Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE A-l-l-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN j@. D. C. Greer Dear sir: We acknowledge reoelpt af yo upon the folkd.ng facttar filed with the Dopart- totallng 4226,432.&L tiy h86 dd88a the cmi8- sremmion ral&.+sesof osrtpln th8 above mmiint aggreg8tlag 00.00, vhlah he till sut’ren&r to e Departaent vlll.pay to the aon- th. diff~~~8 b4JtV*8n th6i tt.l88l mimalnlng uwelecrsed alelm, oondi- Deparhaant can pay ana the cantraator accept such paylrrent vlthout re~udioe to the right OS th63oontractor to presetcuteL m olalm agalmt the De- partluentfor aaaltlonal ooIAp8MatlQn, graving out of the oonstruction OS tlm projecrt,erd wlthmt pnjudiecr to the rights of the Dsparbwnt undm the oontraot to lnterpoce ang UeSenmem to Qua payment to muoh ~l.alm Beno~able D. c. meer, gage 2 whloh it nov has. The claim referred to is ID the approximate amount ot $590,000.00 Sor eddltlonal oom- peneation, filed by the contra&or upon ccmpletlon OS the pro&at. "In this oonnootlon you are referred to Section 33 Of the Contra& SpOifiWitiOn8, which reeds as SOI- lovat "'9~ or nbout the flrrt day of the iuonththe En&- neer vi11 ertiuste the valw of materlalr delivered et rite end vork done. Y1thS.nfifteen deya thereafter ninety per 08nt of the value thue detenelned 1888 PI%- tiow ?Rp8Pte shall be paid to the Contractor. "'When the emount8 80 re8erv.d rhall equal five per oeat of tke total OS the oontpaot pins the prob- able mount of any liquideted damages apparently ao- amaulated monthly estimates thereaSter vlll be paid in sull. The rohedule pa-teemto be emplajed In making partial payment8 8hall be determined W the Eaglnee~. "IIf &tring the progresr OS the vork it appear8 that the Contractor's bills for material* and labor are not being paid, the Oimer e&all have the right to vfth- hold Srcn8the Contrastor monthly papaents 8ufSfulaat 8~~8 to protett ItaelS sgsLa8t ell lon8es SroanpQa8ible lz$i~bgz to 8pplp the oata 8~ to the payment of . Payseatr of monthly s*tlpster UFO agreed not to be aa admlr8ion by the Ovaer tht the work 18 a- or that it8 qwntity or qw.lity I8 cutisfactory, nor a releare of betaContrastor fron msponrlbllity in reapeat thereof, but 8wh release 8ball ooaur only with maal paymeat. @uotia the Cont*actQr fail to eon&et8 the work vithin the t3.m epeeilied, the Owner ahall not be ob- liged to make any payments on monthly or partial esti- 8mtes after the datee 8peolffea for oorapletlonwtll the Contractor r$all deliver to the I&n&.neerthe vrit- ten eaa*ent of the Cozxtreotor~8Bwety eovaring every suakipartial payment peraittfng *u&i ~ymenta to be ma& tithout aSSeating the validltb of th@ bond. "Wptm ooraplstlonof the QntlrQ work of the oma- treat and aooeptanoe thereof, in vAt3.q by the CRmer, Honorable D. 0. &em-, Page 3 k&b ranalder due the Contraotor shall be paid, vhich shall be the total cmtpensatlon less ~MVIQW payments. "'The total compensation shall be dete,zM.nedby the final aotual number OS 8OeOptable units classIfYed In the proposal and bid r-t the unft prices and lump prices bid, plus any allovanoe or added payments, less an.yamounts of liquidated damages OP other deductions. "Before the final ssyment is made, the Contractor shall ahov the Ovner satI*Saatory evlcbnoe that all Just liens, olslms aad d8manda OS his employees, and of par- tie* from uhcm msterIal* used in the eonatructlonof the vork may have been pumhared or procured, are Sully rat18SIedd,and that the struoture Is fully relsared from all such llena, claim and demands. "'The aoceptance by the Cantraotor of payment of the final estlmatr shall operate as and shall be a re- lease to the Owner, the Engi.neerand all agents thereoi, frcm all Olaims or llablllty ua&er tb# QontraOt for everythIng done or Suralmhed, either relating to the vork tlw uader the oontraot or Sor w aot or neglect of 8ald Dvner, Engineer, or any of their agents or em- ployees related to or Oonuected vith the Oontraot. "%Q paymeats, either partial or f-1, are to be redo for nny nmterla2.whioh is to be tued Sor Salswork 0~ #ant, but