United States v. Douglas Gibson

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 27 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10118 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-50171-JAT v. MEMORANDUM* DOUGLAS LANE GIBSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding** Submitted May 13, 2014*** Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Douglas Lane Gibson appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the eight-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gibson’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gibson the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 13-10118