Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN 11 Honomblo 9. C. smith Coullt~AttorneJ BosqlJoCounty Herldlan, Texas Dear Sir: of this department, purchasing agent of the Comnls- printed sheets for an exact duplicates &a of trust used by Uhen ona of those record ln the office of 888 this prfnted fom, e names, the description of the such other blanks as may be neces- the regular statutory recording fee trument. . . . t1y a local represeJntatireof ml. k has contended that the clerk has no legal right to charge the ngular fees alloved for recording the parts 02 these instrument8vhlch the countr has had printed, but should only &args for the parts vrltten in, such as the description of the lands, etc. ln b;i!~t3~f&ii!i tay::if!t ~na~~~~&~#i~ the instrument filed for wcord, I have advised that the clerk has the right to colleat the regular statu- tory fvo allourd for the recor@.ng of the sntlrr ln- atrument .’ 6-14 -. Pononblr 8. 0. Smith, wgv 2 Artlolo 6591, lkv1s.d Civil Statutes o? Texas, ,pkovides8 %ouat~ alorks shall k the ncorden for thr'lr nspoative oouatl#rI thor shll protido and ko+ln their offlaos voll-bound books in vhich thq shall resold 811 instmment8 of vr lting ltborired or re- Qulrmd to be ma0H.d in t&e oount~ clerk’s office in the mumop bonizaft~r protldod,* hrtialv 6595 or said strtutes grovides~ “&ah moorder sball rithout dolay, rroord every laetrkaat of vritlag .athorir.d to k noorded by blm, vhloh ir deposltui vltb him for moord, vlth the 8uk- amIlodgeeats,proofs, lfiidarits rod o~rtificatu thnto lttaohod, in the ardor dopo8ited for noord br lntOr ir th*l y VO?d fOP VOrd a a iOtter d HOPlOttOP, a a not at the root of the meopd the how a# the dry 9 o the mntb and year vhon the lnstrumoat so retaorded vas doposited ia hi8 offloe for reoo~.* APtiOiO 3930, m*riSSd OiVii SktUtSS, PPOViding fOP oortain fur to k neoived by clerks of the county oourt, pro- vides, uoag other things, the folloving: •Ro40*din~all *pa's requlW o? poxwitted by lav to be reoorded, not othervise provided fop, In- eludw cvatlficatvand seal, for o&oh 100 vords--- 151. %arlag fully eonsidrnd rour mawat, lt appears that you have oo+nctl~ ldvlsod the olork la thv pramlaos. statutvr provide for the reoordfng of la- strmeats 8Uch of t?ust aad p~seribo the iv* fop such sarvic*. DO laaguqa in thuo statutes to indimte thS Lagis~ton intez4.d suoh re.8payable cmlt rep uah 100 vords (Lo- t-11 aopiod bl hand or bf the t ~vrltrr. MO Qb hod br vhlah suah Iaatmoats aball be veoordo$ is spaolflad. !n vhat**or UnnOP the olork eaten vuoh ia8trumntr of vritiag authoriced and de- positad vltb blm for roverd, he is nqulmd c@y to take tha rlthout delay in tha ardor doposited, utd utor thm vord for VOPd and letto:,for l*ttor. It is, thorofota, the oonsldorwt opinion of this dvpapt- meat the aaullt~ that alerk 18 wlt1t1ea to eblqp the rtatuto in for noordiag duds of trust used hr tha ?oderrl kad &ii KoionomblsY. C. ;imith, pa&e ) 'oustonwithout suoh far8 being lbitsd to thosr’kXb8 YOUr8 very trulY,