Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THE ATTO NEYGENERAL OIFTEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS October 1, 1949 Hon. Robert S. Calvert Opinion No. V-920 Comptroller of Public Accounts Austin, Texas Re: Salary of district judges and crlmlnal district judges dur- ing current biennium beginning September Dear Sir: 1, 1949. Referenae Is made to your request for an opln- Ion which, in part, reads as follows: "Upon the passage of House Bali Hum- ber 207, Act8 of the Regular Seeslou of the Fifty-firstLegislature,this Department sent the enclosed form letter to all the district judges of this State explalnlng the situation regarding the salary the dletrlct judges would reoelve f'ra the State beginning September 1, 1949 +%d extending through October 4, 1949. It was our constructionthat House Bill Hum- ber 207 was a nlnety day bill and will not come erreotlve until October 5, 1949. It was further the conatruotloaof this Department that said House Bill Number 20'7was not retroactive,and that dla- trict judges would be paid the period beglnnl from September 1, 1949, through October3 1949, a salary at the rate of $6,000.00'perannum under Article 681ga- 4 R.C.S. "We now have a letter brief from the district judges of the Tenth Judiclal~Dla- trlct and from the Fifty-sixthJudicial District to the errect that House Bill llwnber207 Is retroactive In nature, and that on October 5, 1949, this Department would be authorized to Issue warrant in payraentof salaries to district judges on a rate of $7,000.00 per annum covering the period from September 1st through October Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 2 (V-920) 5th. "I shall thank you to advise this De- partment whether or not House Bill Rumber 207 Is retroactive In nature and whether or not after Its errectlve date on October 5, 1949, this Department would be authoris-~ ed to lasue warrant to pay the district judges salaries at the rate or $7,000.00 per annum for the period beginning Septem- ber 1 1949 and extending through October 4, 1949. “There Is no question about the sal- ary after October 5, 1949. There Is also no question or controversyover the apprz- prlation for the payment of this salary. The pertinent provisions of Section IX of Se- nate Blll MO. 11, Acts 1 47, 50th Legislature,Chapt.er 42, page 54 (Art. 6819a-B , V.C.S.), read as follows: "From and after ,August 31, 1947, . . . The Juk@ee.of the several District Courts or the State 0r Texas and of the Criminal District Courts or this state shall each be paid an annual salary of Six Thousand ($~,ooo.oo)Dollars." This Act contained an emergency clause and uas adopted by both Houses by the necessary two-thlrds vote af all the members elect.ed,toeach House and approved by the Governor March 18, 1947, whereupon it became effec- tive. Tex.Const.Art.111,Sec.39. The pertinent provisions of'House Bill Ho. 207, Acts 51at Legislature,Chapter 328, page 614 (Art.6819a- 6, V.C.S.), are: "Section 1. From and aiter August 31, 1949, . . . (c) The Judges or the sev- eral District Courts of'the State of Texas and of the Crlmlnal District Courts of this State shall each be paid an annual salary of Seven Thousand Dollars ($7,000). "(a) The salaries of all the Jus- tices and Judges In this Section shall be paid in equal monthly Installments. Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 3 (V-920) "(e) Each District Judge in this State shall be paid an annual salary of Seven.Thou- sand Dollars ($7,000)from State funds, pro- vided that no Dlstrlat Judge shall receive as supplementalpay thereto frcuuauy oountJr funds a sum In excess 0r Twenty-nine,Xun- dred Dollars ($2,900)per album for services rendered as a member of a Juvenile Board. 'Sec. 2. Senate Bill lfo.11, Chapter 42, page 54, Acts or the Flitlath Legisla- tare and all laws and part8 0r laws in oon- filet with this Act, are hereby repealed." Section 3 declares the provisions of the Act to be severable. Section 4 Is an emergency clause. Houee Bill Ho. 207 paeaed the Houae~on -~a, 1949, by a vote of 94 yeae; passed the Senate oa J&y 26, 1949, by a vote of 20 yeas, and was approved by the Qov- ernor June 6, 1949. The 51st Legislature adjourned on Julf 6, 1949. In the brief mentioned In xour request, It is admitted that House Bill 207 does not beoom ~eifectlve until October 5, 1949. We agree with that admfaslon. !Pheonly contention made In the brief is that when thLs Act does become erreotlve It will, In so far a8 these salaries are concerned, relate back to and become opera- tive on September 1, 1949 ior such was the intention of the Legislature. We do not deem It necessary toLpasa up- on the question raised by this oontentlon,for reasons hereafter stated. The title of House Bill Ho. 320, Acts 51st Leg- islature, Chapter 585, among other things not pertinent to TIIWquestion, reads: "An Act making an appropriationfor the SUQQOl’t and mlntenance of the Judl- clary or the State of Texas for the blen- nitsabeglnnlng September 1, 1949, and ending August 31, 1951 . . . suspending all laws in conflict herewith . . . and deolarlng an emergency." Item 1 of House Bill 320, page 1166, m&as a appropriationor $952,000 ror each year of the ourrent blennlum to pay: "Salariesor 136 Dlstrlet Judges and Crlmlnal District Judges at $7,000 per Year Hon. Robert S. Calvert,,page 4 (V-920) whloh shall include 118th and 134th Dls- tricts.g Section 9 oi the general rldelrsattached to House Bill lo. 320 proyldea: "All laws and parts of laws In con- flict herewith are hereby suspended for the period of the biennium for which this appropriationla made." The.rule Is that laws cannot be amended or re- pealed by general appropriationbills when suoh changes constitute a separate and additional subject or purpose. (Art. III, See.35, Texas Const.). However, this does not apply to the provisions of House Bill 320 now under consideration. They relate to and comprise a single subject. Since both the title and body of Rouse Bill Ho. 320 provide for the suspension of all laws in cou- fllct with Its provisions, and the fact that the sus- pension of such laws Is Incidental to Its subject (a~- proprlatlons),Including aalarles of district judges and criminal district judges, we are not prepared to say that the provisions of Section $3do not have the effect of suspending the provisiona of Senate Bill No. 11, Acts 50th Legislature,for the peribd of the biennium begin- ning September 1, 1949. You are therefore advised It Is the opinion of this orrlce that the salaries or district judges and crlmlnal district judges have been fixed by the Legls- lature at $7,000 per annum for the current biennium, be- ginning September 1, 1949, payable In twelve equal month- ly Installments,as provided in House Bill lo. 320. SUMl4ARY The Legislaturehas,fixed the sal- aries or district judges and orUlna district judges ror the biennium begln- nlng September 1, 1949, at ,$7,000, per annum, payable In twelve equal monthly Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 5 (V-920) Installments. H.B. N0.320, Acts 51st Leg., Ch. 585, p.1160, et seq. Yours very truly, ATTORNE!?OEllERALOFTE]LAs /!L 4.55 BWB:wb:erc:mw BY p-9I Bruce W. Bryant Assistant