In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 18-0579V
(not to be published)
HOLLY A. BURGESS, Personal,
Representative of the Estate of Chief Special Master Corcoran
Sharen Kraft
Petitioner, Filed: March 15, 2022
v.
Special Processing Unit (SPU);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Attorney’s Fees and Costs
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.
Colleen Clemons Hartley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
Respondent.
DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1
On April 23, 2018, Sharen Kraft filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that Sharen Kraft suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome as a
result of an influenza vaccine administered on October 4, 2015. (Petition at 1). On October
1
Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.
2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
14, 2021, a decision was issued awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the
Respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 57).
Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated January 31,
2022 (ECF No. 62), requesting a total award of $19,843.19 (representing $17,748.20 in
fees and $2,094.99 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, counsel for
represents that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (Id. at 2). Respondent
reacted to the motion on January 31, 2022, indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory
requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case, but deferring
resolution of the amount to be awarded to my discretion. (ECF No. 63). Petitioner did not
file a reply thereafter.
I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my
experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested
hours or rates.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Section
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I
award a total of $19,843.19 (representing $17,748.20 in fees and $2,094.99 in costs) as
a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel.
In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the
Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice
renouncing their right to seek review.
2