Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

The Attorney General of Texas Dacember 20,,1985 JIM MAlTOX Attorney General Overrules C-739 Supreme Court Building HonorableMorris Samford.Jr. OpinionNo. JM-398 P. 0. BOX 12549 Austin, TX. 78711.2549 Panola County Attarney 512’475-2501 Room 225. Courthouse Re: Reimbursementof county jail Telex 9101874.1387 Carthage;Texas 75633 inmates for money lost to escaping Telecooier 512/47502SS prisoner 714 Jackson, SUM 7W Dear Mr. Samford: Dallas, TX. 752024508 21417428944 You inquire who is legally_responsible for reimbursement to _ county jail inmates for money taken from the jail by an escaping prisoner. We conclude that the county is legally responsible for 4924 Alberta A”%. Suite 160 El Paso, TX. 799052793 money retainedby a county jail for safekeeping. 915/53334a4 The legislaturehas provided that the sheriff is responsiblefor the operation of the jail and for the safekeeping of prisoners 1Wl Texas, Suite 700 confinedin the jail. Article 5116, V.T.C.S.,provides,in part, that Houston, TX. 77002.3111 713/222-5999 (a) Rsch sheriff is the keeper of the jail of Fis cou~lty. Be shall safely keep therein all W6 Broadway, Suite 312 prisoners committed thereto by lavful authority, Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479 subject to the order of the proper court, and 9061747-5239 shall be responsiblefor the safe keeping of such prisoners. UOB N. Tenth, Suite B McAllen, TX. 7SWl~lSB5 (b) fhe sheriff may appoint a jailer to take 5121882.4547 charge of the jail, and supply the wants of those therein confined; but in all cases the sheriff 200 Main Plaza. Suite 400 shell exercise a supervisionand control over the San Antonio, TX. 782052797 jail. 51212254191 Article 16.21 of tx Code of CriminalProcedurestates,in part, that An Equal Opportunity/ Afflrmatlve Action Employer Every sheriff shall keep safely a person cosnuitte~i to his custody. See also AttorneyGeneral OpinionH-1190 (1978). The legislaturealso has provided that the "CommissionersCourt shell provide safe ,andsuitablejails for their respectivecounties," and that the jails,shall comply with the rules and proceduresof the Commissionon Jail Standards. -See V.T.C.S. art. 5115, as amended in p. 1821 HonorableMorris Samford,Jr. - Page 2 (JM-398) 1975. While the sheriff is responsible for operating the jail to provide the safekeepingof prisoners, the "county is liable for all expenses incurred in the safekeeping of prisoners confined in the county jail," except that a county transferringa prisoner to another county is liable for such expenses for the transferredprisoner. See Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 269, at 2340 (to be codified as Code Grim. Proc. art. 104.002). See a,lsoAlbert1 v. Sheriff of Harris County, m, 406 F.Supp. 649,rFD. Tex. 1975) (commissionerscourt has duty to maintain safe and suitable jail; sheriff has duty to keep safely prisonersin his custody). Pursuant to the enactment of article 5115.1, V.T.C.S., in 1975, the Commission on Jail Szandards promulgated rules and procedures relatingto minimum standardsfor admissionto and release from county jails which provide the following: 0265.6. Inmate File. An individuel file on each inmate shall be establishedon iacake. A copy of all documents that purport to legally authorize the inmate's commitment shell become a part of the inmate's record, along with information obtained under 5256.4'of this title (relating to Information about Inmates) ar.d9256.5 of this title (relating to Health Tags). 9265.11. Inmate P,roperty Checking. If an inmate :.anot going to be released, the receivingofficer shall carefullyrecord and store such of the inmate'sproperty as is taken from him and issue the imaate a receipt, signed by the receiving officer,and the inmate, to be kept in the inmate'sfile ,pendingrelease. 0269.1. Record Sgistem. The sheriff shall establish a records system for the detention~Eacility which includes: (1) a daily relcord of the number of inmates in the detention Eacility; (2) a record on each inmate, including in- formetion ob&ined during admission, all classificationsgiven him, personal property receipts, cotmftment instructions, transfer orders, release orders, date of booking and p. 1822 HonorableMorris Samford,;Ir.- Page 3 (JM-398) release, discpplinaryactions, unusual occur- rences, and any other informationrelating to the inmate'sconfinement; (3) a record of receipts and expendituresof money for ead~inmate's account. . . . (Emphasisaddsz.). 