Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL- OF TEXAS AUSTIN Xonora~ls %. Riley Texas 2rieon EoarQ Eri%dy%llildhlg 6an antonlo, Tsxes Deeer our.Siyattt ft&rabie U. Rile::3yat.t-.p*gc 22 ~4.tek%'%vl~%m% co5cerr&1~ the conduct of any and all oi~lolalsena araploy%~s of the Texas Prlpon ~a- $%q aad report salB ~oamalttes~~e flnciln@,meether rulththe sobatena%of such eo/dano% awlin the acia- mittoe*s oplnlcn Rlcht te portfrtsntto lts flndln@9, . to tha Forty-ninthLe(:lalstum. *said oomcittea m47 hold Its 5eGGlcns at the CsplWl or at the Stats Penitentiaryst Eunts- oillo, or at sny of the Farm8 ooonnaoted ritb the State iJrlso0SyGtex, end au17 uatu9e wltasssee to ap- pear at an7 plaa6rheFe SGid s%selonio are held, and .. ahall beentltle~.to 9~. frm the fund h%r%lnett%r set asiaa, for 8311of Its eatual nsasosary travrllag ena other erpexmes. . "T&w% is heraby crpproprlateaout 0r tha, Coitlri~ntEsp%ns% Fund of the Foity-%l&atbX.%&la- tam the ltwaof rtftaerlIIuRareqDollars (gkK!01 to meetths payment of zmqeseary expmws lmmrr& by Geld oouQnltt~** l?ouscBiaple R%solutlon.Bo.311, it ~111 b% neat, 3s not ~1,broads61 txm@ohsrtsi~e ut Sancte Reoo-‘ hi&n .srOi.,4 aonsi&ered ln oar orIgina opirilonWo. 0-524s. Th% autharltyexpxwmly mnferr%d In th& Hciune?waolut.ion 1s."wJ ask@ e tbozwu& lRv%atlga~tim of the Wisce Bptea a& Itaomanapaent,~ulth cdtthar- _. . It.7to sumuoa wit44eres sna 44lllpal thefr attenaa44e upon it8 ~MS~OIIB, ana tak% waefi48 oonosr~fne the oollduot ot any ma,.m otfl4id4 45a ~107wm 0r th4 ;; .TexasPrison syatm, end reportnaid~oarrPlittseta find- In&p, together with t$% stabstianao of suah avl&moe ae in the 04waltteotsopinion ni&ht be petitlnentto Its rinahgtt, to ths Forty-nlnt$L%&3latum.- or twurse, this authority lnoluude* i7 iilglri- eatSctn ~an7pmwm leelly lnolaectalto the sapress poskra Pantloned. xe thlhk an iapllqd autkorlty la airen to th% ceaaoulttee to employ suok 8t%xio&raphle,.orother h6lp a5a &GSiGtGlltG, 88 Wl?Illa be M%%QMt#~lp l3%O%S%%S7 to the taking of %vla%sim~, end tbe.reportlagthe'oaai- slIttee* findings,but beyorla-taa thE~oGuEmltte% would. ' hate m authority or lee1 right *to tGlcQwith them a pnraon rho i% not a m%mb%r of either tha oodtt%e or the &%pi%la?4ir%and bestow apon h&z tlm mm% rig&a and privll%gGG* enjoyed by the emmlttee. 53 other w8rd0, this comalttee,as pointsd out In our original ,~opinion, uould hate no panr to de1efGtG any portion of its powers or kaposea &rtl&s‘uponsn]rother person. Phi% %n%wer la neotassarlly gesntel a% your ~.:inquiriessre g%lllsr%l. We are not.aaviwa or the 8~oif10 rti0t or f%at% &rlng.riae to your qa%%tlone, .. ;;at~myt, 0r aotzr~e, speak 4tih4rv1tss than in gemm- .