in Re the Law Offices of Art Dula, Arthur, M. Dula, Individually, and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, Anat Friedman, Individually, and D/B/A the Law Offices of Art Dula, J. Buckner Hightower, and the Robert A. and Virginia Heinlein Prize Trust, Through

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed
October 6, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00535-CV

IN RE THE LAW OFFICES OF ART DULA, ARTHUR M. DULA,
INDIVIDUALLY, AND D/B/A THE LAW OFFICES OF ART DULA, ANAT
FRIEDMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND D/B/A THE LAW OFFICES OF ART
DULA, J. BUCKNER HIGHTOWER, AND THE ROBERT A. AND
VIRGINIA HEINLEIN PRIZE TRUST, THROUGH, ITS TRUSTEES
ARTHUR M. DULA AND J. BUCKNER HIGHTOWER, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
55th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2014-65947

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 23, 2015, relators The Law Offices of Art Dula, Arthur M. Dula,
Individually, and d/b/a The Law Offices of Art Dula, Anat Friedman, Individually,
and d/b/a The Law Offices of Art Dula, J. Buckner Hightower, and the Robert A.
and Virginia Heinlein Prize Trust, through its Trustees Arthur M. Dula and J.
Buckner Hightower, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex.
Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the
petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Jeff Shadwick, presiding
judge of the 55th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his April 22, 2015
order denying their motion to dismiss based on a forum-selection clause.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.

2