Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

THE AYTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS Grover Sellers Aun-rxiw 1,. TEXAS Honorable Coke R. Stevenson Governor of Texas Austin, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No.,O-6626 Re: @ether certificate from the Comptroller of Public Accounts is necessary to give effect to the appropriation made by Rouss~ Bill No. 56 of the Forty- ninth Legislature. Your request for opinion has been received and carefully considered by this department. We quote from your request as follows: "Rouse Bill No. 56, commonly known as the Road Bond Service Act, has been passed by the Legislature, signed by me, and filed with the Secretary of State. A copy of the bill is hereto attached. "The act appropriates all of the moneys coming into the County and Road District Highway Fund for the purpose of paying the State's porkion of the County and Road District Bonds which are eligible under the present law. Section 49a of Article III of the Constitution, among other things, provides:, “‘From and after January 1, 1945, no bill con- taining an appropriation shall be oonsidered as passed or be sent to the Governor for Consideration until and unless the Comptroller of Public Accounts endorses his certifioate thereon showing that the amount appropriated is within the amount estimated to be avilable in the affected funds.1 Vhis provision was not complied with in respect to Hovse Bill No. 56. The bill was presented to House Bill No. 56. The bill was presented to me without any certificate from the Comptroller and was signed and filed by me with the Secretary of State without any such oertifiohte. The question submitted for your detsrmina- tion is whether or not such certificate was necessary. Hon. Coke R. Stevenson - Page 2, O-6626 “When all of the provisions of Section 49a are considered together, it appears to be a measure of control over the action of the Legislature in making appropriations in excess of anticipated revenues in the respective funds. The Comptroller is the book- keeper for the State and when appropriations are made in a stated amount in dollars and cents from time to time by the Legisiature, it is quite evident that each bill appropriating money should bear the certificate referred to. Such procedure is necessary in order to comply with the following provisions from said Article 49a: “?From and after January 1, 1945, save in the case of emergency and imperative public necessity and with a four-fifths vote of the total membership of each House, no appropriation in exoess of the cash and anticipated revenue of the funds from which such appropriation is to be made shall be valid.’ “‘You will note from the text of Rouse Bill No. 56 that no stated amount is me-niioned in the bill and therefore the appropriation could not be in excess of the cash anticipated revenues of the funds from which such, appropriation is to be made. The bill only appropriates the moneys to be deposited in the affected fund for a given period. The fund is created by exist- ing law and the allocation of revenues directed to he placed in said fund has already been made by existing laws. House Bill no. 56 only makes th,? appropriation of the fund to the purpose for which it was created and only in the amount whioh may ba deposited in the fund. The matter is one of Great importance, however) to th.e Counties and Road ‘Districts of this Sta-te and yolur opinion therefore respectfully requested as to whether th,n certificate from the Comptroller, ils above referred to, is necessary to give effect to the appropriation made by House Bill NO. 56.” Said House Bill 56 reads in part as follows: “H. B. No. 56, A BILL To Be Entitled “An Act amending subsection (j) and (a) of Section 7 of Chap ‘tar 13, Acts of the Third Called Session of the FL. Y--second Legislature, as amended by Section 6 of s. 0. Eo. 89, Chapter 324, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-eighth Legislature* making an appropriation for the biennium beginning September 1, 1945, and ending August 31, 1947, of moneys coming Hon. Coke R. Stevenson - Page 3, O-6626 into the County and Road District Highway Fund; establishing a sequence for appropriations from said Fund for each year thereafter; . . . "Ee it Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas: "Section 1. That subsection (j) of Section 7 of Chapter 13, Acts of the Third called session of the Forty-second Legislature, as amended by Sedtion 6 of S. B. No. 89, Chapter 324, Acts of the Regular Session of the Forty-eight Legislature, be, and the same is hereby amended ao as to~hereaf'ter read as follows: "'(j) All moneys to be deposited to the credit of the County and Road District Highway Fund, from September 1, 1945, to August 31, 1947, both inclusive, are hereby appropriated to said respective counties and defined road dI.stri.ots and shall be received, held, used and appJ.ied by the State Treasurer, as ex-offLcio Treasurer of said respective counties and defTned road districts, for the purposes and uses more specifically set forth in this Act, including the payment of principal, interest and sinking fund requirements on all eligible obligations maturing up to and including August 31, 1947. And each year thereafter until all of such eligible obligations are fully paid, all moneys coming into the credit of the County and Road District Highway Fund with the State Treasurer, and all moneys remaining therein from any previous year shall be received and held by him as ex-officio Treasurer of such counties and defined road districts, and shall first be subject to the appropriation for the payment of interest, principal and sinking funds maturing from time to time on said eligible obligations, and them for the other uses specified and permitted in this Act. . . . "Sec. 3. The fact that it is necessary to make the above biennial appropriation to keep the Road Bond Assumption Act in fullt force and effect and the further fact that it La highly desirable for the effective functioning of said Act to make said appropriation at the earliest practicable date create an emergency and an imperativa public necessity that the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read i,n three several days in both Houses be suspended, and SE::' rule is hereby suspended, and this Act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage, and it is ao enacted." Hon. Coke R. Stevenson - Page 4, O-6626 The statement ti your letter as follows: "You will note from the text of House Bill No. 56 that no stated amount is mentioned in the bill and therefore the appropriation could not be in excess of the cash and anticipated revenues of the funds from which such appropriation is to be made. The bill only appropriates the moneys to be deposited in the affected fund for a given period. The fund is created by exist- ing law and the allocation of revenues directed to be placed in said fund has already been made by existing lams. House Bill No. 56 only makes the appropriation of the fund to the purpose for which it was created and only in the amount which may be deposited in the fund." we think is an accurate and reasonable construction of H.B. 56 and we agree with same. It is, therefore, our opinion that H. B. 56 did not require the certificate inquired about. Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENERAL CF TEXAS s/ Wm. J. Fanning BY WJF:bt-cg Wm. J. Fanning Assistant APPROVED MAY 31, 1945 s/ Carlos C. Ashley FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL APPROVED: Opinion Committee BWB, Chairman