OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
GROVERSELLERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
fioaoribleT. U. Trlmbl~
Flret ;rrslstant
Stat. iiuparintendentof Publio fn8trUOtlOn
hu;t in, Teiar
Thirty-ninth fauielatulri,
aatually 1A faot repeal..
the exemption olauae.ai,:
ffouw ail1 No. 586, TMrty-
second:LegielatureP (Great-
in6 lla IAdOpOAdeAt SO&O01
Di8trlot)
.~.
me era in rweipt oi your letter or recent dste, read-
iag ~3 r0110w8:
We would llkn to call your attsntloa to H.
9. xo. 5593, irota, oi the 32nd Lagislntura, 1911,
meatlog the Sriggr IA4epeAdcat Soho District in
Uurnet County, aa vmll a8 to S. B. Xo. 227, Aots of
tim 39th Legislature, 1923, whioh undertook to repeal
a portion or 9, B. NO. !%5 with rorareAO0 to exeq-
tion rr0i4 cousty supervision.
~59x1cotmthitutlon, ..rtlolr3, Lh3otlon 57, re-
ierring to looal bills, providea thut no local bill
14th certain eraeptione may be fntroduoed without
having flret been pQbllshed for thirty days, and thut
such publictition sust acompany the local bill in the
Legislature.
“Please advise us whether or not 3. B. No. 227,
:iCtS ot the 39th Legislature, 1925, actually in fact
lepeoledthe exemption clause of H. B. Xo. 585, .;cts
of the 32nd Legislature, 1911.”
HoAOrlibleT. ;b. Trimble, page 2
IA the year 1925, Seation 5 of titicle 7 authorized
the Legisl&ure to oreute school dlatriote by speoial law, without
the notice required by article 3, SeOtiOA 56. See Powell Y. Charoo
IAdepeAaent ~abool Xstrict, 203, 9. i'i.1178. Seotion 3 of arti-
ole 7 was amended at the November election 1926, since whioh tine
the Legislature nsy create sohool distrlcteby geAbrk3.l
lsWs.OAly.
You are advised, thererore, that Senate Bill No.:'227,
Hots of the 39th Legislature, whioh was passed prior to t* 1926
amend-at is OOAstitUtioAal eAd repealed the eXemptioA clauee Or
House Bill 585, AQte ot the 32Ad Legislature, 1911.
Yours very truly
irasistant
CFG:EFP