FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 06 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HENRY WILLIAM TELLES, No. 14-15032
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00982-AWI-
BAM
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2016**
Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Henry William Telles appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment
violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
We cannot review any of Telles’ contentions challenging his jury trial
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
because Telles has failed to provide the relevant pre-trial and trial transcripts
required to review the alleged errors. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom
Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th Cir. 1991) (dismissing appeal by
pro se appellant for failure to provide trial transcripts).
AFFIRMED.
2 14-15032