Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

390 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN co&ml, Tmx8r au art oplafoa lo. o-64 lb1 aothu M urnhue Jorrr roqw#t for “of *hother or Qot a5 ofifuia 1.2.8llf quufr and aat aB Cl br the Citr Comimlowr~ not osboth0rth0~ lolr of the State ro Ytui41 uo pov1d.d OfSlelal oourt ropoptwr we moridod for by hrtl- Qh 2321, et ma*, B* c. b., 1935. ArtLo 2% provldmr lah dlstrlet md rrimlml dlatriat W wu lgpsint M 0friofmi 00wt nwrt*r d! 0 ahO1 b el IR)orQ offloc of the aourt u&d -11 hold p o flic . dwlq th 8 p lW8ur . Of zb r QO=t. l l l Ronora8k John 0. lhrrla, m 2 hr810lo23= ~oadaa fw uw rrpoPtu'0 taklag SO oath “that ha rlll~011lc¶ truly la aa iqYrtla1mnnar keep 8 cornet roaopd of all lv%dmaa orfarad ln w@h ema report- ad by hlwR A~tlcla2324 makes it tb dutf ot tba reporter to *ttotiall waaloaa or Lb* oourt~to taka full rhorw Mk@ ofallarul t*atl8aayalfuadlao~aew t?m La -ld a-ta to6aUur rith all objaatloaa to t&a admiaolblllt~ o fth e lvUoaoo, tha rall~a aad rowka of the aourt,and lxktoptloor~to poauta a ll &ll akorthand no800 tabal to furmiah any praoa a trumrlpt lrgootha gepaa8 of foes po- rued bT l&u. %Se onaula68rtlolarpovlda Ior tha roportu*a oorprarrrtleauulu~owr Pubnpr the moat exhauatlva amd oomprahonal~a ro- vi011 or tba authoritloa 00 t&a quaatiorrof ctvil 0fri000 ap- gmur 10 stOt8 0i Ho fM nO l rrl. Juliuslkrmr vr R. 1. Hauklar, 2S? Pac. all, 53 A. L. R. 58% ti quoto thuofra 00 r0ii000 8 *There us a oat many juillai414aulaiosra deehill tha rord a officolor tha uorda lpubUo The aubjootla an old oae,ad tha daal- llo r uestrnd far Wok. 8ooa or tha do81010R0 ltraaa OIU teat; othuoama othu. lbwuor, la maarll8ll bra roundaertaln lm0 tOotwO that at8od out gwmUwbt1y. Toquoto irO8al lurrllkad would ortond this o9ioloomushbapnd raammabla lon#h. Emovar, vo &all qwta hero froll sow doolaioaa aad doiinitioru uhloblllaotrete, to aofm oxtoot, tbr varleuaaaaaotiala of publieof- i100, lm#i8aiwd br tha oourta 8wl othar author- 1ti.0,maa rhish lt8to loII Of the thf~o tbt hava boo bald Paqulalto. "IAn&f&a* 1~ deflwd by pod lAhorltv aa tivolv.riog b dalogatloa to tha indlvldcul of lo= o r C& loruolgn fwlatioaa of ptarammt, to ba Moauabls Joha 0. Morris, pago 3 l ‘uhua ..*tk aofU.aar lxuelra lmp mta a t public dutiaa uhd be delepkd to him aone or t~u fuwtlooa of eowramaat W his oiS:oe la ior l flxad Cur aad tha pouara, dutlaa aud a8olumanta aowoyaat~ koow raakd ia l lnaoeaao~ uhaa tha orfioe kk- se auab u offlai8l rry pro r4 lie ortloar 1 lUshlo *, PE -1-8 215 Pa. r~P6 L.&A. (1. 8.) 289, tr A&l. 430. “Uls d~t~a must rot k mm alerl6a1,0 th0W 0EQ Of 88 -Et or YPUat, Y titaunt k pr- tamad in tba axaoutlaa or admloiatr~tioa of tba lav, la t& lxuolu of pouu aad authority Be- ltouad br tba kv.’ ACCT. Oaf&.v. TlllUghaat, 203 Rosa. 539, 93, 89 1I.B. 1060, 17 &a. Coo. 449. l . ... “The moo8 &mars1 distinctlam OS a publfa of- flu0 la, that it eabrwea tl’u mriorwnoe by the loomhat of a publio fuaatloa delegated to him 00l gut of tha lorwalgnt~ of tkw atata. ) Stata “‘mr~ olilaa w&at tha Cmatftutlon Sm$+llaa ma 4uthorlt~ to aurolaa l?sy partioa elf tha aovuotgn pouor of tb •trt:Le~lt; in makin& lxooutm or bd8lnlate~l Olmatssd v. Mu York, X0 Joaor L 8. 