Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE An’ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN EonorableE. P..Wapbrll CotuityAttorney ?isber county Noby, Texas %a81 sin ,' _ sd dated 'day14th. 1831, recorded in Vol. 90 on page 545 of the'Records of Flsber county, a deed aa8 xaxde%o 34% aores 'oflend, through the Farm of W. S. CleYelaad. This deed me nade to the County Judge aa8 his suoaeasors in ofrice, for a cash considerationor $700.00, %ow after this ded was mde along v.$th several other Deeds to land for tbls Blgbt-of- %ay, the State E.i@way Coamlsafon changed its -. I - 668 . "mw while tillsDoed was 2uldo to the county Judz$ ot fisherCauntjr aad his ~~ooeaa~m Sn orrice, It was pr00urra at the epeoial inmuioo ma tWeoticm or the Ytato Xi&may cefazulet?l~n for atate Ifi&way l?o.7% “yqm the.& w, ;;*Clt%Y!3lfmd who sold this tr-aatof lena.to Plsher Gauajj, has mdo a aon- tradt of land ~ofvhioh this traot to seiU -tfis i%33 aoreo is a part, but he or 00~~88 aannot fmks.. .tltleto the land until the Iioednatter is oloarefl it?." 3nsoB upon tha abtive faotiipea ask our opinloa .'~: di;oha5 t1t1o and oontrol or ti:isplmpert~. we, W, 9. Clovelend,and wlt0, i20~ie or the county 0r Fisher, mats or Terns, oonslderatiocior tha WZ.Rof BOYBIIhundred . (&%OolirO)Eidlaro to ug paid and.c+eour& by i%ohar CounC7,~Tsxao,ae I?ollowet~ -~. _ .~~_ -__-_-._--_.-.------..---- ‘. - 669 I 70 In Zitaher. county, Texa8. . . .* - ;;‘o vioh to thank you ror suberitting’a m4mrAAdum this question. '&%have orrrtSul.ly eYA?dAOd the 9~,7tad tharaln as tie11+x8other pertinent proYb ‘iiile 116 or tha &wised cl011 stntut.toa as AineAded. "All deeds, &Fante rnd oonveyanoeehe+ tofare or hereafterJade an& duly~aairnorladge4, or proven, and reoordedae other doeb¶s0r iwn- 7ajanoe, to my otnuxty,or to the courts or comlaoioners Or, aog aowty, or 0ny other aax- ROA or persona, by whatover iom of oonvayanoe, ror the we 5nb b0writ of any oounty, qu0.l bo go04 eAd Vtiid to Teat in suoh @tmnty'in.fas aiQplo or otherwise all suoh right, title, intersot imd estate he the $mntor la ouy auoh inetmmmt had at the tipisof the U4OtltiOA t!Wsof in tho landa oonveyed end.ma intQa6od thereby tObe ~~. ooaveyOd.Q xrti101.5 1.577, E.C.S, read5 40 P0mmi1 c .-- 67 Eooorable8.,F. CAmpbell, Bage 4 conveyud. Nothing don,tainsa In thIs~artIole shall authorize any oum~&3rIonersoourt to dispose of anr.landsgiven, donated or granted to such odunt~ for the 3upose of eduaatkon in any othar mxter than shall be directed by law." In this oonnsotion,na quote IroD the ease if L,lSzlO county V. KJUnTl48,~B~~l.,eo E.-UT. 549, as fal1owB.t I . The eount~ cszulct dlveat itl3el.f oi title ~~a'l.and sxoapt in the method prescribedby the-ZXattrts.Fergason v. Ealrsell, 47 Tex. 421. It cannot donate any real eatate oS the county to any perscnfor any purpose. llhelanguage of Chief JusticqFisher, speakingSor:thIs court, In ths case OS Llano Co. v. Johnson~(decrided.’ Jab. 16, 1895) 29,S.W. 30, is peculiarly : a2plIoable to'the Sacts OS the casesat'bar and, we quote the saze as decisive 04 the quest1on 'before us; *The commIseioners*court of the countr,oseu~y towards it property only,a trust relation,audtihay OEUlonly dIt3pose oS.It3 property In the manuer required by law, and Sor purpases~thatoru in keeping with the trust they' represant. .'l!hey hare no~rlght to donate the eountp groserty, or diapoee OS it, so as to virtually arsouotto a donation. St is 'atrust eetate,'andthe prinoiples of equity wIllnot pa&t thsm to braliberal and gslnarous,with propertg,thepdo.~notown,.andwhioh they hold In tru0t for p~blio.plrpafm?.' . . ." -ft ie ok opI&n that only Fisher County~maydispose of the ~propertyIn question. Burther,,saIdproparty aan be disposed OS only in Ireaforinity with ArtIol~e157.7,supra. NEY GIW~L Lee Shoataw Assistant L;:eaw