Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

September 16, 1966 Honorable Henry Wade Opinion NO. c-762 District Attorney Dallas County Government Re: Interpretation of Center Article 49.05, Code Dallas, Texas of Criminal Procedure Dear Mr. Wade: Your recent letter requests an opinion of this office, wherein you ask the following questions: "1. What is the interpretation of the word 'absencet as such word is con- tained in the phrase 'and in the ab- sence of any of the foregoing' which phrase is found in the second ara- graph of Section 1 of Article E9.05, Code of Criminal Procedure? As an example, situations arise where the father is presently In Viet Ram and we have been submitted the question of whether he is considered to be ab- sent under this statute. "2. That last sentence of Section 1 of Article 49.05, Code of Criminal Pro- cedure, states 'If two or more of the above-named persons ass~umec~~%+.o.rQ nS, the body, consent of one of them shall be deemed sufficient.' In regard to this sentence, we submit the follow- ing two questions concerning its inter- pretation. a) Does this sentence refer to the entire list of individuals enu- merated In the first sentence of the second aragraph of Sectlon 1 of ArtZcle E9.05, Code of Crlmi- nal Procedure? b) Under this provision, if two per- sons (i.e., two uncles) of the -3666- Honorable Henry Wade, page 2 (c-762 ) deceased assume custody of the body while the father is avail- able for consent to an autopsy, must the father still be the one to consent or is consent of one of the uncles deemed suffi- cient?" Article 49.05, Section 1, Vernon's Code of Crim- inal Procedure, provides as follows: "Consent for a licensed physician to conduct an autopsy of the body of a de- ceased person shall be deemed sufficient when given by the following: In the case of a married person, the surviving spouse, or if no spouse survive him, by any child of such marriage, or in the event of a minor child of such marriage, the guard- ian of such child if any there be, or in the absence of such guardian, the court having jurisdiction of the person of sucn minor; in the event that neither spouse nor child survives such deceased, then per- mission for an autopsy shall be valid when given by a person who would be allowed to give such permission in the case of an un- married deceased. "If the deceased be unmarried, then per- mission shall be given by the following for such autopsy, in the order stated: father, mother, guardian, or next of kin, and in the absence of any of the foregoing, by any natural person assuming custody of and responsibility for burial of the body of such deceased, If two (2) or more of the above named persons assume custody of the body, consent of one (1) of them shall be deemed sufficient." Although there are no cases defining "absence" as that term 2s used in Article 49.05, Vernon's Code of Criminal Procedure, it is the opinion of this office that the word "absence", as used therein, means "non-existent". If any of the parties enumerated in Article 49.05, Section 1, are living and are capable of giving consent, then con- sent for the autopsy must be obtained from the party upper- most on the list. Article 49.05, Section 1, Paragraph 1, -3667- Honorable Henry Wade, page 3 (C-762 ) provides that consent for autopsy must be obtained from the spouse, if the spouse survives. Paragraph 2 must be given the same construction. If the father of the de- ceased is living, then he alone can give consent to an autopsy. If all of the enumerated parties are deceased or presumed to be dead under the provisions of Article 5541, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, then consent may be ob- talned from a natural person assuming custody of and responsibility for burial of the body of such deceased. In answer to question 2(a), it Is the opinion of this office that this sentence refers only to natural persons assuming custody of and responsibility for bur- ial of the body of such deceased. A “natural person” evidently refers to any person other than those enu- merated. In answer to question 2(b), it is the opin- ion of this office that the father, if living, must give consent for the autopsy, regardless of whom assumes cus- tody of the body. SUMMARY (1) The term “absence” as used In Arti- cle 49.05, Code of Criminal Procedure, Sec- tion 1, Paragraph 2, means “non-existent”. (2)(a) The last sentence of Section 1 of Article 49.05, Code of Criminal Procedure, states: "If two (2) or more of the above named persons assume custody of the body, consent of one (1) of them shall be deemed sufficient”. This sentence refers only to natural persons assuming custody of and responsibility for burial of the body of such deceased, (2)(b) If two uncles of the deceased assume custody of the body, consent for an autopsy must nevertheless be obtained from the father if living. Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR Attorney General of Texas -3668- Honorable Henry Wade, page 4 (C-762 ) *m#~wu&g TWM/er Assistan; Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Robert E. Owen Lonny F. Zwiener Malcolm Quick John Banks APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: T. B. Wright -3669-