3 4 1. l l . .. apnotlo811y 411 of tha wthorltiaa, houvar, &old that to UL alfloor OPa paatad lou of tha aovar*iga poua~a of tha govorammt, Co be exer- olaad for tha baoilt of tin publlo. Thaf hold, - I 393 Baro&blo Joba 0. Barrrla, pp 4 "The tom lafftiom ~la a l dologatloa 02 a paPtiM of tha aovu*lsa powuB sad tha paawaaioa ' of it b7 tb porrolr tlllw tb8 ofilao. dOfhltlM WrbO rlth 18 0% vi to&al s ;t$$: lP ldoa ChOt tha parru dol**td #rat k arolaad 0 tbe,m~r~n b his mm rQht sad set io, mothar*a 8taCo Me ml. wa ve Chrlatua, 104 ewe) Ths MY of RWtaoa we RI&la Oouaty, 84 8. w. 1097, uoaa mda~~tadlPQf,~~ 84. *hat &at la lm all rtarial roamata mraUo1to tBa palalooa or tha paaoat l tatukaa, noted ottova. RoWoloP, tha 19OYAot a&d tha torr 'otiLola1 lt@ wg r @ p h1WtaOd a ?’ Of'otfioial P@port@r.m The &t pwgd- ld for their Wpl.ntmaat by ?&a judges of tha dlatrlat courts, cud d4aluad that they should bo %uora olflcara of rho oourt,’ aad rbouldhold tbriroff100 dwtrrgthe glaaauro o? tbr aourt. Tha dutlaa raqultod of la@h oifl.el8lrtoaograp?wr vorq tba m as thoaa pwontl7 ?rgpirod Ot UI oitlalal -portor. Robartaorr fo md auri.aaa sa d lwd the 0ouOtxto reoovu a balaaoo al r pd to k aw bin thaoafor. Tha oma- tl dafoPdrd 00,tha &rmmd t&t thaAct of 1903 vaa vlolatlve of kotfoo JO ol Artlolo XVI of tbn GoQatltutlon, rhInh pro- vides %hat tb duratloa ot 011 offloes rook fixed by this Corratltutiao ahall mvar uoaad tuo four.” Aaaa8uahaatho ceurt*a trrgucrga la root lllu8laatlng, 9ra vlll quota frcu It more or leaa at lan&h. !f& drria1tioa cd the term ‘stfi#e ’ as &a*bi I&. Naohar ia hla work oa ?ublle Of?L- oopa; la qwted with lpprovel by ow 8upraaa Court io tha ammoof Xlrbrot@ vs Raraatt 93 To%. 301, 55 8. u, SO, sad la 80 ~olloma~ at pub110 offlca la tbm tight, luUmrlt~,ld duttoroatadand ooo- forrod by lav,b7 uhlch,for 0 &.kvoa parlod, amar f-6b lBV 02ldWio (88l - p h 8OwOfth r ar~tilypovu,~hdlvld~llaln~at8d~lLha~ portionoftha aovue ruaotlou of khe warn- mm:, to ba exaroiaad % hla for tho tanal r t or the oat ooafu upou tha Xoaombla Joha 0. Rarrla, plga 5 orfloa la em l8ploywo8, it does not follm tbt every oeplogmaar la aa offlo~. * ml Ha43ham,10 his vork on trrblia Offloua, soya: %a mat im- pWtMt Obrmto?lOtiO vhleh dlatl~talr&@ aa of- tloo from an lqAo~at or aontraat la th8t tha artitiom rPa la a fur o!~ aa offloo t8volv*al dologlrtioa to thv Sndlvldwl of aoma of 8ba cover- @* iUMCiOW of gOlo?oIat,to ba lurclwd by hi8 ru tha hauflt of the plbll0~ t& tlema pop- Clw of t& roroPo%gDty or tb eopot?y, .1thep bg- la~tlva, uaoutlva, u jvdlalal, lttaahma Sco tbm tlr baiau, to be uaealaad for tha pub118baaeflt. Ualoaa the pouua~ ooafarred are 0s this a8tora tha ladlvldval la not & publla offlau.