37 Tax. Admin. Code, Part IX, 55265, 267, 269. For the safety of irlnlates and to comply with jail standards, prisonersare not permittedto keep any money while confined in jail. All money remains in the custody of the sheriff where it nay be deposited in an account that serves as a depositoryfor all inmates personal funds. Normally, a prisoner must purchase certain personal items, such as soap, pr~cstampedenvelopes, tobacco, etc., which frequentlyare purchased frma a jail commissary. See 37 Tex. Admin. Code, Part IX, 04259.32, 259.132. See also AttomFGeneral Opinion MW-143 (1980). Each innate has a record that shows the receipts to and expendituresof money :irom his account, includingdebits for each purchasemade at the commissaryor wade elsawherefor the inmate. We believe that offic!.alswith the duty to operate a county jail inpliedly contract with the inmates that the jail will repay the unused balance of their accounts on their release, thereby creatinga relation analogousto that of debtor and creditor in the context of a bank and the bank's depositors. Cf. Grebe v. First State Bank of Bishop, 150 S.W.2d 64, 67 ('fax.1941); City NationalBank of Bryan v. Gustavus,106 S.W.2d 262, 264 (Tex. 1937). It is well settledthat a county commissionerscourt has only the powers conferredeither expresslyor by reasonableimplicationby the constitutionand statutesof the state. See Tex. Const. art. V, 518; Canalesv. Laughlin,214 S.W.2d 451, 453 !Tex. 1948);AttorneyGeneral Opinion C-739 (1966). It :Lsour opinion that, in order to provide safekeeping for prisoners confined in jail and to comply with the rules of the Comwissionon Jail Standards,the sheriff has a duty to keep and administer the inmates' money until their release and to repay to each the unused balance when the inmate is released. The retentionand repaymentof l-mates'money is a necessaryfunctionand expense incurred by the c.ounty"in the safekeeping of prisoners confinedin jail." As such, we concludethat a county is responsible for the repayment of funds owed to inmates by the jail, even if the funds are taken from the jail by an escaping prisoner. Cf. Attorney General Opinion H-1253 (1978). But cf. Attorney Gene= Opinion JM-170 (1984). In 1966, this office :statedin Attorney General Opinion C-739 that it found no authorizat:ton for a county to reimburseprisonersof p. 1823 . RonorableMorris Samford,Jr. - Page 4 (JM-398) a county jail for cash belmnging to prisonerswhich was taken from a county jail by escapingpris,oners.Attorney General Opinion C-739 is no longer valid because it was decided prior to the enactment of article 5115.1 and the rules of the Coamrission on Jail Standards. It has been suggesteeithat the sheriff and his sureties are legally responsiblefor the,reimbursementto prisonerswhose money is taken by a jail escapee. A sheriff may be liable to a person or entity that suffers damage resulting from his official conduct if he fails to perform his dutier!or wrongfullyor negligentlyperforms his duties. Hence, a sheriff could be liable for a loss that resulted from his negligencein keeping property in his custody. See V.T.C.S. arts. 5998 through 6003a; art. 6866. An action to recoverT&ages may be brought against a sheriff and his bondsmen for a breach of his official duties,but sureties on a sheriff'sbond are liable onlv for a violationof the conditionsof their bond. See Lasater v. Waits, 68 S.W. 500, 501 (Tex. 1902); Jeff Davis CountyTDavis, 192 S.W. 291, 294 (Tex. Civ. App. - El Pa;101917, writ ref'd). Cf. Hemphill County v. Adams, 406 S.W.2d 267, 272 (Tex. Civ. App. - tixlo 1966). rev'd on other grounds, 408 S.W.:!d926; Browning v. Graves, 152 s.w.~= (Tex. Civ. App. - Fort Worth 1941, writ ref'd). The liability of a sh.e.riffand his sureties for the sheriff's failure to faithfully pex'formhis official duties involves fact questionswhich this officr:is not equipped to answer in the opinion process. SUMMARY The retention and repayment of inmates' money by the personnelof a county jail are a necessary functionand expense incurredby the county in the safekeepingof prisoners confined in the jail. A county is responsiblefor the repayment of funds owed to inmates by the jail which are taken from the jail by an esc:aping prisoner. J-h Very truly your . JIM MATTOX AttorneyGeneral of Texas JACK HIGRTOWRR First AssistantAttorneyGeneral MARY KELLER ExecutiveAssistantAttorner General p. 1824 HonorableMorris Sanford,Jr. - Page 5 (JM-398) ROBERT GRAY SpecialAssistantAttorney General RICK GILPIN Chairman,Opinion Comittec! Preparedby Nancy Sutton AssistantAttorneyGeneral p. 1825