No. 80-213
I N THE SUPREME COURT O T E STATE O MONTANA
F H F
1981
THE STATE O MONTANA,
F
P l a i n t i f f and Respondent,
VS .
JAMES CLIFTON JENKINS,
Defendant and A p p e l l a n t .
Appeal from: D i s t r i c t C o u r t of t h e E i g h t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t ,
I n and f o r t h e County o f Cascade.
Honorable J o e l G . Roth, J u d g e p r e s i d i n g .
Counsel o f Record:
For A p p e l l a n t : Marcia B i r k e n b u e l , G r e a t F a l l s , Montana
For Respondent: J . Bourdeau, G r e a t F a l l s , Montana
and Mike G r e e l y , H e l e n a , Montana
S u b m i t t e d on b r i e f s : F e b r u a r y 1.8,
1981
Decided: J u n e 1 0 , 1981
Filed : 1 0 1981
Mr. J u s t i c e Fred J. Weber d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e C o u r t .
James C l i f t o n J e n k i n s was c h a r g e d i n August 1979 w i t h two
c o u n t s of r o b b e r y . H e was t r i e d by j u r y i n t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t
of t h e E i g h t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Cascade County, t h e Honorable
J o e l Roth p r e s i d i n g . J e n k i n s was found g u i l t y on b o t h c o u n t s
and s e n t e n c e d t o 20 y e a r s on e a c h , t h e s e n t e n c e s t o r u n consecu-
tively. He a p p e a l s from b o t h c o n v i c t i o n s .
Pam R a i n s , manager of t h e F e e d l o t R e s t a u r a n t i n G r e a t F a l l s ,
was a l o n e i n t h e r e s t a u r a n t and t a k i n g a b r e a k a t 4 : 0 0 p.m. on
August 1 8 , 1979. She n o t i c e d a man o u t s i d e who was l o o k i n g
t h r o u g h t h e f r o n t window of t h e r e s t a u r a n t . The man e n t e r e d t h e
r e s t a u r a n t and R a i n s went behind t h e c o u n t e r t o t a k e h i s o r d e r .
The man s a i d : "Do as I s a y " , and gave h e r a n o t e which r e a d :
"Take a l l t h e money from t h e r e g i s t e r and g i v e i t t o me." The
man p l a c e d a gun on t h e c o u n t e r . Two p e o p l e e n t e r e d t h e r e s t a u -
r a n t b e f o r e Rains gave t h e man any money. The man r e t r i e v e d h i s
n o t e and l e f t . Rains d e s c r i b e d him a s a l i g h t - c o m p l e c t e d w h i t e
male, 39 o r 4 0 y e a r s o l d , 6 ' t o 6 ' 2 " , 150 pounds, c l e a n shaven,
w i t h s h o r t r e c e d i n g h a i r of a sandy-grey c o l o r , wearing t a n
p a n t s and a n o p e n - c o l l a r e d s h i r t w i t h h o r i z o n t a l w h i t e and g r e e n
stripes.
A few m i n u t e s a f t e r t h e a t t e m p t e d r o b b e r y of t h e F e e d l o t ,
a man e n t e r e d t h e Mode OIDay s t o r e i n G r e a t F a l l s . The s t o r e
was n o t open f o r b u s i n e s s , b u t Mavis Bean, who owned t h e s t o r e ,
and Teresa Bean, M r s . R o b e r t Anderson and R o b e r t a King were
i n s i d e unpacking a c l o t h i n g shipment. The man, who was armed
w i t h a k n i f e and gun, approached T e r e s a Bean and a s k e d where
t h e till was l o c a t e d . Mavis Bean t o l d him t h e y were n o t open
f o r b u s i n e s s and t h e man l e f t t h e s t o r e . Mavis Bean d e s c r i b e d
t h e man a s Caucasion, 5 ' 1 0 " t o 6 ' l " , 37 t o 40 y e a r s o f a g e ,
w i t h l i g h t r e c e d i n g h a i r , and wearing o l d denim p a n t s and a
striped T-shirt. T e r e s a Bean d e s c r i b e d t h e man a s b e i n g 6 '
t a l l , s l e n d e r , c l e a n shaven, f a i r - c o m p l e c t e d , w i t h l i g h t brown
h a i r and a r e c e d i n g h a i r l i n e and wearing j e a n s and a w h i t e
s w e a t e r w i t h s h o r t s l e e v e s and aqua s t r i p e s .