~ Mou, da the SaaC that tb poaltioa OS lt~no~a~r la daalgMtad 1~ tha sot porldima for, 18s oP~8tloo. 00 an offloo,sad that it deolura that tha rho ml ba e8llod to patiara lta duties *&g* a sworn offlou al tba oowt, * Uforda aom peaaon for datarmlning it to k l wh, still it ia bellevod the plaea 900000000noae of thou aoverolgn funo- tlon8 of the jvdielal de*twnt of the govera- meat to vhleh it rdlataa, to dlatlngtiab 18 from a mope employment to glrrorm a apeat servle~, under 9ubllu ltlmrlty, for the laaiatawe,+d aoa- vanlawe of tha oowt md partlao lltlgaat them- usk;;aihloh ao judlvlal dlauvvtlw .w jud@mat La . T&JO oreatlon of tlm p0aitlaa, as shown br ths varr tarma 0s the a8 t, us0 daalmad for 00 okhar ~wpbmaa the to &~ovida MP, 601 by Uzntb oral lvidorrao offorad, ltd o%har pOuaad volvw objrotlooamda to adW.aalbillt~ 9a tOO~l- ulo~, the rumigof tha oourt, and lxaaptlcoa thereto, afght be wkea -ia ahorthmd, 00 a vthod or prmanw t&em mttara as thar oaaurrad, with- out do&$&n8 trIala, to be 8ftarvarda trarorlbd and fumhhad tha oourt and put100 to the cult, to aid tha8 :n ma 8uow4ta 8ad p-t pematl0a or uw reoord. mba report or tranaorigt 0s the prowedlaga by 8bo ltawgraphar 10 sot bLodiarl# however, upon th0 OOUPC,@Ed MJ b0 OdO t@~aO;p- Jeo:ad a: hladla8Patio~. lo set vhf&a & th0pimd to do lo lndopandant of Un eootr01 0f ot&ra, QC veakd in hill as a lwwer Wv to by warolaed *a a rrsbt or mar0 tire or a udioirl off 100. we OOQO~~ th m tuhfYa th e p o o l:1o n o f l 395 Boaorabla John 0. Xarrir, pago 6 ateaopaphu, undo0 tlwltatutr in thla stab, ma7 be, in b 88~88, an offloa, end tha term theraof my oontinua for a loogar period than two pus, yet tbara la no ouch lovuelgn funetlon of govrra- aant lnbraaad lo the pouara oonforrod upon tha la- d:vlduBl parforming 188 dutlaa 88 brlaga it ulth- lu tb, maanlngor tha word ~oftlaa*as used 1st tha aaatloa of tha ConatltutOen quota&” It 10 dlffloult to proolva h o wl roportor, by vlrtw of his not bol voatod with w. aoverolgn functions 8Ould fall to ba an 7o floor vlthla t& neanlw or Saetlon 30 and rt tba aam tlma bo an officer within t&m maanlng of Sootlou 40. The aalar qualltla8 mka a 9araoo aa offloor under both. The cola additlotul alamat lpeolfled la Seotloa 40 Is that the orrica ba ona or lmolumont~ J Us ma not unmindful of oana llka Otto v. Urea, 185 S. Y. 350, end Dunn v. Allan, 63 S. U. (26) 857, uharela tha oourta &TO locurd wrlta oi mandanua to aampal rrportarato prepare ltatamata 0s rwt lo a0000 where tha party requeat- lng aamu has flled a pupergo oath. Ia the llmltad leaaa oaf7 that la naceaaary to rupport a aft 0s mandamus a reporter mey be ctmaldued an offlear. iiouavar, It la lxlomtia that smndamua lies to enforcr the puformawa of a noa-dlaeratlon- ary oat or duty; that the writ will iaaw otiy whoa the act or duty la ninlrtarlal lo charouter, and not vhea the sot in any nuaaura lnvolvaa the uarolaa of dlacretloo or j\rdgUPt. 28 Tax. Jur. 537, kc. 0. m oat oomandad to ba done la not OM vhleh would oonatltute the holder t&roof aa OfffOer in t& aanae used la Smatloa 10 of the COEatltUtiOE under the authorltlaa above rahrrrd to. Yo uus ld?Uad, &erafope, that there la no uon- rtltutirwl lnhlbltlon lgaloat an offla~l aourt reporter’s quallfylng as elty lttorruJ under an lppolntuat by the city oomlaolonar. Ue baliovo that thla ruil~ a.navera~our lapulrr. Aa8latant