Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF TNE ATYORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN honorable D. C. Greer State Highway Engineer Austin, Texaco Deer Sir: We aokuowlebgs 31, 1941, In whlah you prrtnsnt upon the tion of the project ana requested the !1ig,;;S*~ Depeirtment to assume the coqlatlon In any minner it saw fit, as Is orovlded by the oontraot sgecl- flcations. Luring the conference, the Aondlng Company repreeentatlve bequested that he be DEr- Honorable b. C. Grew, Page 2 Bitted to seoure lnfomal bl&dr fr o ml number of ooatrdotor8 theretofore appmrd by the Iii&a- way Dspartasnt for the oompfetloa of the pro- Jeot, wlth the understandlog that the Xlghwy Departoent would enter lnto agreement with the lowest blddrr for the oompletlorr of the proJsot as orlglnally planned. Under thlr plan, the contrsotor, whose bid may be seleoted for the oomplrtlon at the projsot, would furnish bond ln the amount of hie bid. a. . . . Proolalon tar the submlsrlon to oompetltlve bids of all oontraotr proposed to bA madoby the 6tate Riqhway Cepartaent 1s nade in hrtiole 6674h, Vernonca Revisad Civil statutes of Texas. Artlole 68743, red&s as tollorsi *The suooessful bldler or bidders shall enter Into writton oontrsota wltb eald depart- . msnt, and shall lV3 bond la such amount as la now provided b;t !Iax, oonditlonsd tor the. falth- ful oozplisnoe with hle bid and performnor of the contract and payable to the State alghway Departiant for the use and benefit ot the State IiIghra;r Fund.’ Item 8.7 of tine oontraot apsolfleatlons provldee trat in the event ot abanSonnent of work or default of the 2ontraot by the oontraotor thrt the State Highway Departsent 6%~ ta’re over ths proseoutlon of work, appropriate or use any or all material and equipmant on the ground as msy be sulta- ble, and enter lnto an agrsersnt for the oorrlJ~etion of the contract aocordlng to the terra sad wovlslons thereof or usa such other .methods as In the oglnlon of the Sn+ne& may be required for the oou@etion of the contract In aoce?tabls smnner. Analysis of the lnatsnt situation reveals that ths contra& ~$8 orIglnsllp let end entered into Un.ter tk8 au- thority of and In oompllscce with the ap?licsble stiitutory I)?( rLsions, bond in the mount of tks contract being furnlshs3 bJ the &erican &main3 Company. Althou:L the contrsctor haa a~faulted the State Is P~lly proteoted by the ‘bon3 and F!imorablO D. C. Grwr, Paqe 3 thare 1s ao ooaaaIon for the suboIsslon OS aoapetltlve bide as rsqulred under hrtlale 6674h, supra, bsfore arrangersnts are entared Into for the ooapletlon of the projeot. The Hlqhnejy Department Is authorlted by ftem 6;7 05 the oontraot opcolf~catlans to assuas comoletlon o? the oontraot In what- ever mnnsr is oaosptsble un3rr the oxlstlng olrowastanoes. No contrary provlsloa a?psars in the statutes and no method of procedure Is Were eug;Jeete& Artlala 66?4h hsvlng al- ready been oola?lIed with end the ssftguards provided in that and the suoceedlng artloles having already been brought lnto exlstenoe them would appear to be no neceesIty for the re- subnleelon of oompetltIvs bids. It la, therefore, the opinion of this departmnt that the Highway Department may legally aocspt lnforaal bids taken from qusllfled and apCuW@d oontreotora by the bond- lnz ooznpany wlthout advertising for such bids as provided by Artlole 667411 and enter Into agreeaent with the low bidder ror tha cowletlon of the Lea1 contraot. We note that this procedure was requested and lnstlqsted by tS% bonding congany, and ve sqgest that the racpeat bs redwed ta wrltlng, and tlaf all subsequent tranerotlons be refleot%d by urltten In- strum9nts. The apglIoatIon of tbls oglnlon, of course, 1s llnlted to the s~eolflo faot elt~atlon presented In your lettsr. foure very truly . .-.m- ATTOXNZY ,GEIlEtAL02’ TE;%AS , RC:Lx’