The judge, before whom this case was tried without a jury, appears to have found that there was in fact no fraud on the part of the defendant, and rightly refused to rule that there was a fraudulent taking as matter of law.
Exceptions overruled.
The judge, before whom this case was tried without a jury, appears to have found that there was in fact no fraud on the part of the defendant, and rightly refused to rule that there was a fraudulent taking as matter of law.
Exceptions overruled.