Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. . OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUETIN . c Honorable Joe C. Gladnay Criminal Dirtriot Attorney Eenclerstin, Texao nvictea of !dsae- 6 provhted In Artl- a micls 794, coas 1 Pf'00Oau0, 0n aaa, brldg26 and 110 work8 of the na rslstsa quest i0m wrb of the County, would it be nec- essary for the County to establish b County fara or a County mrt’ house? “2, If the Comtissioners Cmrt, by proper oraer’, ussa such labor then would it be . 2S5 Ho,!xorable roe c. c3Laan9y, Pa@ 3 namlatory on the Court to pay to the Officers the fees am provided in Art lCl5 C.C.P., since all Orticers in Rusk County era cozpen~ at ed on a salary, eDa r&at yrsvioion is mle for the ~apien* by the Court of the fine? m3. Rusk County !ms a population of 51,008. Howover) lt is zy uodsrstatiding that * all the etatutm Providin:! for paying oixvicte who work in ais0hargO of their fires have bceu hold unaon:~:titutlonal whore It has bean atteznpted to allow thez less than $3.00 a Oay. AZ I rlcht in this snd is &.oC a day the least amount ttit oould be allowed ouch ldor? -4. Ii the fine an6 coat assessed ie less than $30.00 an6 the &.G-azaa,:t i:zrks Sum6 out, kq0da ix hare tt Yci1’~ ten daga? ‘Ati 794, Cd.P., pXOVia35 th!It 3 c&~SiOn- er8 Court n;ap provide for a w0rk house ma the astabllshxent of a Couhty fvrm in connection therewith. aeetfon s 0r~ said A* provide8 Wiey shall be put to labor upon pablio roads, bridges ana other publio worko OS the County &en their labor oannot be utilized in the County v-or’s house or County famP. The oonetmotior the writer places on ,that statute i8 that bQiore OoCVittts oan be 2bOOa upon Public roads, brtages or other publie norire uf the Courty there must be in exlstanoe a County work house and County ra+ and, ther*fo.;.(:, ,%he first quostioc should be answered in %he negative. *In answer to question Number 3 it is the opinloci c:’ the wltsr that since all 3ilflosr6 in RUSK County are $iala a salary that it would not be r;eoassary for the County to :ay the fees alloweC by law tc the various officers as it v:ould -erely be transferrIng the JZCG~ ircm one IIocorablQ Joe C; Gladney, Page 3 fund to another. Art 1055 C.0.p :‘rovldes the TVthe County shall te liable fii o&Q-haIf of the feea of the Ofricers of the couhty vihe.-. the defandant falls to pay his fine or $0~8 it out in @$I Or works it out but makes no ~rovislor. for the ;oyz+nt of the Sine. Therefcre, it S8 the oglnlon of this writer +.!I&$ thr, CCU&~ ??cUll rot be liable for the f.i?Q :ihcre it hed utilized the labor cf a p3rso:! cwlnz the oc.r:e. *Ir. artwar to qmstlon &unbar 3 it ie zy opinion t&t Art 793 O.C.?,, controlls and that $3.00 a Uay is t.he cno*unt to be al- 1med.e Artlclm773 and 7.24, Vernonls .Lmot&sd Code of Grinlaal ?roQQdu-“Q, read PS fc?llows: . “Art. 793. Pher A Uefoudant is aonviot- ed cd a rds4ereertr F+nsl3s ;usls.hmnt 1s as- seaeed at e -peccslary fine, if he is uaabls to pay tke rlne end Costa edjudged a&net hl?n, hs may for such tlnQ es all.1 satisfy the judg- zent bQ gut tc work in the workhouse, or on the county farx, or :iubllc tiproveEeant8 of the oounty, a3 provided in the sucoeediry article, or if theve ho no suoh v~orkhouse, fann or tapm3xs~~ k.3 nh~.:J. be lmprlscncd in jail for a su?flci& Icagth of time to disaharge t.he 1~12 erou.?t of fi;.Q arid costs adjudged q,aSnrt tici; rstlrf fiucb labor or ~f.rv.