G r e a t F a l l s p o l i c e d e t e c t i v e s Dave Warrington and Eugene
B e r n a r d i were i n v o l v e d i n t h e r o b b e r y i n v e s t i g a t i o n . On August
20 a t 11:30 a.m., t h e y e n t e r e d t h e Lobby Bar i n G r e a t F a l l s and
n o t i c e d James C l i f t o n J e n k i n s . Warrington approached J e n k i n s
and t o l d him he f i t t h e d e s c r i p t i o n of a r o b b e r y s u s p e c t .
J e n k i n s had no i d e n t i f i c a t i o n and gave h i s name a s L a r r y White.
J e n k i n s was p a t t e d down i n t h e w a i s t a r e a and asked i f he would
accompany t h e o f f i c e r s s o t h a t a w i t n e s s c o u l d s e e him. Jenkins
went w i t h t h e o f f i c e r s v o l u n t a r i l y . H e was n o t a r r e s t e d o r
handcuffed. He was p l a c e d i n t h e b a c k s e a t of a n unmarked p o l i c e
c a r , a y e l l o w two-door Ford Fairmont. The t h r e e men t h e n d r o v e
t o t h e Mode 0 ' Day s t o r e .
Mavis Bean w a s n o t a t t h e s t o r e . Warrington t e l e p h o n e d
Pam Rains a t h e r home and r e q u e s t e d t h a t t h e y meet a t a c e r t a i n
p a r k i n g l o t s o Rains c o u l d s e e J e n k i n s f o r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n pur-
poses. The d e t e c t i v e s and J e n k i n s d r o v e a c r o s s town t o m e e t
Rains. The p o l i c e v e h i c l e a r r i v e d a t t h e p a r k i n g l o t f i r s t .
When Rains a r r i v e d , Warrington g o t o u t of t h e c a r and went t o
R a i n s ' v e h i c l e , which was parked 60 f e e t away. Warrington t o l d
Rains he had two men s e a t e d i n h i s c a r and a s k e d h e r i f s h e
c o u l d i d e n t i f y e i t h e r man a s t h e r o b b e r . D e t e c t i v e ~ e r n a r d ii s
6 ' 1 " t a l l and weighs 200 pounds. H e was s i t t i n g i n t h e f r o n t
seat. J e n k i n s i s 5 ' 9 " t a l l and weighs 1 5 0 pounds and was i n
t h e b a c k s e a t of t h e two-door v e h i c l e . R a i n s approached t h e
police car. When s h e was a b o u t 25 f e e t away,she p o i n t e d a t
J e n k i n s and s a i d : " T h a t ' s him." Warrington asked Rains t o
walk c l o s e r t o t h e c a r . When s h e w a s 8-10 f e e t away, s h e
s t a t e d t h a t s h e was p o s i t i v e t h a t t h e man i n t h e b a c k s e a t was
the robber.
J e n k i n s was t h e n t o l d he was under a r r e s t f o r t h e a t t e m p t e d
r o b b e r y of t h e F e e d l o t . He was t r a n s p o r t e d t o t h e G r e a t F a l l s
P o l i c e Department and photographed t h e r e . While i n c u s t o d y ,
J e n k i n s gave a s i g n e d c o n s e n t t o s e a r c h h i s a p a r t m e n t . A short-
s l e e v e , o p e n - c o l l a r e d s h i r t , o f f - w h i t e w i t h aqua-green s t r i p e s ,
w a s found a t t h e a p a r t m e n t . A photographic a r r a y containing
J e n k i n s ' photograph was shown t o t h r e e o f t h e w i t n e s s e s t o t h e
r o b b e r y a t t h e Mode OIDay and t o t h e two c u s t o m e r s of t h e Feed-
lot. Mavis Bean, T e r e s a Bean and M r s . R o b e r t Anderson a l l
i d e n t i f i e d t h e photograph of J e n k i n s a s t h e man who t r i e d t o r o b
the store. The F e e d l o t c u s t o m e r s were u n a b l e t o make a p o s i t i v e
identification. Mavis Bean, T e r e s a Bean and Pam Rains a l s o i d e n -
t i f i e d t h e s h i r t s e i z e d a s t h e one worn by t h e man who a t t e m p t e d
t o r o b them. J e n k i n s was t h e n charged w i t h t h e a t t e m p t e d
r o b b e r y of t h e Mode OIDay.
J e n k i n s e n t e r e d p l e a s of " n o t g u i l t y " t o b o t h c o u n t s and
moved t o s u p p r e s s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t e s t i m o n y on t h e grounds t h a t
i t was t h e f r u i t of a n i l l e g a l a r r e s t and made p u r s u a n t t o a
s u g g e s t i v e one-man show up. The motion t o s u p p r e s s w a s d e n i e d .
