NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ENOVA TECHNOLOGY CORP.,
Appellant
v
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS INC.,
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC,
Appellees
______________________
2016-1287
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-
00683.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
DARRYL MICHAEL WOO, Vinson & Elkins LLP, San
Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by
CHAO WANG; JANICE TA, Austin, TX.
DAVID J.F. GROSS, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minne-
apolis, MN, argued for appellees. Also represented by
LUCAS J. TOMSICH, JULIE WAHLSTRAND; CALVIN L. LITSEY,
East Palo Alto, CA; RICHARD M. MARSH, JR., Denver, CO.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 20, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court