Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Hon. Char~lesFt.Martin County Auditor Harrison County Marshall, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-1866 Re: Under Article 3899 wou‘lda constable compensated on a fee basis be en- titled to deduct as an expense ~of office gasoline and oll'and up-keep for his automobile for and during the year? Your request for opinion has been received and care- fully considered by this department. Article 3899 (a), Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, reads in part as follows: "At the close of each month of his tenure of office each officer named herein who is com- pensated on a fee basis shall make as part of the report now required by law, an Itemized and sworn statement of all the actual and necessary ex- penses incurred by him in the conduct of his of- fice, such as stationery, stamps, telephone, pre- miums on officials' bonds, including the cost of surety bonds for his Deputies, premium on fire, burglary, theft, robbery Insurance protecting public funds, traveling expenses and other neces- sary expenses. The Commissioners' Court of the county of the Sherlff's residence may, upon the written and sworn application of the Sheriff stating the necessity therefor, purchase equip- ment for a bureau of criminal identlflcatlon such as cameras, finger paint cards, inks, chemicals, microscopes, radio and laboratory equipment, filing cards, filing cabinets, tear gas and other equipment in keeping with the system in use by the Department of Public Safety of this State or the United States Department of Justice and/or Bureau of Criminal Identification. If such ex- penses be incurred In connection with any particu- lar case, such statement shall name such case, Ron. Charles R. Martin, page 2 O-1866 Such expense account shall be subject to the audit of the County Auditor, if any, otherwise by the Commissioners' Court; and if it appears that any Item of such expense was not incurred by such of- ficer or such item was not a necessary expense of office, such Item shall be by such auditor or court rejected, in which case the collections of such item may be adjudicated in any court of competent jurisdiction......." Article 3891, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, reads in part as follows: "Each officer named in this Chapter shall first out of the current fees of his office pay or be paid the amount allowed him under the provisions of Article 3883, together with the salaries of hls asslstants and deputies, and authorized expenses under Article 3899, and the amount necessary to cover costs of premium on whatever surety bond may be requir- ed by law. If the current fees of such of- fice collected in any year be more than the amount needed to pay the amounts above speci- fied, same shall be deemed excess fees, and shall be disposed of in the manner hereinafter provided......." This department has repeatedly held that a constable operating upon a fee basis is authorized to deduct the neces- sary expenses incurred in performing the duties of his office including traveling expenses out of his excess fees of office provided he complies with Articles 3899 and,38ql,~supra. See opinion of this department dated October 11, 1937, written by Hon. James N. Neff, Assistant Attorney General, and recorded in.Vol. 378, pages 555-6, Letter Opinions of the Attorney Gen- eral of Texas, and other opinions of this department. "Gasoline. oii and.a reasonable amount of 'UD-keeDB5' would clearly come within the meaning of travel- ing expenses in this situation. You are therefore respectfully advised that it is the opinion of this department that a constable compensated on a fee basis would be entitled to deduct from his excess fees as an authorized expense of office, the,necessary traveling ex- penses, including the expense of gas, oil and a reasonable amount of "up-keep", incurred by the constable in the discharge of hIi official duties , provided he complied with Articles 3899 and 3891, supra. - - Hon. Charles R. Martin, page 3 O-1866 Very truly yours ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS By s/Wm. J. Fanning Wm. J. Fanning ,Asslstant WJF:AW Approved FEB 24, 1940 s/W. F. Moore FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL Ap~oved Opinion Committee By s/Bm Chairman