Eric Drake v. Seana Willing

ACCEPTED 03-14-00665-CV 4681580 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:05:16 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK Case No. 03-14-00665-CV ______________________________ FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE AUSTIN, TEXAS THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT 3/27/2015 5:05:16 PM AUSTIN, TEXAS JEFFREY D. KYLE ______________________________ Clerk ERIC DRAKE Plaintiff - Appellant, vs. KASTL LAW FIRM P.C., ET. AL. Defendants - Appellees. ______________________________ On Appeal from the 200th District Court, Travis County Case No. D-1-GN-14-001215 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: COMES NOW SEANA WILLING, Appellee herein, and files this Motion to Strike Appellant’s Brief, and would respectfully show this Court the following: The maximum length of a brief in an appellate court is 15,000 words if computer-generated, and 50 pages if not. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B). On or about February 12, 2015, Eric Drake (“Appellant”) asked this Court for permission to exceed the word count in his original brief. In his motion, Appellant admits that his brief exceeds the word limit for a brief. On or about February 20, 2015, this Court denied Appellant’s motion. On March 2, 2014, Appellant filed his Appellant’s Brief. In that brief, he certified that his brief was in compliance of the word limit, as per TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(3). Appellant certified that “exclusive of the exempted portions, the brief contains 14,980 words. [Appellant’s Brief, page 85]. The exempted portions for purposes of a brief’s length are specified as follows: “In calculating the length of a document, every word and every part of the document, including headings, footnotes, and quotations, must be counted except the following: caption, identity of parties and counsel, statement regarding oral argument, table of contents, index of authorities, statement of the case, statement of issues presented, statement of jurisdiction, statement of procedural history, signature, proof of service, certification, certificate of compliance, and appendix.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(1). Appellant’s Brief exceeds the maximum length. Ms. Willing asks this Court to take judicial notice of the fact that exclusive of the exempted portions, the brief is over 75 pages in length. More significantly, despite Appellant certifying that his brief contained 14,980 words, and thus just making the word limit, the brief actually contains approximately 16,675 words, significantly exceeding the limit established by TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B). Ms. Willing asks this Court to take judicial notice that the relevant portions of Appellant’s Brief (pages 6-83) exceed the maximum length in both pages and words. For the convenience of the Court, a spreadsheet is attached identifying how many words are on each page. (Exhibit A). The word count for each page was counted using “Word Counter,” an Add-on Tool for Adobe Acrobat. Appellant’s false word count, presented knowingly to this Court despite (or because of) his awareness of this Court’s previous ruling, is yet another example of the bad faith in litigating this matter by Appellant, not only in this Court, but in the Trial Court. Other examples of the bad faith in his litigation include (but are not limited to): 1. Threatening spouses of state officials with litigation solely to avoid immunity afforded to state officials [See Vol. 4 Reporter’s Record, pages 11-12]; 2. Filing and asking the trial court to entertain Plaintiff’s Verified Motion to Reinstate and For New Trial on the same day as filing his Appellant’s Brief, knowing that this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter; 3. Attempting to forum shop by asking that this appeal be transferred to the Twelfth Court of Appeals; 4. Attempting to recuse judges on this Court based solely on speculation; 5. Attempting to recuse judges in Travis County on the day Appellant filed a Nonsuit, so that the Trial Court’s plenary jurisdiction would expire before the Motion to Declare Eric Drake a Vexatious Litigant could be heard [See Clerk’s Record, pages 547-555]; and 6. Attempting to insert documents into the record that were never filed or served on Ms. Willing. Appellant’s misrepresentation of the length of his brief should be considered more egregious when considered in the context of Appellant’s actions in this Court and in the Trial Court, and when the purpose of Appellant’s appeal is to avoid being declared (again) a vexatious litigant. In light of his knowing misrepresentation, Ms. Willing asks that Appellant’s Brief be stricken from the record, and that the determination of the Trial Court, finding Eric Drake to be a vexatious litigant, be affirmed. