United States v. Rayne Wolery

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 15 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30081 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 6:09-cr-00015-CCL v. MEMORANDUM * RAYNE WOLERY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 8, 2011 ** Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Rayne Wolery appeals from the 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted sexual exploitation of children, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Wolery contends that the district court erred by failing to recognize its * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). authority to depart downward from the 15-year mandatory minimum sentence called for by the statute. This contention lacks merit. In the absence of a motion from the government, the district court did not have discretion to depart downward from the mandatory minimum. See United States v. Valente, 961 F.2d 133, 134-35 (9th Cir. 1992); see also United States v. Quach, 302 F.3d 1096, 1103 n.3 (9th Cir. 2002). Wolery also contends that the mandatory minimum sentence violates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. This contention also lacks merit. See United States v. Meiners, 485 F.3d 1211, 1212-13 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). AFFIRMED. 2 10-30081