (713} 939-0679 Charles Bacarisse Hanis County District Clerk 301 San Jacinto P.O. Box 4651 Houston, Texas 77210-4651 Re: Van Watson, Jr. Cause No:-6993120) l 80th District Court Post-Conviction Writ of Habeas Corpus Dear Sir: Enclosed please find an original and one copy of the Attorney's Answer to Post- Conviction Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed by Van Watson, Jr. By copy of this letter I am forwarding a copy to the Harris County District Attorney's office, Post-Conviction Writ Department and to Mr. Van Watson, Jr. RH/js Encl. cc: Harris County Post-Conviction Writ Department w/encl. Van Watson w/encl. C ;~;0( .: .I Scanned Oct20, ·.. ,. ..:.. NO. 699312-A EX PARTE IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS VAN WATSON, JR., I 80TH JUDICIAL DlSTRICT Applicant ATTORNE ·, '<;ANSWER TO POST-CONVICTION WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED BY VAN WATSON JR. In response to Mr. Wa,;on's Post-Conviction Writ and the Proposed Order designating issues and for tiline an affidavit summarizing the facts of the case and, in genera!, my efforts to represent, lr. \Vatson: r was appointed to rcpres>nt Van Watson, Jr. out of the !80th District Court on Ap.r:il 25, 1995. I leame.d that Mr. Warson had allegedly, on April 12, 1995, at gun point sexually assaulted his i 5-ycar old natural daughter. At that time I reviewed the State's files, had discussions with my client and on April 26, 1995 went to the District Attorney's office and made a full review of the offense report in his case. From early. conversations with the Defendant he claimed to have no recollection of committing the offense, claimed a history of mental illness and gave me information with regards to his medical records and the places he had been treated, but took no position that he had '11 not committed the offense. Over the ,next couple of months, I filed motions for sanity 0 C:l evaluations, had many letters back and forth between myself and the Defendant. I Gl C. . .:...! requested a competency and sanity evaluation on Mr. Watson. Those evaluations come back with a finding that he was competent to stand trial and sane at the time of the alleged offense. ! continued efforts to obtain records from Rosewood Psychiatric cf\) ~ I\ ,j- ·1 ./ v .-~\! .r) ,:._ .:...-' Scanned Oct ~0, Hospital, St. Luke's Hospital, from a Dr. Levinthal, and a Dr. Shaadi. During this period of time it became my impression that Mr. Watson would want to try his case to a jury and our efforts to obtain records and pull together anything that might help him, should he be found guilty, increased. r obtained infonnation on two other people who had children by Mr. Watson and attempted to contact them for any information that might be helpful. I prepared the motion for an independent mental health expert to work with us on the case in the event that that case had to be set for trial. This was due to a request by the Defendant that perhaps he might he go into the Baylor College of Medicine Sex Offender Program and would like Dr. Michael Cox from that program to be able to testifY in connection with potential punishment to a jury. Subpoenaes were issued for medical records, several of which were f!led with Court from the various facilities that had treated Mr. Watson. As my representation continued it became apparent that Mr. Watson was not realistic in hi.s expectations. He several times inquired about when he would be able to go back together with his family which was not likely to happen. He also seemed to believe that he could just go into a mental hospital and not have to deal with the criminal charge against him. Toward August 1995, Mr. Watson made inquiry whether he could waive a jury and allow the Court to hear his case. At that time we discussed whether he would want to do that on plea of guilty or no contest, or whether he would want to have a Court trial. We discussed the various alternatives available to him at that time and the fact that, although the Court could not grant him a straight probation for the offense he <..:::> was accused of, they could consider a deferred adjudication form ofprobation if he ~.i, wished the Judge to consider that after a Pre-Sentence Investigation Report. On .__ ) _;_·:- , ,:. ~~ ···' ·.,__ ·, ..... ·-:--...·I j ..... (. ../ Scanned Oct 20 201 :::·;:·;. r ... .'::.:·.