J e n k i n s was t r i e d by j u r y on November 19-21, 1979. The j u r y
r e t u r n e d v e r d i c t s of g u i l t y on b o t h c o u n t s . J e n k i n s was sen-
t e n c e d t o 20 y e a r s imprisonment on e a c h c o u n t , t h e s e n t e n c e s
t o run consecutively. H e was a l s o d e s i g n a t e d a dangerous o f -
f e n d e r , s e c t i o n 46-18-404, MCA, and a p e r s i s t e n t f e l o n y o f f e n d e r ,
s e c t i o n 46-18-501, MCA, and found t o be i n e l i g i b l e f o r p a r o l e
o r p a r t i c i p a t i o n i-n t h e p r i s o n f u r l o u g h program.
J e n k i n s r a i s e s two i s s u e s on a p p e a l :
1. Was t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t e s t i m o n y d e r i v e d from t h e t r a n s -
p o r t a t i o n of J e n k i n s f o r t h e purpose of e x h i b i t i n g him t o a
w i t n e s s s u p p r e s s i b l e b e c a u s e h i s F o u r t h Amendment r i g h t t o b e
s e c u r e i n h i s p e r s o n a g a i n s t u n r e a s o n a b l e s e i z u r e s had been v i o -
lated?
2. Was t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n a t t h e p a r k i n g l o t , a n d t h e
subsequent i d e n t i f i c a t i o n a t t r i a l , suppressible because
Jenkins' F i f t h Amendment d u e p r o c e s s r i g h t s had b e e n v i o l a t e d ?
J e n k i n s a r g u e s t h a t a l t h o u g h h e was n o t f o r m a l l y a r r e s t e d
b e f o r e R a i n s i d e n t i f i e d him, t h e p o l i c e c o n d u c t was i n d i s -
t i n g u i s h a b l e from a r r e s t u n d e r t h e s t a n d a r d o f Dunaway v .
N e w York ( 1 9 7 9 ) , 442 U.S. 200, 99 S . C t . 2248, 60 L.Ed.2d 824.
T h i s c o n t e n t i o n i s b a s e d upon t h e a s s e r t i o n t h a t h i s j o u r n e y w i t h
t h e o f f i c e r s was i n v o l u n t a r y b e c a u s e , i n v i e w o f a l l t h e c i r -
c u m s t a n c e s s u r r o u n d i n g t h e i n c i d e n t , a r e a s o n a b l e p e r s o n would
h a v e b e l i e v e d t h a t h e was n o t f r e e t o l e a v e . United S t a t e s v.
Mendenhall ( 1 9 8 0 ) , 446 U.S. 544, 1 0 0 S . C t . 1 8 7 0 , 64 L.Ed.2d 497.
Jenkins f u r t h e r contends t h a t because t h e pol-ice lacked probable
c a u s e f o r t h e " a r r e s t " , t h e f r u i t s t h e r e o f should have been
s u p p r e s s e d by t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t .
Not e v e r y c o n f r o n t a t i o n i n i t i a t e d by a p o l i c e o f f i c e r m u s t
be based on probable cause. T e r r y v . Ohio ( 1 9 6 8 ) , 392 U.S. I-,
20 L.Ed.2d 889, 88 S . C t . 1868. To j u s t i f y i n t r u s i o n upon t h e
c o n s t i t u t i o n a l r i g h t s of a c i t i z e n , " t h e p o l i c e o f f i c e r must be
a b l e t o p o i n t t o s p e c i f i c and a r t i c u l a b l e f a c t s which, taken to-
g e t h e r w i t h r a t i o n a l i n f e r e n c e s from t h o s e f a c t s , r e a s o n a b l y
warrant t h a t intrusion." T e r r y , 392 U.S. a t 21. ~etectives
W a r r i n g t o n and B e r n a r d i w e r e a b l e t o p o i n t t o s p e c i f i c and
a r t i c u l a b l e f a c t s which r e a s o n a b l y w a r r a n t e d t h e i n t r u s i o n t h a t
J e n k i n s now q u e s t i o n s . They were a s s i g n e d t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e
r o b b e r i e s o f t h e F e e d l o t and t h e Mode O'Day. They w e r e f a m i l i a r
with t h e d e s c r i p t i o n s of t h e robber. While i n t h e Lobby B a r ,
j u s t two d a y s a f t e r t h e r o b b e r i e s , t h e y o b s e r v e d a man who f i t
t h e d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e s u s p e c t . They a p p r o a c h e d t h e man. War-
r i n g t o n t o l d him t h a t t h e r e had b e e n two a t t e m p t e d r o b b e r i e s
two d a y s b e f o r e and t h a t i t was W a r r i n g t o n ' s o p i n i o n t h a t t h e
man resembled t h e p e r s o n who had committed t h e c r i m e s . When
Warrington asked t h e man h i s name, he responded t h a t i t was
L a r r y White. The man had no i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . Warrington p a t t e d
t h e man i n t h e w a i s t a r e a t o d e t e r m i n e i f he had any weapons.
