Thompson v. Thompson

ei-xtered i n t o between t h e p a r t i e s c ' J u n e in 1.5, 1972, w a s incorpora &XI into the decree of divorce, e i.ntrc?rpretatic>i.~ t h a t agreement i s the b a s i s al: crf AGREEMENT AN PROPERTY SISTTLEM "WHEREAS , ttre ties hereto are presently, w i f e and husband, R irreeoaciiabie ifferenees have ari,sc.n between em maicing impossible the c n n t i r i u - m c e ra C t:he marriage relation. ""AND WHEREAS, desired y the parties to it i s achLeve a i e g d separation and divorce, w i t h a pro erty settlement and other agr upon as ami.caIaTe a s i s as , i s pussi curnst:,ances, and w i t h as Z i t t i e p u b L i e i t : y a t t e n d a n t upon such proceedings as m i 8 t be x.ea,sonab of att.8ixlmera t ; " 1 , P l a i n t i . f f , i.m~rrcdFatel.ynfter the ate o f this agreement, w i i L c a u s e to be repared and filed in Cascade County, Montana, an a c t i o f o r d i v i i r e e a g a i n s t the above named Deferidant ** 9~ i t , being contempla te t h a , t said divorce will be obt.ai.ned upon the terms a n d condi,tianshereinafter set f o r t h ; l_iizferrdo.nt:, agrees t h a t he w : . i l nut in any w t i y contest or himper the o b t a i n i n g 06 sai.d di.vor:re, arknewledgl.ng that grounds therefore e x i s t , * .Jc *, 1, ant wi.11 i r i a t e l y cause to be prepaa.ed a good and s u f f i c i e n t q u i t claim deed, and wiLL execute the some in favor of the PLzrintiff, to t e pcem.i.sesd e s i r r i as fol.Ecwi;: "d) In addition to t.he r e a l . t y , P l , . a i a t i . f f shall have title to, and possession o f aJL furniture, equipment, .fi.xtriree, and furrrisktings i,n s a k i residence, "'f) [Stricken b y parties and initialed], new husband c o n t i ued to live in t h e residence, Defendant Marvin on A p r i l 9 , 1975, after requesting the plaintiff to be r e l i e v e d making the payments pursuant to t e p r o p e r t y s e t t l e m e n t agrc?exnent, payments, rid since plai.rkrrl.if f.ic?len had remarried, t eso payments after o r a l ar istrict court ardere "11, That: s a i d :ie a r a t i o n Agreement an3 Property Settlement prov,,i.de as f o i . 1 . o ~ ~ : 58 l i T , That the Defendant made payments ' t h e Plaintiff o of the a x i m x i r e q u i r e d f o r t h e ouse payment.; ; By t h e way o f achieving an adequate ii ? division o f property, toget er wl th o t h e r itinms so that: i s l . a i n t i . f f w i l l , d for 8 f t e e s a i d divorce, and p a r t i c u l a r r e g a r d to her p ysFeaL condition,' s i d e r a t i o n and vaoa'ii.rrg the aiiiended P i i ~ d i n g s , conolixsi.orrs and order, W kiave ' e exadrrec! t a agreement o f the p a r t i e s and as agreed to pay, husband to pay the alimony at the time o f his pstff::ion fur r e i i w t i o n i n the payment, dire to loss o f iacoiire anil %,11. I-,:al.th, wMcl.s earmot be severed t k r e l r o n i w i t h c r u t dest.royi.rx&;the c o n t r a c t , The trial euurt cannot, nor can this Court, rewrite the agreemecxs. for t h e parir.i.e.: h e r e i n , nor i n f e r or i n i ~ i i yfronr i t s Language c h a t w h i c h i s n o t intended, I s v a c a t e d and set a s i . d e