Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN . Honorable J. H. O'Neall County Attorney Swisher Goturty Tulle, Texae Dear Sir: e nmxlmum aelarlsu the rs ooul6 pay thereeltee rrr 1954, lOSS, 1936, above-stated quertion bltanta aooording to ax ral&tiun la *. . . .In counties having aeseesed reluatioa of more them Pour &Hllios.Pfre Hundred. Thousand end One Dollare (#4,500,001) i&d less than Sir Uillloa Dollars ($6,000 000) eaoh ao;eaiueioner e&all reaeiv6,Fi.r8 Dal- lars (&.OO) per day for eaah de$%w~rved as oomiseiuner, and 6 like arpotmt u-he13 aoting afd/Qx-ofrit3io road tmper- intendent in hie CdSJSi6ll8r'S PF8oinOt, provided in no 8YWlt Shall his total WQWlZl?ltiOXA eXk306d 7!W81Pe <l- dred Dollars (#lUWf in sap at8 y8we* Honorable J. 11.O'Neall, June 12, 1939, Page 2 Article 2350 (1) reeihrias follows: "The salary of eaoh County Commlssloner and eaah County 3udc.emay be paid wholly out of the County Cen- era1 Fund, or, at the option of the Corvalssicnera Court, may be paid out of the County General Fund and out of the Road and Erldge Fund in the following pro- aort!ons: County Judge not to sxaeed seventy-five per cent (75$) of suoh salaries msy be paid out of the Road and Eridge Fund, and the reaelnder out of the General Fund of the County, and eaoh County Comm.issioner*s salary may, at the disorstlon or the C0mmi8slonore Court, all be paid out of the Road an6 Bridge Fund; provided thi8 SQ0tiOn ehall not apply exoept In OOuIItie8 where the oon8tltutlonal limit or twenty-five oents (25#) on the One Hundred Dollars~,($lOO) 18 levied for general purpo8e8.* The firet oalled se8s%On of the Forty-Third L8&&&re paeeed House Bill No. 88, Ohapter 88, whioh pr0Yides that: "'Xxoept in all oountie8 having an .assesead falua- tion or more than Five Nllllon Dollars ($5,000,000) an& leas than Five Mllllon Five Hundred Dollar8 ($~,SOO,OOO) aooordlng to the la8t preoeding.tax roll, 8808 oom- missioner shall reoelve an anql salary not to 4X0wa Tuelv~ Hundred Dollnrs ($1800). The a8se88ed valuation of Swisher Oounty.har been m0re than )5,500,000 for 8aoh of the above mentioned years. House Bill Ho. 86, 8upra. beoame 8ffeOtiYe Ootober R5, lY33. Ohapter 816, Aots of the Forty-Third .Legislature, Regular Se88ion, provides that: "The salary of the 8aid oommi8slonere shall be paid at least one-half out of th8~ Road and Rridg6 Fund but not to exoesd seventy-five (95%) per oent of 8ai& salary shall be paid out of aaid~fund and remaln- aer out of the General Fund of the Obunty. . . .* In view of the fOr8going statutea, you are respeativsly advised that it is the opinlo&%f this department that the maximum salaries for the members of ttieOommlsslonere~ Court of Swisher z;Ety has been $1,200 a year for the year8 1034 to 1936, lnolu- . In answer to your seoond qUe8tiOn, you are further ad- vised that from January 1, 1934, to hl&l8t 31, 1935, the c0mmzlseloners should have been paid at lea8t one-hslf and not to eXoeed three- i'ourths of their salary fr0m the Road and Bridge Fund and the ro- Honorable J. 9. O'Neall, June 12,,1939, Page 3 malnder frou the General Fund. From August 31, 1935, the effec- tive dale of Article 2356 II), the Coznmissioners'Court could within their discretion pay all of their salaries out of the Road and Erldge Fund; provided, that'Swisher County had levied the constitutional limit at twenty-five cents (25$) on the One Hundred Dollars ($100) valuation. Trusting thet the foregoing an8wers your inquiry,,we remain Your8 very truly AlTORNEY 0ENJTR.UOF TEXAS AWrGO AFTROYED: