Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

E ORNEY GENERAI. OF -XAS Grover Sellere -ON ATTORNEY GENERA=. HonorableR. W Cal'Rrt Couuty Attorney Hill County Hlllnboro,Texas Dear Sir: OpinionNo. O-6878 R.3: Authorityof the Comnle- elonera'Court of Hill county to appointa mqnager for * county owned airport. We have receivedyour letterof recent date In whloh you make the follovlngInquiry: "HillCouuty owne certain land on which the CommleeiouereCourt of HiXCounty proposesto build au airportunder and by virtue of the authoritycontainedIn Artlale 126911, V. A. C 5. !CheCourt doee not vleh to operateand manage the airportafter it Is built end has asked me for an opinionon the followingqueet1one: "1. Hay a Comisslonere Court lease a ooun~y owned airportto an lndlrldualor lndl- vldualefor a stipulatedrental? "2. May a Comiaelonere Court appointa manageror mmagera of a county owned alr- port and oontractwith each manager or ramgem to pay him or them a pertientsge of the receiptsfrcunsuch airportae ocp- pensatlonfor his or their eeniose? "I am diepoeedto answer qneetlonNo. 1 above 'uo'and questiongo. 2 'yes'for the reaeonehereinafteratated but I should like to hare your opinionIn the premlsee. "It Is axiomaticthat a Colrrmleslonere Court la a court of limitedjurlsdlotioa and hae no power except that oonferredby the Conetitutionor leglelatire act or neoeeearllyInferabletherefrom. Landmanvs. eon. R. W. Calvert,page 2, O-6878 Stste, 97 S. W. (21 264 (Writ refused.) Howard vs. HendersonCounty, II6 S. W. (2) 479 (Writ refused). It followsthat e countyhas no power to establish,meiatalnend operateeu airportexcept under authorityand in the msnner providedby Article 126911,V. A. C S. "Iieoessarily,the power to establishm airport and to opereteIt lmpliedlyauthorizess oommlesioners court to appointsome suitableperson to manage and operateIt. In my opinion,It does not follow,however, that the power to lease such countypropertywould exist becausetheoretically, at leaet,this would result la the leasingof county propertyfor privateprofit. "It s*ens to me furtherthat * proper oonstruotlon of the leglslstlveact above referredto exoludss:.the power of the CommiseionersCourt to leaseairportproperty. In this oonnection,I oall attentionto the fact that ParagraphD of Article 126921 grantsthe Cwslaeioners Courts of the severs1countiespaver to lease airports to 'any Incorporated city or nunicipalltywithin auch county or to the federalgovernment.'The sane pare- grsph confersupon s city the right to lease en alr- port to * county. PsragrsphE furtherauthorizesthe governingbodiesof cities to lease '---toany other person,firm, or corporation,to oarry out any pm-pose necessaryor incidentalto nationaldefenseor training Incidentalthereto'but no such power is grantedto Cosmiseionere Courts. Since thin power is specIfIcally grantedto governing bodies of cities and is not granted to oosmissionerscourts the statutewould be construed to deny the power to commissionerscourts." Article 126911, Vernon'sAnnotatedCivil Statutee,is In part *e follows: "Section1. A-That the governingbody of say incorporatedcity In this State may receivethrough gift or dedication,and IS hereby empoweredto ac- quire,by purchasewithout condemnationor by pur- chase throughoondemnstionproceedings,end there- sitar maintsiaand operatees an airport,or lesoe, or sell, to the FederalGovernneat,tracts of lend eitherwithin or without the corporatelimitsof such city and within the county in which such city Is situated,end the Commissioners' Court of any countynsy likewiseacauire,maintainand overate for like purposetractsof land within the lirltr _ .- Hon. R. W Calvert,page 3, O-6878 of the oolauty. "D- In additionto the power herein granted,the Ccamiseioners' Court of the aeveraloonutleeof thin State are hereby authorizedto leaeeany airuortthat may be acquiredby the county,as herein provided,& any 1ncorDOMted Oity or muniOiDalitywithin ruch county,or to the FederalGovernment,for the purpose of malntalnlngand operatingan airport;and provided furtherthat any incorporated city having acquired land for an airport,or an airport,under the authority of this Act, shallhave the right to lease said land or said airportto the oouuty In which said incorporated city of located. “* l * “Sec . 