Under t h e f a c t s o u t l i n e d above, t h e p o l i c e c o n d u c t was
r e a s o n a b l e and n o t v i o l a t i v e of J e n k i n s ' F o u r t h Amendment r i g h t s .
The p o l i c e must be a l l o w e d t o approach and q u e s t i o n p e r s o n s
who f a i r l y resemble d e s c r i p t i o n s of p e r p e t r a t o r s of c r i m i n a l
acts. While t h e p a t down of J e n k i n s was i n t r u s i v e , i t was j u s t -
i f i e d b e c a u s e i t was l i m i t e d t o a s e a r c h f o r weapons, J e n k i n s
f i t t h e d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e r o b b e r , and t h e r o b b e r had been
armed w i t h a k n i f e and a gun. Police o f f i c e r s a r e not required
t o t a k e u n n e c e s s a r y r i s k s i n t h e performance of t h e i r d u t i e s .
" [ T l h e r e must be a n a r r o w l y drawn a u t h o r i t y t o p e r m i t a r e a -
s o n a b l e s e a r c h f o r weapons f o r t h e p r o t e c t i o n of t h e p o l - i c e
o f f i c e r , where he h a s r e a s o n t o b e l i e v e t h a t he i s d e a l i n g
w i t h a n armed and d a n g e r o u s i n d i v i d u a l , r e g a r d l e s s of whether
he h a s p r o b a b l e c a u s e t o a r r e s t . " T e r r y , s u p r a , 3 9 2 U.S. at
27. The i n i t i a l e n c o u n t e r between J e n k i n s and t h e d e t e c t i v e s was
lawful.
Whether J e n k i n s ' c o n s e n t t o accompany t h e d e t e c t i v e s
was v o l u n t a r y i s t o be d e t e r m i n e d by t h e t o t a l i t y of t h e c i r -
cumstances. Mendenhall, s u p r a , 4 4 6 U.S. a t 557. The ~ i s t r i c t
Judge had t h e o p p o r t u n i t y t o o b s e r v e W a r r i n g t o n , B e r n a r d i and
J e n k i n s a t t h e s u p p r e s s i o n h e a r i n g and e v a l u a t e t h e i r t e s t i m o n y .
Warrington t e s t i f i e d t h a t a f t e r t h e p a t down, he a s k e d J e n k i n s
i f he would "mind g o i n g " w i t h t h e o f f i c e r s . Warrington f u r t h e r
t e s t i f i e d t h a t J e n k i n s r e p l i e d t h a t h e d i d n o t mind b e c a u s e t h e y
had t h e wrong man. The r e s t of t h e d e t e c t i v e s ' t e s t i m o n y i n -
d i c a t e d t h a t J e n k i n s was n o t h a n d c u f f e d , f u r t h e r s e a r c h e d , o r
o t h e r w i s e c o e r c e d u n t i l a f t e r Rains made h e r i d e n t i f i c a t i o n .
When J e n k i n s asked t h e d e t e c t i v e s i f he was under a r r e s t , t h e y
r e p l i e d t h a t he was n o t . J e n k i n s a r g u e s t h a t h i s placement i n
t h e b a c k s e a t of a two-door p o l i c e v e h i c l e was a r e s t r i c t i o n
amounting t o a s e i z u r e . However, t h e p o i n t i s whether h i s
p r e s e n c e t h e r e was v o l u n t a r y . The f a c t t h a t he was t h e r e i s
l i t t l e o r no e v i d e n c e t h a t h e was i n any way c o e r c e d . Menden-
h a l l , s u p r a , 446 U.S. a t 559. W e f i n d t h a t the record supports
t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t ' s c o n c l u s i o n t h a t J e n k i n s a g r e e d t o accompany
t h e o f f i c e r s and had n o t been " a r r e s t e d " p r i o r t o h i s f o r m a l
a r r e s t upon i d e n t i f i c a t i o n by R a i n s . J e n k i n s was n o t i l l e g a l l y
s e i z e d , and t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t e s t i m o n y was n o t s u p p r e s s i b l e
because o b t a i n e d i n v i o l a t i o n of h i s F o u r t h Amendment r i g h t s .
