Rambus Inc. v. International Trade Commission

NOTE: This order is 110nprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit RAMBUS INC., Appellant, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, - AND NVIDIA CORPORATION, Interven0r. ‘ 2010-1483 011 appeal from the United States Internati0na1 Trade C0mmissi0n in Investigati0n N0. 337-TA-661. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, INC., BFG TECHNOLOGIES, INC., BIOSTAR MICROTECH (U.S.A.) CORP., BIOSTAR MICROTECH INTERNATIONAL CORP., DlABLOTEK INC., EVGA CORP., G.B.T. INC., GIGA- BYTE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY, MSI COMPUTER CORP., MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, LTD., GRACOM TECHNOLOGIES LLC (F0RMERLY KN0WN RAMBUS V. ITC 2 AS PALIT MULTIMEDIA INC.), PALIT MICROSYSTEMS LTD., PINE TECHNOLOGY (MACAO COMMERCIAL OFFSHORE) LTD., AND SPARKLE COMPUTER COMPANY, LTD., Appell0:nts, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appel.lee, AND RAMBUS, INC., Intervenor, AND NVIDIA CORPORATION, In,terven,0r. 2010-1556 On appeal from the United States Internati0na1Trade C0mmissi0n in Investigati0n N0. 337-TA-661 NV'IDIA CORPORATION, Appellan,t, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND RAMBUS, INC., Interven0r. _ 3 RAMBUs v. ITC 2010-1557 On appeal from the United StateS lnternational Trade C0n1missi0n in Investigati0n N0. 337-TA-661. ON MOTION ORDER _ NVIDIA Corporation, Asustek Computer Inc., et al., and Rarnbus Inc. move for a 21~day extension of time, until June 16, 2011, to file their reply briefs in the respec- tive appea1s. ° Upon consideration there0f, IT ls ORDERE:o THAT: The motion is granted No further extensions FOR THE COURT 1 9 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an H0rbaly C1 k _ _ er U.S. COURl":{‘Jll?Eil’)FEALS FOR cci S1dney A. Rosenzwe1g, Esq. THE FEDERAL ClRcurf I. Neel Chatterjee, Esq. _ J. Michael Jakes, Esq. HAY' 1 9 2011 Ruffin B. C0rdell, Esq. lamm s21 cam