3. Aw airportacquiredunder and by virtue of the terms of thin Act ehall be under the management and controlof the governingbody of the city or the Comminsionere' Court of the countyacquiringthe same, which ie hereby exDresal.y authorizedand eKaDOWered to improve,rcriatain and conductthe same as au alrDort, and for that Dur~oseto make and providethereinall neceesaryor fit‘improvements and~faoilities and to fix euch reasonablechargesfor the uee thereofas such governingbody or Coxmissionere' Court shall deem fit, and to make rules and regulationsgoverningthe uee thereof. All proceedsfrom such chargesshall be devotederclnsirelyto the maintenance,upkeep, lm- provementand operationof such airportand the facll.ltiee, ltruoturee,and improvementstherein. a ." (underscoring ours) In *nswer to your first questionwe refer you to 'ourOpinionlio. O-3865,a copy~ofwhich Is herewithenclosed,wherein it states: "It Is our opinionthat the Cwsmlssionera' Court'has no authorityto lease an airportto any party exceptthose set out in paragraphD of Section 1, Article l26ph." Thus, the Cosmlssionera'Court oan on4 leasean airport to "any incorporatedcity or munioipalltywithin suoh county or the Federal Government." It Is, therefore,the opinionof this departmentthat the Commissioners'Court cannot lease a county owned airportto an individual. The Cmlssloners' Court is a court of limitedJurisdictionand has on4 suoh powers as are expresslyprovidedfor by the Conetltutloaand laws of this State or reasonablyimpliedtherefrom. Van Rosenbergv. Low&t, 173 S. W. 508, 511,writ refused;Foster Y. City of Waco, ll.3Tex. Ron. R W. Calvert,page 4, O-6878 352, 355, 255 5. W. 1104;Roper Y. Hall, 280 S. W. 289, 291. The CormIs- sloners'Court has the impliedauthorityto do the thlllgs reasonable necessaryto dischargethe expressduties or powers conferredupon It. City RationalRank v. PresidioCounty @Iv. App.), 26 S. W. 775, Roper v. Hall, supra,Ton RosenbergY. Lovett,eupra, 11Tex. Jur. 566. In the oase of Van Rosenbergv. Lovett,the oourt after statlaRthe foregoing rules said ou page 5145 "It would be a vain thing to imposeupoa auyone a duty, and deny hip the peaus wherebyhe could performsuch duty." It will be noted that the Commieslonera'Court is given the express power and authorityby Artiole l269h,snpra, "to aoqulre,maintainand operate"*u airport. It Is common knowledgethat a manager of an airport is necessaryto the maluteuanceand operationof an airport. It is, there- fore, the opinionof this departmentthat Artiole l26yh,eupra,confers upon the Comniasioners' Court the impliedauthorityto appointa mauagsr for the county owned airport. It Is within the sound discretionof the Comissioners' Court to determinethe amount of compensationof the manager for his servioee,and whether such compensationshall be a salaryor a commission. We wish,-topoint out, however,that Section 3 of Artiole l269h, supra, states that all proceedsfrom ohargeederivedfrm the operation of the airportshall be "devotedexolusire4 to the malutenauce,upkeep, improvementand operationof sash airport." This In effectmakes all money derivedfrom the operationof the airportoouuty'aoney subjectto a limiteduse. Article 1709,V. A. C. S., providesthat *the county treasurershall receiveallinonlerbelongingto the countyfrom whateversource they may be derived,and pay and apply the same as requiredbylaw, In such mauuer as the Comalssiouers'Court of his countymay requireand direct." It Is, therefore,the opinionof this departaent‘that before any mosey may be paid the manager of the airportArticle I709, as well as the budget law (Article689a-II),must be compliedilth. We hereby expressour appreoiatioufor your discussionon the ques- tions submitted. V-Y -4 Yom, J. 0. Davis, Jr. Aeslstant BY John Reeves JR:IJ