· August 4, 1995, Mr. Watso-1 entered a plea of guilty and a Pre-Sentence Report was ordered for September 28, ·; 995, at which time Judge Stricklin would do sentencing on ·the Defendant. This was d. me with no agreed recommendation with respect to punishment, although it dou seem th:l! there was an agreement that the Court would have a punishment cap of 3t l years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice should the Court sentence the Defer dant to penitentiary time. There was one sentencing delay and after a reset, the Court ir. October sentenced the Delendant to 30 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Just ice. From my recollection, the Defendant testified at his PSI hearing, still not denying that the act had occtmed, along with Vanetta McGee and Mrs. Van Watson. I will now deal with the specific portions oft:he Order where the Court has ordered me to respond to certain matters. 1. · At no time did I tell Van Watson that he could ever be given probation in exchange or as a result of a plea of guilty to the Court. Thus that factor never entered into his plea of guilty. 2. There was no promise made to the Defendant in connection with his plea of guilty other than that the Court could consider a deferred adjudication and all the way up to the maximum range of punishment which, if my recollection of a cap on punishment is correct, would have heen then 30 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 3. Although 1 would not have had a copy in my tile, it is my recollection that we filed a written motion for community service and that, of course, the Court denied that (_11 moti·::>n in sentencing Mr. Watson to the 30 year sentence. c:.J 4. I was not aware of any t:vidence, including the medical records the complainant C.::.J Cl CJI (: ~~ v ~ . :. -~ 3 Scanned Oct 20, mentions, which would verify that no sexua I act occurred between Mr. Watson and his 15-year old daughter. I certainly saw no medical examination report that in any way indi;;ated that there had been no sexual ass~,ult of the complainant. 5. Of course, i fi had been aware of a11y document, if it existed, that showed that a medical doctor, examiner, or other expert had concluded that no sexual assault took place, the discussions that I had with the Defendant. the decisions we made, could have been affected. 6. Certainly, Mr. Watson, over the several months that I represented him, agonized with the fact that he could not remember the sexual assault, but that he knew that if the girl said that he had done it, then he did it. Even during the sentencing procedure, Mr. Watson made a specific admission to having sexually assaulted his daughter although, he originally termed it having "having thi:; affair with my daughter." Mr. Watson eventually became more concerned with his belief that a jury would in all probability sentence him to a greatc;:r length of time than perhaps the Court would. It aiso became his belief that he could, through his medical records and history, his renwrse for what had happened, his willingness to admit the offense, and to acknowledge that if his daughter said he had sexually assaulted her then he must have, that he could convince the Court that he was a suitable candidate for a deferred adjudication probation. Based on all of the factors above, I certainly feel that Mr. Watson's decision was freely, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made. Respe~~ys ([") jl£),/ _____.. _- RONALD N. HAYES ~- _) . Attomey at Law c ~) {) ~- '.·.~ .. : 4 . ,, .No (G) .I I I CotArf /r.e11-s e-ri)Jf fc;,1 G to \ I I I I II / fitJ & II I I I Scanned..•Oct . .. . .20,201 ···.•.·· . >.•. 1 A. Yes, ma'am. 2 Q. What did he use? 3 A. A gun. 4 Q. Did your father make any threats ·against you? 5 A. He told me if : didn't do what he said he 6 will shoot me. 7 Q. And what exact~y did you do? 8 A. Ma'am? L 9 Q. What did he do to you? 10 A. He had sex with me. 11 Q. He placed his penis in your vagina; is that 12 correct? 13 A, Yes, ma'am. 1.4 Q. Now, the threats he made to you, were you 1.5 frightened? 1.6 A. Yes, ma'am. 17 Q. Tell the Judge exactly what he told you? 18 A. He told me if I didn't do what he said that 19 he was going to shoot me and kill himself. 20 Q. Did you believe him? 21 A. Ma'am? Q. Did you believe him? :;:3 A. Yes, ma'am. 24 Q. After this happened what did you do? :25 A. I went back to the room and went to sleep and 10 ~'& jl_ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' FF'R ZlB '95 10• 32 SIX I Ft.. S£Rv'I a:s T01 (~ ,;... , (.·· .. I ' . 0 \. •') r-, Y...:;;' o· i)I,_ ........ \,~ -~ -, : ATIEN:>ING NOTE ' I· MEDICJ. TION DOSE I AMCU'(T HOW LONG? .,-,If '" A A -.CX.-LON--uP_w_n,_H_: I .,.~, ) YOU WIU BE GAllED IF FCJUO'fflNG Te51S ARE 4fl.