Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

: J THE AITOFUWEY GENERAL OILFTrExAs J&e Il. 1973 The Honorable Wiley L. Cheatham O~~B~OB No. H- 48 District Attorney 24th Judicial Dietrict Re: Whether a perron who Cuero, Texam 77954 rsceivee a felony probated rentence under Article 725b, Section 23(a), V. T. P. C., may under certain circum- atanccr receive a recond Deer Mr. Cheatham: felony probated eentence. You have requcrtad the opinion of thir office on the following quertions: “(1) If e perron receivea a felony probeted sentence for a violation of the narcotic law under Penal Code, Arti- cle 725b, Section 23(e). may a judge grant him another probeted eentence for e later felony violation of Article 725b? “(2)” Mey l defendant who her received e felony probated lentence under Penal Code, Article 125b end whose probetionery rentence haa run out by the kpre of time. then receive a second felony probationary sentence for either unlawful poeeeerion of a nercotic drug (a felony) or rale of a narcotic drug (a felony)? "(3) May a defendantwho bar received a felony probationary sentence and had him probation terminated by the court under C. C. P., Article 42.14, Section 7, receive a necoad felony probated lentenca for a felony conviction or either poereaeion or rat of narcotic drugr under .Penal Coda 725b? ‘I p. 198 The Honorable Wiley L. Cheatham, page 2 (H-48) Article 725b, Section 23(a), V. T. P. C., provides: “Except ae provided in Subeectionn (b) and (c) of this section, any person who violates lny provision of thin Act is guilty of a felony and upon e first con- viction ie punishable by imprironment in the peniten- ‘. tlary for not leei’ than two yeara nor more’ than life; end upon a second or rubrequent conviction, he ie punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for not leer than 10 years nor more than life. Suspended rentence or prohation under the Adult Probation and Parole Law in not availeble to a peraon upon a ,eecond or clubsequent conviction. ” This statute ueee the same language regarding both enhanced een- tences and the availability of probation. ‘I. . . upon a second or subsequent conviction. ” Both probation and the possibility of an enhanced sentence are dependent upon whether there was e prior conviction for a violation of this act. It is our opinion that the Legislature, by thie uoe of the same language in these two auccesrive sentencee, intended that the came mean- ing for “conviction” apply in both eituationr. Because this article provides for enhanced punishment for second and subsequent violations of the Narcotic Drug Act, it has been held that a prior violation may not be used to enhance punishment under the provisiona of Article 62 and 63, V. T. P. C. Heredia v. State, 468 S. W. td 833 (Tex. Crim. 1971). However, authoritative interpretationr of Article 63, V. T. P. C., may be helpful in understanding it. Article 63, V. T. P. C., provide*: “Whoever shall have been three timer convicted of a felony leer than capital ehall on ruch third convictioh be imprironed for life in the penitentiary. ” Like Article 725b. it predicater enhanced punirhment upon a prior conviction or convictions. In White v. State, 353 S. W. 2d 229 (Tex. Crim. p. 199 The Honorable Wiley L. Cheatham, page 3 (H-48) 1962), the court considered the iarue of what conatitutea a prior conviction under Article 63, V. T. P. C., and came to the following conclurion: “The pronouncement of sentence upon the defendant in all felony cases lear than capital in errsential to a final judgement of conviction. In the absence of any evidence showing a final conviction of the appellant in the two prior convictions alleged for enhancement, the evidence im insufficient to support the conviction. . . . “The mandate off Article 42.02, V. T. C. C. P.] requires that the sentence order the judgment of the court be carried into execution. In a felony case, the skntence is the final judgment of conviction, with- out which there is no final conviction. ” It is therefore clear that, for purpoee.9 of enhancing punishment for prior convictions, the prior conviction must be one that ia final, meaning aantence has been pronounced ordering the judgment be carried into execution. Section 3 of Article 42.12, V. T. C. C. P., provideo in part: 9, . (Clourts . . . shall have the powers, after . . conviction or a plea of guilty . , . , to luepend the imporition of the sentence and place the defendant on probation . . , .” Under the probation law, sentence io not pronounced but in deferred. See Tee1 v. State, 432 S. W. 2d 911 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968). Therefore a sentence which has been probated is not final and ir not a conviction for purposes of enhancement under Article 725(b), V. T. P. C., nor for purpoaer of preventing probation thereunder. We therefore answer your first question that a person who is under probated sentence for a violation of Article 725b. Section 23 (a), V. T. P. C., p. 200 . . The Honorable Wiley L. Cheatham, page 4 (H-48) may be granted another probated leotence for a later felony violation of that article. Your recond and third queetionr concern the eituation where a . probated defendant hae completed hie full period of probatidn by the lap?= .’ of time or hae had hir probation terminated by the court under Article 42.12, Section 7,’ V. T. C.C. P. , which provider in part: “At any time, the defendant haa l after atimfactorily completed one-third of the original probationary period or two year@ of probation, whichever ia the leraer, the period of probation may be reduced or terminated by the court. Upon the satisfactory fulfillment of the conditions of probation, and the expirationof the period of probation, the court, by order duly entered, shall amend or modify the original sentence imposed, if necerrary, to conform to the probation period, and shall dircharge the defendant, ” Where the defendant hao satisfactorily completed hi8 period of probation, the court ie required to discharge him, and in fact never pronouncee sentence ordering execution of the judgment of the court, aa would constitute a final judgment of conviction sufficient to clupport enhancement. See White v. State, supra. It ia therefore our opinion that a defendant who haa success- fully completed by lapse of time a prior probated sentence for a violation of Article 725b, Section 23(a), V. T. P. C., ia not thereby prohibited from receiving a second probated sentence for a felony conviction thereunder. Similarly, to answer your third question, where the prior probationary sentence bar been terminated by court order under Section 7, Article 42.12, V.T.C.C.P., the defendant ia eligible to receive a recond felony probated rentence for a felony conviction for either poreerrion or rale of narcotics drug* under Penal Code, Article 725b. SUMMARY Under Article 42.12, Vernon’6 Texan Code of Criminal Procedure, a probated sentence ir not a p. 201 . The Honorable Wiley L. Cheatham, page 5 (~-48) final conviction which would eerve to enhance the punishment for a second conviction. Therefore, a person who received a probated renteocc under Article 725(b), Section 23(c), V. T. P. C., may receive a second proheted sentence before the expiration of the period of probate for the prior sentence, before he has concluded hir period of probation by lapse of time or hae had the period altered by order of the court. Very truly your*. General of Teur APP&qVED: lb--d-w DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee