Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE Oc; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. OF TEXAS AUSTlN RoaordM R. A. Kolnrrt, Chrfrmua Oirll Jnri~prwlmo~ Codttro stat. Sonat. Aurtln, Terar lng to the lrat prom+ goa of the mteral Dir- ty, to@t%er xith the Corey hcrcby oooetltutrd & Juvenile 1t till br noted thbt s4otion 1 of Mi4 AOOt, 4xo4pt for tb pop\ZLatiow braokbt8 sod th el!aoWA Of the 6.t~d rdary or each of the Dlttrict Zu.i~r on the bosrd, ir Wb6tantlillly the a- &,, ml010 5139, ReVi8Oa ohi1 8tbtUt6% 192% SOO- tlon 2 of Rouse 0111 No. 536 i8 a copy of Artlob 5140, Rerl8rd Iioaorablr R. A. dIllCTt, pbge 2 . CiYii St&&CO, 1925, hrd soOtiOn 3 Of HOU8a niii h’0. 536, 18 a copy or a+tlolo 5141, fwircd Clrll Statxtsr of 1925. tjeotlon )a or IIOUM nil1 1~0. 536 repeala ltwr or partr OS lwr la oonfllot with raid Bill ad 3eotlon 4 or raid Bill oortthlm en laxrgency olaufm. In our o~.lnion, this El11 i8 Wxonstitutlotsl tc- cruaa it lr in violttion 0r ,rtlcle 3, reotloa 56 or tt.c Corirtltutlon or fw~j w:.ich g~ovliler i3 ptrt es roilon-0: . “seoticn 56. Th4 Legi~lut'~e Ehtll not, - except (LKIott&nlaa provided in thle Conatltution, ptt36 tLy 1OCUi Or 0~6CiG1 lhw, tuthOriZ%t *. * + mguitticg th6 nrreira 0r oo~tlt~, cities, tcwna, vimafs or sobwl dlctrlctr; w* l 1 lCreating orfloe8, or prercrlblr.6 t!s pxcrrs fd dutite4 0r ‘0fri0fr6, ln 00~tics, oitlwi, tome, rlrotlcn or cctxd dlstrlctr; ne 6 l ::C:6::~Gl County 16 tr.c mly Comity ~kz:c!i CW.Ca K!t:.:.? the ;opittlon brtchtc c.ct fort:? ln % se Slil KG. 53G u96r th6 1510 ce.m%. ;:'ir,ce the :Jnltcd ?tbt6S C6tB'iP ia tf.%+n Only or&t aech ten yews, a!;e bill ~111 be tfl~llc~kle mly to !bLezrer? Coaity t .r a Ferl-C of sl:.ost ten ystra. . . 71 Eooorrblr R. A* Xainwt, Phe5 3 The hot that the RiU 18 5jqdlorble onl to HoZonr.an County 18 not nr05rarPll~ fatal to it5 va 1 ldlt~. 85x5~ 0ount;l td Tymn, 128 Tex. 223, 97 8. X. (26) 4t7. Xouwer the Court in ~etbrmlalng whrthrr 5 l&u 15 8 5p55lal or locd law will look to ita rubstrtiom ar,4 prsotlotl opcre- tlon rathertt;m to It8 fora, end the olrrrlilo5tlon uuat br broth lough to lnoludo a 8ub5tbntlal olass a&d mu5t br, ba56d 00 ~hbrrotsrirtior legitimht4ly dl5tln&.Ii6blag ruoh o:es8 frca otherG with r8sFuot to the publlo PUr~GC reu&.t to ha 5oconpllrhad by the j.roposod 15ci8lstlOn~ In th5 CUIO of J. h. Klllw vb Thm County oi Kl Pa80, d5oided by the Suprrze Court on April 23, 1941, (not yet rrportrd) Chlrr Ju8tlce hloxumr srldt .. . *Jlasort to pulatlon braoketr toor the p~p080 r axing 5ublo0t5 r0r iegisi6ti0n or 01~55 la prrdorlbls whsrr tbs rPr584 oi