UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6935
ROBERT LEE HOOD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THEODIS BECK; WINIFRED H. DILLON; JAMES L.
GRIFFIN; MICHAEL S. HAMDEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-04-312-5-BO)
Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 3, 2004
Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lee Hood, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Hood appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as
frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Hood v. Beck, No. CA-04-
312-5-BO (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -