REVERSE the orders granting the motions to dismiss AND
REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings
consistent with this order.
PickerH:
, J.
Saitta
PARRAGUIRRE, J., concurring:
For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v.
U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree
that respondent Wells Fargo lost its lien priority by virtue of the
homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize,
however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly,
P
concur in the disposition of this appeal.
et--00teL,Scsrs. , J.
Parraguirre
cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge
Howard Kim & Associates
Buckley Madole, P.C.
Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
OM 1947A e