Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

RNEYGENERAIL OR? TEXAS Aus-rm.T~XAs June 16, 1948 Hon. Tom DeBerry Opinion No. V-605 Board of Control Austin, Texas Re: The authority of the Board of Control to make refunds of over- payments of Federal meat subsidies to State eleemosynary institutions. Dear Sir: In your letter of May 14, 1948, you state that various State ,schoolsand eleemosynary institu- tions had received meat subsidies from the Federal Government and that now the Reconstruction Finance Corporation on behalf of the Federal Government has made claim against the Board of Control for overpay- ments in the amounts set out to the following insti- tutions: Abilene State Hospital ..........$ 88.88 Gatesville State School for Boys 76.59 Gainesville State School for Girls 42.87 State Tuberculosis Sanatorium.... 436.79 Terre11 State Hospital .......... 1037.23 You further state that all meat subsidy pay- ments were eventually deposited in the State Treasury. Your inquiry is as follows: Whether we would be authorized to make a refund payment to the Reconstruc- tion Finance Corporation for the amounts shown above if such amounts are found to be the correct amounts of overpayment." Article 3179, V. C. S. directs the State Treasurer to deposit all money received from the in- stitutions involved to the credit of the general rev- enue fund of the State. The treasurer has informed us that the meat subsidy payments received by these insti- tutions have been credited to the general revenue fund. ‘. Hon. Tom DeBerry, page 2 (Vi6051 Article VIII, Section 6 of the Constitution of Texas , provides: "No money shall be dram from the Treasury but in pursuance of specific appropriations made by law a . *" 38 Tex. Jur., Sec. 27, page 844, says: "Under the Constitution no money shall be drawn from the treasury but in pursuance of specific appropriations made by law - a prohibition-that may snot be ignored or evaded." (Underscor- ing ours.) The case of Manion v. Lockhart, State Treas- urer; 114 S.W.(2d) 216, 131 Tex. 175, involved a simi- lar question. In this case relator Manion applied for a writ of mandamus to compel the Treasurer of Texas to pay to him a sum of money which legally belonged to him. The State Treasurer had deposited the money in the general revenue fund. The Supreme Court said: "He (State Treasurer) in good faith deposited such money in the gen- eral revenue fund, which now requires that it be appropriated by the Legisla- ture in accordance with the provisions of section 6 of article 8 of the Con- stitution. Respondent does not now have in his possession such funds, and, therefore, he is unable, without an act of the Legislature, to pay same to those ~entitled thereto. . . "It is undisputed that relator has . fully complied with the law and is en- titled to be paid the sum of money claim- ed by him, It is not shown, however, that relator cannot obtain the money due him by another complete and adequate remedy. While it is true that the money due relator hasbeen placed in the gener- al revenue fund, the Legislature has not refused to make a specific appropriation to pay relator's demand therefor." Hon. Tom DeBerry, page 3 (v-605) We have carefully examined Senate Bill No. 374 passed by the 50th Legislature, in which current appropriations were made for the eleemosynary insti- tutions involved herein. There is no fund in this appropriation bill out of which a refund could be made to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation for the alleged overpayments of meat subsidies. Since the subsidy payments have already been deposited in the general revenue fund and since there are no current appropriations out of which a refund could be made to the Reconstruction Finance Corpora- tion, we are of the opinion that you are not author- ized to make such a refund. Having answered your first question in the negative, we do not deem it necessary to answer your second question. SUMMARY Under the circumstances stated, the State Board of Control is not authorized to pay to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation refunds of overpayments of Federal meat subsidies received by State Eleemosynary Institutions, in the absence of an appropriation for that purpose. Yours very truly, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS -, Clinton Foshee Assistant CF:mw:erc