Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEX+ -, .- “0 SOl.“.,c..,Ol ,. .* . . .**...a,.0 . . . ..-.“...“,.L -* ” a.I Y” L.,. .PS.O”.. .I .I. .,.a.... . ..‘... . .I... . ..1...“1 . . kionorabh Oeorgcr D. l&r&m, k'u~a C prordta purohass or 011 by tendering muo to Oomaon pWaha8@r?" Xn rurthar explanation or your qu*stl~no, you 8tat0 Ln your letter to Col. Thoiapsown thct c3llomaes 011 Cospanjr haa drlll04 borne twoaty woU8 on land Ln Crookett County belonging to chr i&irsralty of Toxa8, end that Cllor6oes 00 Company &s -hut06 0. >lpa 1150 imm thoao relle to YoCaesy, whom a .@8W@ttiw 18 Wde With &fU&lO ?i&~ &iUO dhlQUU~. Tour quastXo58 ad8ume that Rumble ?lp* Ltm Company ti fn f&at a 00-5 pWoha8or, und thle opinion 18 bawd 011that This foot 1S8UO 18 f&pOrtmt, beomxm, Ud8rthO zrao m tsth0 United 3tatOk Dlotrlot court in Nx0ma Hatural m c8..V& ~~ibWOd OOdB8iO5 Of T'C)XEti, 69 hd. (2) ?m, it WOti k RWOLL8titUtiO5d. ta Ppply the OOnPIY)II ptlroh8W 8tatUt. to o plpo liar which 3~~8 not ln ract a oommo5 puroboaer. A8 pOi5tUd OUt in the OpitiO5 by &ire 6OOtt ikd508, ths prlnolpd statutea rrlmtlng to conxm oarrlor plpe4Unoa are iU-tiOl.8 6018, 6019, mYf& 6040. 6041, 6046, 6oolb, 6oc8, pnd 6049a of V8lXkOn'a Aclnotete4 Civil Stututse. With rdurenoe to FUr fhOt qUe8ttOli, tb PD8t ~tii505t 8tatUte8 - dodo, bolb, arri 604Qa, 660. 0. hrtio1.s 6040 prprida8, la part, that a ooamon oarrlar pipe line wsha.ll be raqulre4 to lnrtP31 and mnintaln fooi+litlaa for the rwelpt and dollro~y 02 oruda pstrolowu of patx-058 at au pOi5W 05 8UOh pipe 115..- . rit101u 6045 ;rrOYidO8 t&at 50 oa6!!& arrler plpo llm "8hn11diMr~ta tnicwaenoragdlut ahlgpn ip rrgordto iaollltler rur5i8h~d or ssrolce rondurmL" shotion 8 or utiols 60491 prorlao8 that ti oomon oarriur plpa line8 8hdl be oomaoa puroho8on & tht 00 Om- -5 PUOh8er 8hd~diAOriEhlata i5 it8 p-.@8"bt-a r805 a8 4 & li58t l5Cltb r in th w -00 tWUO5 rid k 8 15 this 8t6teag It i8 tqO? th18 8tatIitO that tha ~W8tkU,Oi th0 jU8tbWbt r-b&8 or any ai8oriml2lat,l~n18 to k dotorminecl b thm mm.m8e ~COtis- dJXl -taking into 0050iarmti0n the pmduot md Agcl or rrll8 la raip00ti~0 fhxa8 0nd ti ottar propa wtolr8.- Xe ugruo with the o~nolua105 erpree8.d by Kr. Soott iklnea thnt the iarogoln6 etotutory provisions are applioablo by or douorable George D. korgun, i'age S their ttxprean terms to producers in dirrerent fields a8 well 88 to produoero wlthln the came rleld, and that under these stututee a common purchaser 18 prohibited from making any unjust in- reasonable dl8orlaWation aa botweon fields ln thla state. Wa alao agree nlth Xr. Cainea' co5cluslon with referenoe to rour 8eOOnd questlon,.and it 18 our opinion that a proboar in a genoral area served by a common purohesor oan toroe prorata purchase or 011 by tendering Same to a common purohaeor, a88uml5g, of oourse, that the produoer oompllee uith,the rules of the Rall- road Conm~l88lon a8 to the quantity and quality of the 011 whloh is tendered. We believe that thle oonolu8lon neoesearlly r0U0wa from the prohibition agaln8t dl8OrimiMtiO5, because ratable pur- ohaalng 1s the only method of avoiding a dleorlmlnation between produoore. Yours very truly ATTORNEY CENE;?AL OF TKXAS' JemsP.Hart A88leta5t JPH:rXS