~N: II p~~ f'' . ·. /) i. - .... ) ''-· ·-' v ,,. -- ·J tl ... --:---·--:-·---··- -·~ ... ------· .RESIDENT:. , . , :. '>TAFF MO: -f lSTY)flY & PHYSICAl (TlUE : . ATTENDING MD: ------- ·.. IM'i's··_,_·_: :.. . ·I . •· --J-..~>J..--4-c£ --~- ·------------:- ~- -. ... . .. . Scanned Oct ~~otPr r- ..J~~ · ..;> CPH ~T REYJ:EW .-lame \fo..nneik.. t!fc Gb.,e DOB 11-13~ Aae ISyo F MRI go I 52 49 Date~ in ER.._-'4_~1...:["2=---....::'_ 1S _ _ __ Translator Needed 0 Yes 0 No Patient Relations Notined - - - - - - - - - - - - ER!FULabs RPR lSJNon-R.eactivc 0 Reactive HIV. ,n:Ne~vc 0 Positive GC Cultures Chlamydia Throat 0 Negative 0 Positive Throai 0 Negative · 0 PO$itive Vaginal/Urethral C!Negative 0 Positive 2t Negative 0 Vaginal!Uret.hra.l Positive Ro:::t:al 0 Negl!ive 0 Positive R..ectal 0 Negative 0 Positive Urlne HCG "G{ Negative 0 Positive Wet Moun1t ~ m ~ s-pec m 1 wS c s ·,, bc..c.\- ·1 1\.,!i;l or --h; cb UA Other or teens who were assaulted . Rape JFlt ru:me ri Yes 0 No Med.s given: Cdtria.J~:one 125 mg. 1M SJ Yes 0 No If oo, CPH physi:::ian n o t i f i e d - - - - - - - - - - Doxycycline 100 mg. bid x 7 days "GZf Yes 0 No If no, CPH physician notified------- Ovral* 2 tabs in ER. 2 tabs in 12 hours -gf Yes 0 No If no, CPH physici.m notired ----- Pbenergan 25 mg. with Ovral '!:!(Yes 0 No If no, CPH physician n o t i f i e d - - - - - - - - *Ovral not jpven if time since assault is > 72 hours. Disposition 0 No follow-up needed . ~ Follow in CPH Clinic_ in Ja.:1_ wecl:s Possi!ble Stndy Patient 0 Yes S::.No 0 Follow-up by Social Worker needed---·---------------- Sienature .. -- .·. ·..... ·. ~-.. ~ ..· ...· . •' ~ .Y-: ..• ::.: •; •o • • • • . -3~ r r ' J J r J , j r J r J r J r J r J ,,r J j r J r J , j j ., j ·. · . r ,/ 1 · rVo(~)r(j) . r J r J } j s+uuV\peJ 1-ept'f of Cleat: .• , j r J 0~ I e)GU:.S CDi.JU--f f>~ Cl['t/Vt) /Jf.J A(.(Je~ /~ ,:~,-,,,._...,, r J , j (jCtf~ ;1/hJ 0; ZoiS- / .· . . ,j rJ rJ I j ~I Pavy-G j j j 1 f~r ~ j j j .·."'.·· Le {-f eo frt;tflll T00 0;; CtJ w+ o.{' j j Cri M4 /VQ t. Appe"" C9- () f f e.t: . C/Vl, , R. /!, l 1000 ISJ,0 (){JO I 8qq g; P'f 2 f-e fu ru-. &d ~ ~\''1i o_t_g,o_ ex!u. cof_y__o_~ ~:; s /die'"' "-.5'-----~~­ w_e_/_f-~-~-o-5e_~£a_cLc.Lr-~.I>-@J-_3iftmf_-eJJ~flr_Lo_p_e d-O-~-fA.:_f~~~­ ~-'j;O-U.,_~-.JI(;; r'f',K_(( 5. I - - - ~- ~----· · . , 1.8_-tfl_.{Lc:o0_Cr 'Mt/fi((__J_u~J_t~cg_(ef1_-ie~L _____ _ LZO I /" (\ I· -!:fo~J:;'\-t:-ntz'tQz J -f-1-7.-20-1~ ·--,;---------------~~ - -- _£g_:-JW;.j,'&ifk+-J~$ui"''1~'---·- - - - - --_-_-__- _____ _ ~-3]-lj-LeL:_z_h_e;_lf_ll_fe_Gf-_le)<-ri~--------- -------'~ ~ ---------f-ij(€-~ifl-;Q __ £..:?_{e_irtec.J_[£o.f/h._t:I:LL-c:__f-e~:_/!:_ii._L_Th..e_Cou-V-:f-b-{:- - - - , J-~fe-_6-/-~-GJ_.f-_L-e,K~-:!>-. . · . .. . . --._ _ _ __ ,. . _o/Jg.....~etter, tl~,c6-'f.'n-r-ih.t:._-{,_;_,_,.,r-1:1.f-m-y:________ dvcv...m.r;t-1-'-T-t;-. 77 ,. · , 1 ·. - _ _ _ (;)l,,_e_!__e__t~er- 5!-CLI.i~f-r!l_e.__.,-c;_tiaw_;_"'-j-d.o_Ct'-114-t>r:z~-:E--- _ _b.P._fLe_fLie-f--b-eeq_[,_f-lt~ d.-._,_:.__.,-~;, -.. . . . , _-_- - - - - - - - - - • t . ~: · , , '~ J :r· ~ fl (. 1' ;· l - --------------------- f \. ..... ' '.- . ;" ' . . :-~· SHARON KELLER ABEL ACOSTA PRESIDING JUDGE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS CLERK (512) 463-1551 P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION LAWRENCE E. MEYERS CHERYL JOHNSON AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 SIAN SCHILHAB MIKE KEASLER GENERAL COUNSEL (512) 463-1600 BARBARA P. HERVEY ELSA ALCALA BERT RICHARDSON KEVIN P. YEARY DAVID NEWELL JUDGES September 1, 2015 Van Watson #737444 Terrell Unit 1300 FM 655 Rosharon, TX 77583 t-.·. RE: Trial Court Case #699312D Dear Mr. Watson: After a thorough search of our records, we find that you do not have a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals at this time. If you have any further questions or concerns, please direct them to the District Clerk in the convicting county where you originally filed the application. ~. J.... I am herewith returning your documents. AA/kd Enclosure · SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 201 WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM 106, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701 WEBSITE WWW.CCA.COURTS.STATE.TX.US . IJil Complete iter11s 1, 2, and 3. AI: · _,1 item 4 if Restricted Delivery is des.. _,J. ll!l Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. 1111 Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 0. Is delivery address different from item 1. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No DISIRICI' cURK, HARRIS CUNIY TEXAS 1801H. DISIRICil' CDJRr 1201 FRAN