Young v. Gandera

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 YVONNE YOUNG, 3 Plaintiff-Appellant, 4 and 5 WILLIAM YOUNG, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. No. A-1-CA-35907 8 REMEMBER ME WHEN and 9 NICHOLE GANDARA, 10 Defendants-Appellees. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY 12 Daniel Viramontes, District Judge 13 Yvonne Young 14 Lordsburg, NM 15 Pro Se Appellant 16 Nichole Gandara 17 Lordsburg, NM 18 Pro Se Appellee 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 GARCIA, Judge. 3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 5 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 6 {2} AFFIRMED. 7 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 __________________________________ 9 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 10 WE CONCUR: 11 _______________________________ 12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 13 _______________________________ 14 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge 2