Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OFTHEAlTORNEY GENERALOFTEXA8 AUSTIN Honorable George H. Sheppar& Comptrollerof Pub110 Aooounte Austin, Texas Dear Slrr opinion 100.O-3998 Rer Expense aooounte or members of Pu?&lo SaretT aommltwJioa We hare reoelved your letter or Septmber 17, 194l. lrdrloh we quote ln part as rollowe: "A member ot the Commissionfiled with WEI departaanthlo expense naoount ror a rht #lO.OO per day, with no 1teimll;atlon or the amount expended. "Sinoe the l.mwJnoe 0r warrant In paylaalt or expenses is bawd upon the idea of reim- bursement or a refund or the aiuouhtaotually apent, is this departmentauthorized to reoog- nlge and pay the erpeme aooount or a number of the Oonnairrslonthat 1s eubmitted on a itit $10.00 per diem basie4 "The appropriationror the payment of this ox- penae, or wage, le In the Qaneral AppropriationBill for the DepaHmant ot PubI. Safety, Does the rider limiting the expenees or State employees to ti.00 a day oontrol ln thla lnetanoe?* Artlole &.J.3(2), Y~rnon*s Annotated Clvll Statute8 (Aote 1935, 44th Leg., R.S., p. &.I&,oh, 181 % 31, oreates the Publlo Serrioe Qmrnlselonr Bald article xeade in pat as r0limet Donorable George H. Sheppard - Page 2 "Art. 4413 (2). Creation of the Pub110 sarety c0mii~sion -. . In the appointmentof the members of the C&mlsslon, the following quallflcatlons among others aball be observed: Knowledge or laws; sxprlence In the enforocmentof law; honesty, integrity; eduoation, training and executive ability. They shall serve wlthout oompensatlon, but shall be entitled to reoaive Ten (810.00) Dollars per day as an expense eooount and neo- essary mileage In the perrormanoeof their duties, suoh expense ellowanoe shall not exoeed Fire Hundred ($500.00)Dollars annually ror eaoh member." The question now presents itself :ðer the Com- mlaslonsrs are entitled under the statute to the flat sum of'$10.00 for each day spent In the disoharge of their ot'ilolalduties whether that amount Is entirely expended or not. That la not the Interpretationwhloh we plaoe on the Aot. It a Commissionerspent less than $10.00 per day and ~8s p&Id the full sum of $10.00, then that amount over whet was actually apent would not be an expanse. It would be either ciform of oompensetionor CLgratuity. The Aet speolrlcallyprovides that the Oommlsalonersshall serve without oompensatlon, and a holding that It Is a gratuity would be In dir8Ot violation or Seotlon 51 or Artlole III, Constltutlon of %‘exh8, which prohibits the granting of pub110 moneys. T&US, we think It olear that it wae the leglalatlve Intent that a cobmlssloner 1s entitled to reimbursementfor his actual expenses only, with the limitation that he oannot spend more than &lc.OO for any one day or $500.00 for any one year and claim reimbursementior the exoees. you ash whether under subseetlon 12(g) or Seo- tlon 2 of the current departmentalapprOpriation bill Bonorahle George H. Sheppard - Page 3 (Aot8 1941, 47th Leg., R. S., S. B. 423) the llmltetlon of $4.00 applies In this lnstanoe. Subaeotlon 12(g) or Seotlon 2 provides as follows: uAll employeastraveling at the expense of the State are hereby llmlted to the smount or Four ($4.00) Dollars per day expenses for meals end lodglngg It being speolflaallypro- vided that the employees shall obtain reoelpt ror all amounts expended ror all Items or lodging and other expense exoept amaW, and ahall 'filesaid reoelpta tith their expense aooounta,whloh expense aooountamust be duly ltemioed end sworn to; end the State Oorap- troller 1s heraby expressly prohibited tram paying any expense aooounta whloh are not ltemlaed.andsworn to tindeooompenledby reoelpta as herein protIded.* Subaeotlon 13 (i) of the anme aeotlen reads in part as r0uowf3t "It is expressly pmrlded that th8,pro- rlalone of Subaeotion1Eg of this Aot *nth referenoe to llailtatlon0r amount or travaling expense shall not apply to the Governor, the Lieutenant-Qmernor, and the merabers ai the ooamiaalonawho reoelre nm a* *en traveling In or out of the Stats. .'. gB wphaals aupplled) As the member8 of the Publio Safety Ooamklasion reoelre no salary or per diem, they sre sroepted iran the operation of Subaeatlon12(g), as to the limitation Of $4.00 per dep for meal8 end lodging. ArtloLe 4w3 (2) also authorize8 the rehburse- nent of the Commlaaionersfor neoesaary mileage. It Is elmentery that berore publlb moneys W be withdr&wn from the Treeaury, the LegialetUr%muat m&e Honorable CIeorgeH. Shepparci- Page 4 an appropriationtherefor. It is &early wlthln the pro- rinoe of the Legislaturein appropriatingfuada for oer- tain purposee to provlde the mannor or payment and tie attaah oondftionsto their expendftmee. see opluion no. O-1426. Subeeotion12(r) or geotlon 2 or the appropria- tion aot authorizesreimbureamantfor nileage traveled and providea the method ror ooapputingthe aam. 8ubseation13 0r Seotlon 2 requires aertain inrormation 10 renderlq expense aooounts 'before any expense aoooun8.ehal.lbe paid tram ap ropriatlonsherein -de.* Althmgh Sub- eeotlon 13(1P axoepte the erimns nema4 rran the pco- rfsions or Suhsotfon 12(g7 dth rereraaae to the limIta- ,tiim0r aaumt, it dow not lsoept tho& rrom that part nor ~h~t~bsestlop whloh requirea itemization or ,expense a@- . We bekiere that *stat0 emplorrW@m us04 lsithe approprlatLonbill oowcs all offioer8, reprrrssntatirer, and auentts or the State. xr thfu wore aot alvwly oh0 legirrlatlre fntent, then the ina.lnrlo~ or SM?meot~o~13(f) In the b2l.l would be a foolish sob. Xt la our opinion that these proriotora.8 are blnding upon the mbers Of the Fublio Gafot~~C~eaion. !Phererore, tho expense aooeunts of the Cormeis5imers met be ltemleed before th6 Omptroller 56 authoriasd to pay the sama. Very truly yeurn ,