OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN I:
i’, r
April 17, 1939
Eonorabla David
County Atto:mey
El F'sso,Texas
D6ar sir:
eatook and ran
The qumation is whether tha benefit OS thirr
hti0le plr0ri4145r0r th6 paptent 0f 0~1~ fifty par wit
regi6trati0n r6O 3.6 o6rt6l~~fn6t6noO6, applieil ,to tha
6itUation *hem a &Wr6OXl l-61666 ,-rtaia prOdUOt6 Ot Bi6
OWR 8Ibd al60 PUl-OhO666 JStOdlXOt6 Of Other tBITAOr6, OoW6ycl
and tr4lli6&Wrt6 both ~Ob66O6 Q? ~OdUOt6 to his oWlIOUI-
nery and after pTOO666in$ them in turn tranaport6 ttteate
market.
Ron. David E. LIulcahy,April 17~,1929, Fage 2 .
'~8do not believe that the stipulationof the
statute providingfor traneportatlonto market or other
points r0r sale or prooeming permit6 a person, in riret
operatinga commerolalenterprise suoh as a oannery, to
traneportthe produots of such oannery to market in a
tehlale regieteredunder Artlole 66756-6a. Nor do m,
believe it was intended to permit a person to transport
products purohasedtram others, with the aid of the oheap-
or lloense.
.wO aFo Or the OphiOIl, thar6fOm, thsatthe
kmfit6 of the Artiolo l00mao only to a pmmon who truI6-
pX't6 hi6 OWD pOdUOt6 to Mtk6t Or other @6t6 for 6610