Rambus Inc. v. International Trade Commission

1 NOTE: This order is n0nprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit RAMBUS INC., Appellant, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND NVIDIA CORPORATION, Interven,or. ‘ 2010-1483 011 appeal from the United States Internati0na1Trade C0mmiSSi0n in InVestigati0n N0. 337-TA-661. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, INC., BFG TECHNOLOGIES, INC., BIOSTAR MICROTECH (U.S.A.) CORP., BIOSTAR MICROTECH INTERNATIONAL CORP., DIABLOTEK INC., EVGA CORP., G.B.T. INC., GIGA- BYTE TECHNOLOGY C0., LTD., HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY, MSI COMPUTER CORP., MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, LTD., GRACOM TECHNOLOGIES LLC (F0RMERLY KNOwN RAMBUs v. 1Tc 2 As PALIT MUL'1‘IMEDIA INc.), PALIT MICROSYSTEMS LTD., PINE TECHNOLOGY (MACAO COMMERCIAL OFFSHORE) LTD., AND SPARKLE COMPUTER COMPANY, LTD., Appellcmts, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND RAMBUS, INC., Intervenor, AND NVIDIA CORPORATION, In,terven,or. 2010-1556 On appeal from the United States Ir1ternati011alTrade C0mmissi0n in Investigati0n N0. 337-TA-661. NVIDIA CORPORATION, Appellcmt, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND RAMBUS, INC., In,terven,0r. _ 3 RAMBUS V. ITC 2010-1557 On appeal from the United States Internationa1 Trade C0mn:1ission in Investigation N0. 337-TA-661. ON MOTION ORDER . NVIDIA C0rporation, Asustek Computer Inc., et al., and Rambus Inc. move for a 21~day extension of time, until June 16, 2011, to file their reply briefs in the respec- tive appeals. ° Upon consideration thereof IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted No further extensions FoR THE CoURT 1 lsi J an Horba1y Date Jan Horbaly C1erk Fll.ED _ _ U»S. COI.lRT 0F AP EALS FOR ccc S1dney A. Rosenzwe1g, Esq. THE FEDERAL ('ilRf;u\T I. Nee1 Chatterjee, Esq. _ o J. Michael Jakes, Esq. MAY'1 9 2011 Ruffin B. Cordell, Esq. MNmRBN- S21 cum y