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k) (court may strike a document prepared in a manner to avoid the limits of Rule 9.4). Respectfully submitted, KEN PAXTON Attorney General of Texas CHARLES E. ROY First Assistant Attorney General JAMES E. DAVIS Deputy Attorney General for Defense Litigation ANGELA V. COLMENERO Chief–General Litigation Division /s/ Scot M. Graydon Scot M. Graydon Assistant Attorney General State Bar No. 24002175 Office of the Attorney General P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 463-2120 (512) 320-0667 - facsimile ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE SEANA WILLING CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE On March 10, 2015, the undersigned attempted to confer in writing with Mr. Eric Drake, Plaintiff Pro Se, regarding the underlying Motion. (Exhibit B, pages 1- 4). The undersigned has previously indicated to Mr. Drake that communications should be done in writing to avoid any miscommunication or misinterpretation regarding what parties did and did not agree to in oral attempts to confer. (Exhibit B, pages 7-8). Although the letter was sent to Appellant on March 10, 2015, and arrived at his address on March 11, 2015, Appellant has not picked up this letter as of the filing of this Motion. (Exhibit B, page 5). It is assumed Appellant is opposed to this Motion. While other parties were involved at the Trial Court level, none are involved in the appeal. /s/ Scot M. Graydon Scot M. Graydon Assistant Attorney General CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was sent via regular mail and certified mail, return receipt requested on March 27, 2015 to: Eric Drake PO Box 833688 Richardson, Texas 75083 Pro Se Appellant /s/ Scot M. Graydon Scot M. Graydon Assistant Attorney General WORD COUNT BY PAGE Page Number Word Count 6 188 7 180 8 181 9 201 10 226 11 207 12 215 13 29 14 203 15 188 16 245 17 243 18 215 19 226 20 226 21 205 22 208 23 227 24 239 25 245 Words for Pgs 6-25: 4097 26 258 27 206 28 225 29 218 30 211 31 224 32 217 33 84 34 271 35 228 36 223 37 247 38 230 EXHIBIT A WORD COUNT BY PAGE 39 239 40 218 41 241 42 213 43 234 44 240 45 226 Words for Pgs. 26-45 4453 46 239 47 229 48 192 49 232 50 238 51 194 52 223 53 250 54 215 55 228 56 230 57 245 58 245 59 239 60 226 61 236 62 207 63 125 64 228 65 236 Words for Pgs. 46-65 4457 66 234 67 224 68 194 69 233 70 249 71 224 WORD COUNT BY PAGE 72 44 73 214 74 218 75 245 76 232 77 224 78 222 79 236 80 230 81 250 82 195 Words for Pgs. 66-82 3668 Total Words: 6-25 4097 26-45 4453 46-65 4457 66-82 3668 Total: 16,675 EXHIBIT B Page 001 Page 002 Page 003 Page 004 USPS.com® - USPS Tracking™ https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tRef=fullpage&tL... English Customer Service USPS Mobile Register / Sign In Customer Service › Have questions? We're here to Tracking Number: EI063313274US Updated Delivery Day: Thursday, March 12, 2015 Scheduled Delivery Day: Wednesday, March 11, 2015, 12:00 pm Money Back Guarantee Product & Tracking Information Available Actions Postal Product: Extra Svc: Priority Mail Express 1-Day™ PO to Addressee Up to $100 insurance included Proof of Delivery Restrictions Apply Text Updates DATE & TIME STATUS OF ITEM LOCATION March 11, 2015 , 11:39 am Available for Pickup RICHARDSON, TX 75080 Email Updates Your item arrived at the RICHARDSON, TX 75080 post office at 11:39 am on March 11, 2015 and is ready for pickup. March 11, 2015 , 11:35 am Arrived at Post Office RICHARDSON, TX 75080 Arrived at USPS Origin March 11, 2015 , 6:45 am COPPELL, TX 75099 Facility March 10, 2015 , 9:22 pm Departed USPS Facility AUSTIN, TX 78710 March 10, 2015 , 6:58 pm Arrived at USPS Facility AUSTIN, TX 78710 March 10, 2015 , 5:42 pm Departed Post Office AUSTIN, TX 78701 March 10, 2015 , 3:41 pm Acceptance AUSTIN, TX 78701 Track Another Package Tracking (or receipt) number Page 005 1 of 2 3/27/2015 2:48 PM USPS.com® - USPS Tracking™ https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmAction.action?tRef=fullpage&tL... Page 006 2 of 2 3/27/2015 2:48 PM Page 007 Page 008