Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

The Attorney General of Texas JIM MATTOX Au:?Just 13, 1984 Attorney General Supreme Court Buildlng Honorable John L. Hu~chison Opinion No. JM-191 P. 0. Box 12548 Banaford County Attorney Austin, TX. 75711- 2548 P. 0. Box 506 Re: Whether a county may 512l475.2501 Spearman. Texas 7!W81 lease a building to a district Telex QlW74.1387 Telecopier 51214750258 appraisal office for a nominal consideration 714 Jackson, Suite 700 Dear Mr. Ziutchison: Dallas. TX. 752024508 2141742-8944 You have requested our opinion as to whether Aansford County may purchase land for the construction of an office building to be leased 4824 Alberta Ave.. Suite 1W to the Hansford County Appraisal District. You have informed us that El Paso, TX. 799052793 the appraisal district has proposed a contract whereby the county 91515333454 would construct an office building and lease it to the appraisal r district under a lcase-purchase agreement. The building would be Jo1 Texas. suite 700 constructed with county funds at an approximate cost of $125,000, for tkw,ton, TX. 77002-3111 the sole purpose of providing office space to the appraisal district. 713/223-W You ask whether 1:tle county is authorized to enter into such a contract. 806 Broadway. Sulte 312 Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479 The Interlocal Cooperation Act, article 4413(32c), V.T.C.S., 8081747-5238 permits local gwernmente to contract among themselves for governmental servic:cs "which all parties to the contract are legally authorized to perfcrm." Sec. 4(b). The Interlocal Cooperation Act in 4309 N. Tenth. Suite B itself does not :,nfer upon a governmental body any additional McAllen, TX. 78501-1885 512mE2&47 substantive auth0rj.t.y to perform particular acts. Thus, we must look to substantive law to determine whether the county is authorized to enter into the cont,ract at issue here. 200 Main Plaza. Suite 400 San Antonio, TX. 782052797 An appraisal tl:.strict is a political subdivision responsible for 5121225.4191 appraising propert]' values for the use of every taxing unit within the appraisal district-r! boundaries , which generally coincide with county An Equal OpportunityI lines. Although a lumber of statutes authorize a couauissioners court Attlrmatlve Action Employer to provide office buildings for county purposes and to lease the unneeded portions 'to private persons or to other public agencies, the statutes do not permit a county to construct a facility for the sole use of another pol:l~:icsl subdivision , regardless of whether the county is adequately comp