Jenkins' second i s s u e c o n c e r n s t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n by Rains
i n t h e p a r k i n g l o t and t h e s u b s e q u e n t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of him a t
trial. He c o n t e n d s t h a t he was d e n i e d due p r o c e s s b e c a u s e t h e
show up was u n n e c e s s a r i l y s u g g e s t i v e and conducive t o irre-
parable misidentification. S t o v a l l v . Denno ( 1 9 6 7 ) , 388 U.S.
293, 302, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, 1206, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 1972. The
t e s t we m u s t u s e i n r e s o l v i n g t h i s i s s u e i s two-pronged. First,
w a s t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n p r o c e d u r e i m p e r m i s s i b l y s u g g e s t i v e ; and,
i f s o , d i d i t have s u c h a tendency t o g i v e r i s e t o a s u b s t a n t i a l
l i k e l i h o o d of i r r e p a r a b l e m i s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n t h a t t o a l l o w t h e
w i t n e s s t o make a n i n - c o u r t i d e n t i f i c a t i o n would v i o l a t e due
process. N e i l v. B i g g e r s ( 1 9 7 2 ) , 409 U.S. 188, 198, 34 L.Ed.2d
401, 410-1.1, 93 S.Ct. 375, 381. The p r o c e d u r e used t o i d e n t i f y
J e n k i n s was undoubtedly s u g g e s t i v e , and one-on-one confronta-
t i o n s have been w i d e l y and p r o p e r l y condemned by t h e United
S t a t e s Supreme C o u r t . However, under t h e second prong of t h e
t e s t we employ, we must c o n s i d e r whether t h e t o t a l i t y of t h e
c i r c u m s t a n c e s g i v e s r i s e t o a s u b s t a n t i a l l i k e l i h o o d of m i s -
identification. W must weigh t h e c o r r u p t i v e e f f e c t of t h e
e
s u g g e s t i v e p r o c e d u r e a g a i n s t f a c t o r s t o be c o n s i d e r e d i n
e v a l u a t i n g t h e l i k e l i h o o d of m i s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . Manson v .
~ r a t h w a i t e ( 1 9 7 7 ) , 432 U.S. 9 8 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140, 9 7 S.Ct. 2243.
The f a c t o r s a r e : (1) t h e o p p o r t u n i t y of t h e w i t n e s s t o view
t h e c r i m i n a l a t t h e t i m e of t h e c r i m e , ( 2 ) t h e witness' degree
of a t t e n t i o n , ( 3 ) t h e a c c u r a c y of t h e w i t n e s s ' p r i o r d e s c r i p t i o n ,
( 4 ) t h e l e v e l of c e r t a i n t y d e m o n s t r a t e d by t h e w i t n e s s a t t h e
c o n f r o n t a t i o n , and ( 5 ) t h e l e n g t h of t i m e between t h e c r i m e and
the confrontation. N e i l v. B i g g e r s , s u p r a , 409 U.S. a t 199.
Rains had a c l e a r view of J e n k i n s b e f o r e he e n t e r e d t h e r e s t a u -
rant. She viewed him f a c e - t o - f a c e a c r o s s t h e c o u n t e r , i n good
l i g h t , during t h e robbery attempt. He was t h e o n l y o t h e r p e r -
son i n t h e r e s t a u r a n t , s o h e r l e v e l of a t t e n t i o n was h i g h . With
t h e e x c e p t i o n of h e i g h t , h e r d e s c r i p t i o n was a c c u r a t e . The
r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t s h e was q u i t e c e r t a i n t h a t J e n k i n s was t h e
man who t r i e d t o r o b h e r , and o n l y two d a y s had p a s s e d between
t h e c r i m e and t h e c o n f r o n t a t i o n . W e cannot conclude t h a t t h e
i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of J e n k i n s by Rains was s o u n r e l i a b l e a s t o
c o n s t i t u t e a v i o l a t i o n of due p r o c e s s . Considering t h e t o t a l i t y
of t h e c i r c u m s t a n c e s , we h o l d t h a t w h i l e t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n
p r o c e d u r e was s u g g e s t i v e , i t d i d n o t c r e a t e a s i t u a t i o n i n
which t h e r e was a s u b s t a n t i a l l i k e l i h o o d of m i s i d e n t i f i c a t i o n .
W affirm.
e
W e concur:
4;&4, Wu s t i c e
&,\
Chief J