payment Is to be made only Sar materlalr uhloh are left permanemtly in the fltt.lshetl structure aad fom a part of It.! "The Hlghvay cQlmsis*1onhas e.spre**edits willlag- nose to pay to the aontzwtor thedlffexwnce bstussn the SInal esttnvte aud the unreleased Labor urd material- mom elalms, as requested by the ttQnt.motOr,if it Oaa be done vlthout prejudice to the rights of either party, as SbQV8 stated. "Will you please adviue me If, in your ~pinian, the Hlghvay Cml*sIon, under the above qwtsd eeetioa of the Coatract SwelfLeatiQns and vlthout prejudloe to the rlghta of either party to the uontraot, may pay to the aontractor the dlfSerenc8 betvesn the emount of mosey Cue the contraotor under the PInal eatlmate eMx the labor fIon@rableD. C. Qreer, Page 4 materirlmerm claims rema- unpeld and urmelea8ed. Also, will you plee8e advi8e me if It till be neoee- aory to obtain the aomant. of the contractor13 sure- ty to any much arrangement if, in your opinion, it OaA be made.” %‘heoontraat in question WAS sxeouted unber authority of Houee i-3111 9. Forty-third Leginleture of Texao, Fourth Celled sesuicm, Chnpter 32, Page 78. said bLl1 agsc%flaally authorize8 the St&e Highway Commlrsion to &wisp, supervire sad aarutruat m to oontraot for the derigning, 8UperV18ioIiand the COA8tE'Ua- tlan of suah bridge8 and the approaeher thereta. It 18 fUl%~UAttsl that til hW8 lfhbh 8Ub818t at t&O tlae and plaoe of the maw of a aontract and where it Ls to be periarwd, enter into and forn 6 part of it, a8 if they oera expre88ly referred to or incorporated in its temao. Winder Brothem vs. Sterling et al, 12 S. W. (2d) 127. A8 noted in JOSW l%QllWt, 01&l iA the 8M) Of $2Z!6,432.- gibave been fil~vitht~~~~DepartPrent~~lnst the oontrao- . Artlole 5160, 8Upm. a8 ameuadadby tb Forty-first tigi8b- ttwe, page 481, Chapter 226, seation 1, pmouldes In part ~8 Sollovar 'Provided further that after completion and %a- ceptanoa af eo@leted project al;lMonet due eentrae- tar under mid oantraat aha= be hold by the State or it8 oouAti68 or 8ohuol dkstrfotll OF other mibdl- ri8lon8 thereof or any maalolpallty unt1.leueh a time that aat%efeetarj eoldmoe 16 sukultted and affldavita m&e by the contraotor that all just billa for labor and material wader th&8 aontraot ha8 b8eA paid ln full by the aomtraotor." In the ease of Republic RatLoml l32uikaad Trust Company V8. I&b8Sr. 8. & IAS. CO., 68 Fed. (2d) 448, the Clmult Court of Appeals, speaking through Justiae SSbley# in dZsaussiag 8aid Arti- ale 5160, saldr *The Act Of 1929 + * l 8melidedthe bond etatuts md dealt only vlth the final paymnt, requlrin& it to be vlthheld Abt in part to ooveg any porttoular claln, but eAtire until 8 raquired affidavit la nab.' Artlale 66741x,supm, pmvfdas In part $6 follovs~ ganozlsbleD. C. Qmer, Page 5 'And fipsl mgaQnt&Un AOtbeaadb until it la of money dw for sag labor, 8hOVn that all 81a118 wtiFial8 or Oquip?iOAtfUrA%.rhedfor the pUrpo8e Of such iarprovement8made under Amy suoh w&root have been paid." Ill the W8Q Of wb8tOA t WOrka V8. &JAM~ 57 3. x. (2d) 258, the aowt held that Artlele 5160 and Artlule &67&n vere in par1 materio. 'PhQeffeot of tba8e statute8, themfam, i8 that U~OA the aompletlon and acoeptanoe of a pub110 work woh a8 highway OP br5dge OaAstrUctioA, the f-1 payment dw tha crontraatorfor mob vowk 8hal.l not be made until lfflda vit8 and other 8ati8faa- tory proof 18 made by the oontreutor that all Obipr8 have bWA p*ia* !l%e vriter ha8 been lnSoxwed by the State IUghway Depart- wnt that on %ovembsr 23, 1939, the aontraator wa8 notified Jm aitlng, a8 provided in the aontraet, that the projeot had been oompleted and wae thereby aaaepted. YOU are thOrOfOlr8adV180d that it i8 the OpiAbbA Of thi8 department that the State %t.ghvsyCCQIU~~SI~OA irrnot authoF~6ed to pay ovor to the oontractor the tllfforenoebetween the emaunt due and the FwalAhg lanreloa8od alalm. IA vi4811 0r our an8ver a8 above 8fA@d, it 18 not w008- mwy for ,us: to tmmfer your qwstiw a8 to whether or not it la AaaaraarJ.~toobtain the aaAs:en~t af the aoAtroetQr’8 8urety mdor any 8wh arrangemeat. YQum veFy truly