populatlos la brord enough to lIlOluil6 or 5e&rrgtto 5 5ab5tluitlal $1~~58 and Wber5 thr pOpUlhtiO5 b5t.r5 50% real T6btlOll te the rub;oot 0r Icgl5l5tloa ena afrord5 5 rrlr baa18 ror the olsrrltloation. It hb5 be5a iOgitiSttSi)7 S&PiOYb(L in tiXiLg fW5 Or OiciQr in oertrla otsa8 (Clerk v. Finley Comptroller, 93 Tex. 178). but 4~05 than it 18 p6rn!fslblr only v&err tbr 83rsad of po;ulf&lon 18 rubatantlal adi6 Otiv- rlolrat to lnolule a rcsl alar8 rlth ob~.rcotsrl5tlc8 wtloh rer5mably dlctlngulsh it &X6 otharr a8 tp- pIi to t33 oontomp~ct6~ Ie~?nl6tloa, rub kirora6 a rtlr ttr:s ror r2.e 0iteidriceti0n. Zexrr Couty v,. ~ycsn, ~7 e. c. (za) 467.“ Ii EOUSS Ail :;o, 536 n-err to bocoze a ltn, the situ- tioa with r6r6IeLCc t0 ,‘UVC::i~O BOr.Fb8 WOUld ht 66 iOi&78l So ocur.ty h&vine a po~uletion or lbas thtn W3x),000 lnbahlthntr would hare a tuvcnllr Board, e x o 8p t l osutty havi~. l pOpUttlo& OS betwern 66 000 sued 65 060 15h~bit5nt5, Suoh , a o o u nty, unbr the provldos8 of Xdcle 5139a, Ven;on*r J.nnota- Xonorablr ted civil statutrr, bate. 1939 ?btb tceialttute, s~eoiaz Lawr, ?a&0 853, SrotlOn ll W0Uld hW0 l SU?CIIil~ Board a.ad odOb Of the DiCtFiOt ~ll&pQO DO!8rriQIf thlr Bosrd wouaa bo ODtitlQd t0 lD dditiOD61 Cd~rY Ot 3 $ c@.w pQT UUIUM. At tha tin. tur law weI, paeeea, 1n 1999, aalvrrtoa COuntl~ war the only sounty aodD wltbln tbr pOFUbtiOll breiokotr, end at the p&Stemt c1aa 8lr:CO tl!. 1910 CIOEua, thcro 18 a0 county whloh oolsc8 within there braokets. Under the provldonr of tzousr Ml]. no. 536, W.crtm.n County bdne the-only oounty - hering a populntlon oi between 103,&00 and 105,000 inhabltar?tr, would htivt a ?wenile Ib*ti wd etch oi th Dlatrict Zuif;ea on tnlcr fmtrd would drrn an e4Aitlonal seliwy OS $300.00 & l yea r * Tn omntits oontddnc nom tt&E X05,000 Lnbcbltactr, 3letrlot Ju4pr sortrlng on the Jurenllr !Wrd, Udrr thr pro- Yid.On Of f&iOlU $139, hQvjea3 “IOil stCtUtOfI Of 1925, WOUu reo~iwi m dditionrl arlery or -!l,YXLoo: It ~511 be note? that rooorcung to the 1940 oenme, ttst!. csuntSes rengr $8 population rrwt 106,059, in the 0868 af illaal.t;o County, to 526,961, in the ctm of Kerris County. Under th tcreeol~. irate we ere 4 tk0 ogdnlon thtt $8 rlrlo it tbtt the yayoas oi tbt 8111 16 to hlf@@ out x&mm County ror ape&l letlrl+tlon and that the Bill 18 in reality a loom1 nnd cproltl fzw. lo: fbla reeeon, lr* br@ Of the opinion tbtt at d 5111 lr utxonrtitutCanal, being in violetlen of thQ imrloione oi Artids 3, soction56, ot 0~ state Constltutlon. Very triily yours -/By Jsa?rs P. Cart ,.,. . . .. ..-...T& : sole tact ._ v_..=.. >.: 1.--.-e--.. _...'.___ JS’U:U’