Texas Municipal League Joint Self-Insurance Fund, and Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool v. Housing Authority of City of Alice

ACCEPTED 04-15-00069-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/16/2015 9:12:23 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK NO. 04–15-00069-CV FILED IN In the Fourth Court of Appeals,4thSANCOURT OF APPEALS ANTONIO, TEXAS San Antonio, Texas 04/16/2015 9:12:23 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk Texas Municipal League Joint Self-Insurance Fund a/k/a The Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool Appellant vs. Housing Authority of the City of Alice, Texas Appellee Appeal from the 79th Judicial District Court Jim Wells County, Texas, No. 14-10-53721-CV The Honorable David Sanchez, Presiding Judge APPENDIX TO APPELLANT’S BRIEF Barry Abrams State Bar No. 00822700 Jack W. Higdon State Bar No. 24007360 BLANK ROME LLP 700 Louisiana, Suite 4000 Houston, TX 77002-2727 (713) 228-6601 (713) 228-6605 (Fax) ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE JOINT SELF-INSURANCE FUND A/K/A THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK POOL ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Tab A Interlocal Agreement (CR 71-76) Tab B Property Coverage Document (CR 78-125) Tab C Order Selecting Umpire (CR 284) Tab D The Local Government Contract Claims Act (the “Act”) (TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE §§271.151, et seq.) excerpts – Act §271.152 – Act §271.153 – Act §271.154 Tab E TEX. GOV’T CODE excerpts – Act §791.001 – Act §791.011(a) – Act §311.034 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Barry Abrams Barry Abrams State Bar No. 00822700 Babrams@BlankRome.com Jack W. Higdon State Bar No. 24007360 Jhigdon@BlankRome.com BLANK ROME LLP 700 Louisiana, Suite 4000 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 228-6601 (713) 228-6605 (Fax) ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE JOINT SELF-INSURANCE FUND A/K/A THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK POOL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was forwarded to the following counsel of record by email and United States First Class Mail, certified, return receipt requested, on April 16, 2015: Via Email & Certified Mail, RRR No. 70071490000022311663 Mr. Anthony Constant CONSTANT LAW FIRM One Shoreline Plaza 800 N. Shoreline Blvd, Suite 2700 South Corpus Christi, Texas 78401 Fax: 361-887-8010 /s/ Barry Abrams Barry Abrams TAB “A” 71 72 73 74 75 76 TAB “B” 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 TAB “C” 284 TAB “D” TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE §271.152. Waiver of Immunity to Suit for Certain Claims A local governmental entity that is authorized by statue or the constitution to enter into a contract and that enters into a contract subject to this subchapter waives sovereign immunity to suit for the purpose of adjudicating a claim for breach of the contract, subject to the terms and conditions of this subchapter. TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE §271.153. Limitations on Adjudication Awards (a) Except as provided by Subsection (c), the total amount of money awarded in an adjudication brought against a local governmental entity for breach of a contract subject to this subchapter is limited to the following: (1) the balance due and owed by the local governmental entity under the contract as it may have been amended, including any amount owed as compensation for the increased cost to perform the work as a direct result of owner-caused delays or acceleration; (2) the amount owed for change orders or additional work the contractor is directed to perform by a local governmental entity in connection with the contract; (3) reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees that are equitable and just; and (4) interest as allowed by law, including interest as calculated under Chapter 2251, Government Code. (b) Damages awarded in an adjudication brought against a local governmental entity arising under a contract subject to this subchapter may not include: (1) consequential damages, except as expressly allowed under Subsection (a)(1); (2) exemplary damages; or (3) damages for unabsorbed home office overhead. (c) Actual damages, specific performance, or injunctive relief may be granted in an adjudication brought against a local governmental entity for breach of a contract described by Section 271.151(2)(B) [which deals with contract for sale/delivery of reclaimed water]. TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE §271.154. Contractual Adjudication Procedures Enforceable Adjudication procedures, including requirements for serving notices or engaging in alternative dispute resolution proceedings before bringing a suit or an arbitration proceeding, that are stated in the contract subject to this subchapter or that are established by the local governmental entity and expressly incorporated into the contract or incorporated by reference are enforceable except to the extent those procedures conflict with the terms of this subchapter. TAB “E” TEX. GOV’T CODE §791.001. Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to increase the efficienty and effectiveness of local governments by authorizing them to contract, to the greatest possible extent, with one another and with agencies of the state. TEX. GOV’T CODE §791.011(a). Contracting Authority; Terms (a) A local government may contract or agree with another local government or a federally recognized Indian tribe, as listed by the United States secretary of the interior under 25 U.S.C. Section 479a-1, whose reservation is located within the boundaries of this state to perform governmental functions and services in accordance with this chapter... TEX. GOV’T CODE §311.034. Waiver of Sovereign Immunity In order to preserve the legislature’s interest in managing state fiscal matters through the appropriations process, a statute shall not be construed as a waiver of sovereign immunity unless the waiver is effected by clear and unambiguous language. In a statue, the use of “person,” as defined by Section 311.005 to include governmental entities, does not indicate legislative intent to waive sovereign immunity unless the context of the statute indicates no other reasonable construction. Statutory prerequisites to a suit, including the provision of notice, are jurisdictional requirements in all suits against a governmental entity.