Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

14s OFFICE OFTfifi AlTORNEY GRNRRALOF~ AUSTtN HOBOlY4bh Ooorge FT.SIeypar4 Comptroller Publie .4ooouuts motin, texaa Dear Sir: an4 r*,latsdquis; an interprotatiu passed at the Ha litlm. ime 6eaate Bill salon of the advise this de- his ~111 will affect the rentals aacruing under lease , 1943, which la the effeot- lmpoees a duty upon all Uepfirtsients and agenolo::of the State (2orernment;when r@crtal spnoe is nea4a4 for carrylug on the eawatial funo- tion8 of such agencies or departments of the State Government, to submit to the State Board of control a request giving tbe type, kind, an& stzs of build- ing needed, together with any other nroeeeary 146 TTO~.George F. SheFpati, page 2 description, aad to state the purpose for nhlab it will be urei3m4 the need therefor; end, if ln the dfrcretion of the Board ruoh epeoe tr needed, the Boar4 of control ray prooeed to ad- vertise an4 let bide, eto. “Thie statute doer not prescribe a penalty for failure of ruoh departments or agenofos of the State Oovernment to make the request to the Boar4 Of Control. *r2. Is this d*prrtment authorized to iawe warrant in pafPsnt OS olalm for rental where the deQaStI&eBtfailed to COD&plywith ,4.B. 190.2667” Sanati.Bill 266 warnensoted by tha 48th Legiolature as C.hapt& 2S?& .&&o 194b. xeaording to 8 tootnote appearing on page St38of Vernon*a Texae Sesrion Law Sex-vloe,this Act will be lnoluded in Vernon’@ Annotated civil Statute8 ae Art- fole 6bUb. POC the plrporresof thin opinion, however, we shall rafer to this 1eg:isletlonhereinafter a6 senate Bill xo. 266, or simply as the Bill or the not. The portion8 of thla le(lltGatloawith rhleh your inquiries ora ooaoorned, being E.eetiona%, 2 and 3 of the Rot, rea4 aa followe: %eotion 1. Hereafter all departmat an4 ag4nolea or the State Government, when rental epaoe Le needed for aarrylng on the lroantlal shsllQT*Ubmy%T+ttr runotlone of suoh agenoles de of the State Ootarnment, 3% the State Soar4 of control a rqueat therefoti;-#viag the trpe, kfnd, an4 size of building needed,,together with any other neaeseary deeaription, and etatfng the purpose for whloh It will be used and the need therefor. *Ssotlon 2. ';'he state mar4 of control, upon rsoelpt of suoh requeet, an4 if the money haa been made available to puy the rental thereon, and if, in ths diucretlm of the Board euah apaoe ir neede4, 147 Boa. ueorge 2. Sheppard, Page 3 shall forthwith e4vertiee in a newspaper,which haa been ragularly publlehed an4 QirOulb.te4in the city, or town, where auah rental epeos is wrought,for bids cm suoh rental spaoe, for the uees indioated and Sor 8 period Of not to eroeed two yaars. After such bids have beon reoeived by the State Boer4 of control at its principal offios in Austin, Tbxaa, an4 publioly opened, the slwardfor suah rental oontract will be mmde to the lowset en4 beat bidder, en4 upon euoh other terms aa may be agreed u9on. The term0 of the oontreat, together with the notice of the eward of the state Barr4 of Control wfll bs submitted to the .AttoraeyUeneral of Texas, who will oause to be prepared end ereouted in aocordance with the terms of the agreement suoh aontrsat in qua4ruplloete; one oi whaiolt .will be kept by eaoh party thareto, one by the State Boar4 of Control, cm4 one by the Attorney Goneral of Tesao. The partiee to such eontract will be thr departnent or agenoy or‘ the.govern- ment using the epaae as lessee an4 the party renting the space as lea8or. "Seotion 3. aithin thirty d4pr after thm effeotlre date of this Aat, all departments 8~4 agenoies of the state Cwerrsnt at thir time Ieaaing or renting spa04 from any peraoa, rim3i, or corporation whosmoever, rrilloause to be prc pare4 and delivered to the &ate Board of control in ?.ustin,Texas, a copy of any wrttton rental or lease a~retment now in foroe an4 ourrent, or any statement of any ore1 underatendlag upon which any leaee or rsntal public funds em being ex- pended, if 6uoh action has not already bsen taken.+ This bill wac pas844 unaniaoualy by both houses of the Leei mlature, and, under its emergenay olauae es you state4 in your letter, it beoeme effective imae4stely upon approval on Way 7th. your first inquiry raises the question of whether the Aot lnvalidat$s or oonditionr bxii?ititxg ~eaaes, and gives Xon. Gsorge R. Shei;pard,Page 4 rise to the following two propoaltlona: (1) whether the Legislature by anaotmnt of the first two amotions of tba Bill Intended to canoal existing lease8 and rental agrea- wnta and thus to require Stats departments and aganoies lmedl8taly to socure naw ooatraota nndor the method pn- scribed In these two la o tia naln4 ; / o(E) r ahrthor the Laglalatur8 intended to oondltian ths oontiaurd arlatonoe of leams end rantal agreuasnta upon a lft8rrl aompllana* by auoh d8partmmta and agsnol88 with the provisions of r,aotlon3 of the Act. Ii sither ar both or three prOpo8itionS 8hOuld b8 resolved in the affirimtlve, than the Act right oonoelrably affoot the paymant or current rentals under existing eon- treat6 rhfoh Jmd their lnoeption prior to l&y 7th. If both should ba roaolred in the wgatlva, w8 would be repulrod to hold that the Aot has no effeot upon tha paymontr la question. In the abwnoa of any lnforastlon to the oontraxy, we aaaume that all of the oontraotm you haoe,$n tind wera valid agroenenta, properly mtardd into, an~~olndiag upon the Btattiprior to Kay 7th. v It 1s well srttlad tkatuhon the Stat8 m&or a oontraot it iu as mob bound thereby a8 a oltdeen uauld br bound upon a like ooatraot. 8tat8 v. IUllot (clv. App., &dV8StOD, 1919) 212 D. %. 69$, 8rrOr refu8sd. The aloak Of crorrl’dgnty does not l?S118V8 the State uf the duty to r8apoOt lta oontmotual obllgation8. The faot that It uaa- not be eu8d without its oona8nt in no way detracts rrfm the propOaltlon that it la llabl8 wasr Ifs QOnbr8Ot8. As pointed Out by Chief SUatiO8 MOCl8ndOlIOf th0 au&in Court af Civil Appeals, 'The lmpotenor 0r prlrat8 lndlrlduals to enforoe ttrough thdr oourt8 thrlr Ocmtnotucrl rights against th8 Steie, by re8ilOnOf lnabllltjrto au8 tb0 State without its oonaeat . . . dces not affeot the blndlng force Of state ObligatlOn8. . ." Stat8 V. Elliot, aupra. The sanctity of oontr8ota 18 aafeguanbd by both th* Conetltutlon of Texas and the Ooaatitution Of th8 Unft@d States. :l49 Hon. George il.:;heppard,Pa&e 5 SeOtiOn 16 of Arti I Of the State ConetitutIon, a part of aur Sill of Righta, provides: ";lio bill oX attainder, ex post faoto 1au, retroaotlve law, or any law impairing the ob- ligation of oontraota shall be mado." Ceation 10 of Art1018 1 of th8 Fadsral Constitution prorldeia: *No