IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF No. 69076
ALDA A. ANDERSON, BAR NO. 8746.
FILED
JAN 2 2 2016
1E K. LINDEMAN
CLpp5MESQJR
CHIEF DEP7 CLERK
ORDER APPROVING CONDITIONAL GUILTY PLEA
This is an automatic review of a Southern Nevada
Disciplinary Board hearing panel's recommendation that this court
approve, pursuant to SCR 113, a conditional guilty plea agreement in
exchange for a stated form of discipline for attorney Alda Anderson.
Under the agreement, Anderson admitted to violations of RPC 1.15
(safekeeping property) and RPC 5.3 (responsibilities regarding nonlawyer
assistants), and the State Bar agreed to dismiss charges that Anderson
violated RPC 1.3 (diligence), RPC 8.1(a) (bar admission and disciplinary
matters), and RPC 8.4 (misconduct).
Anderson was admitted to the practice of law in Nevada in
2004 and has no prior disciplinary record. The violations at issue here
involve Anderson's use of funds from her trust account to pay business
expenses and her failure to supervise a nonlawyer employee hired to
handle loan modifications. Due to Anderson's failure to supervise the
employee and provide for sufficient checks and balances to monitor
incoming client funds, the employee was able to misappropriate funds
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A e - 01325
from Anderson's business account and retain cash payments made by
clients for bankruptcy and loan modification services. During the relevant
time period, Anderson frequently gambled. She acknowledged in the plea
agreement that her gambling "in some manner contributed to her lack of
supervision and failure to properly handle her office expenses."
As part of the plea agreement, Anderson agreed to an 18-
month stayed suspension and to pay the costs of the disciplinary
proceedings, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries. The stayed
suspension is subject to the following conditions: Anderson must (1)
promptly comply with all requests for information from the State Bar,
including but not limited to, copies of bank statements and case lists; (2)
not engage in any activity that results in public discipline, including a
letter of reprimand; (3) participate in the NLAP program, including but
not limited to, an initial consultation with the designated NLAP physician
and compliance with any recommendations made by a licensed physician
as a result of that consultation; (4) obtain a mentor approved by the State
Bar for purposes of accounting and law practice management; (5) meet
with her mentor twice a month to discuss accounting practices,
supervision of employees, goals, and any other issues pertaining to her
legal practice; (6) provide quarterly reports to the State Bar regarding her
trust account, including but not limited to, copies of her trust account
statements; and (7) not be convicted of any crime with the exception of
minor traffic infractions that do not involve alcohol or controlled
substances.
Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the guilty
plea agreement should be approved. See SCR 113(1). Considering the
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A .0
duties violated, Anderson's mental state, the lack of any actual injury to a
client, the aggravating circumstance (substantial experience in the
practice of law), and the mitigating circumstances (absence of prior
disciplinary record and personal or emotional problems), we agree that an
18-month stayed suspension is sufficient to serve the purpose of attorney
discipline See In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246, 197 P.3d
1067, 1077 (2008) (identifying four factors that must be weighed in
determining the appropriate discipline: "the duty violated, the lawyer's
mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer's
misconduct, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors"); ABA
Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions, Compendium of Prof?
Responsibility Rules and Standards, Standard 4.12 (2015) (providing that
absent aggravating or mitigating circumstances, "[s]uspension is generally
appropriate when a lawyer knows or should know that he is dealing
improperly with client property and causes injury or potential injury to a
client"); id. Standard 7.2 (providing that absent aggravating or mitigating
circumstances, "[s]uspension is generally appropriate when a lawyer
knowingly engages in conduct that is a violation of a duty owed as a
professional and causes injury or potential injury to a client, the public, or
the legal system"); see also State Bar of Nev. v. Claiborne, 104 Nev. 115,
213, 756 P.2d 464, 527-28 (1988) (observing that the purpose of attorney
discipline is to protect the public, the courts, and the legal profession, not
to punish the attorney).
We hereby impose an 18-month stayed suspension. Anderson
must comply with all of the conditions in the plea agreement, as outlined
above. Additionally, Anderson shall pay the costs of the disciplinary
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A eco
proceedings, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries, within 90 days of
receipt of the State Bar's bill of costs. See SCR 120. The State Bar shall
comply with SCR 121.1.
It is so ORDERED.
Parraguirre
J.
Saitta
0, 1
0162A-A-__ J.
i
Gibbons Pickering
cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board
Law Office of Alda A. Anderson, P.C.
C. Stanley Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada
Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada
Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, U.S. Supreme Court
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
4
(IF 1947A ce