~rlaonment ttt thme dzll-.vr for esch day thereof. “Art. w?a, vhere tbQ punishment aseeesQd lr, a convlotioa for ~lede:~Qanor 1s confinev~ent in jail for -core than mQ 3ay, or where in euob ao~vlct~ioo the ~uhleb~nent is assessed srly zt a .>9oziaq fine and the serty so con- victed 16 umble to r\ey the fine and acsts adjudged a.@nst hla, those so oonvicted shall ho re~;;_ulrsU tc Ur ;ts;~unl labor in azoordsnoc ..4th the ?rovislsns of this artiale under the fallowing r”-7 -.- >a rxd rspl? tions; 2sw Honorable Joe C. Glatiep, Page 4 “1. ;Sach aomis8ioner.s court may provide for the erection of a workhou’+e znd the astab- lis;lmedt of a county far3 lc connection thare- :rlth for the gurqoss of utillzin+s the labor of said part&e q oonvloted. UZ. 9uoh ;cmaa and workhouses shall be under .the control and .-.anagzent of the oom- alsslonsrs cmrt, :ind said aourt tiy adopt suoh rules and rogulstloor rot lnaonaistsnt with the laws as they deem necessary for the auc- csestul .zzna~enent and operation of said ln- stitutlcns and for effeotlvely utilizing said 'lobor. “3. Suah ove~rseers and Zc:rds mep be em- ployed under the authority cf tke oomaissicnera court aa my be neceeaary to prevent escapes and -to enforce smh labor, snd they shall bs paid cut of the county treesury such co~~enas- tiG& a8 s&ibidcourt my prescribe. W. l’kose so aorvlcted shall be SO gxsrd- sd while at work es to prevent escepa. G. They shall be gut to labor upon the public roads, Cridgam or other publio works of t!m county w3sn their labor cannot be utilized in the county workhouaa or county farm. 93. They shall be required to labor not l&e than o%gbt got zero :hnn taz houra each day, Sundays exo apt ed . No person shall fiver be rep;ircd to work for zore than one par, “7. Cne who refuses to lebor or is other- wise refraotory or ineu3ordlnate Amy be pm- lshed by solitary oonflra%ert OILbread end water or In euch other ‘:&nner ~8 the coznis- sl::~neru c2urt my direct. “8. ;~~a~ root -.t lti;3or they :zay be confined in jail or t:le wor?house, no my be most OOC- venient, or .:‘a tha :-:3&attorua of thn ComilS- sic-cers court xay preeoribe,. 2S8 Honorable SOS C. Cladmy, Papat;@ 3 "9. A fezale shall in nz aase be required to do -?@nual labor exaept in the workhouee. “10. Ons ..ha from a:e disease, or other physical or zmta& dlsabilltg is unable to do manual labor shnll not bs req~lred to work, ::ut shall rmain In jail until hls tern of iz- ?risoment is ended, or until the fine end costs adjudged a<;ainst him are disahargod accordlnc to law. I?!ie inability to do mumal labor lcay be detamined by a phpoicfan appointed for. that purpose by ths county udcq or the ccmm~ssicnsrs court, who shall be pa i d for suoh asrvios suah coqmsatlon as said oourt nay allow. “11. Cm oonvlc+ ed of a zlsdemamr whose :m&mnt either in whole vr in part is ls- @son;;ent in jail my. avoid roamal lcbor by gapant into the county treasury of one dol- lar for esah day of the tern of his imprison- n--nt, and the rocei;t of the oounty treasurer to that efreot shall be sufficient autboritg for the sheriff to detain him in jail without labor.” Sktion 3 of Article 39120 reads as followst “IO all oa.888 where the Comlseionays* court shall have detamined that county ofii- hers or preolnot orricers in suoh oouaty shall be oom~nnsoted for their servlom by the payment of an annual sslmy, neither the State at Texas nor any county shall be oherg- ed with or pay to any of the offloera so compensated, any fee or oo.mnlsslon Comic- siui6rs' Ccurt 532v or07100 for t!i.s creation of 3 ror!s- house and tha emiishzht of E oouaty far% in conneo- tion thcrcwlth for the Quc~osc of utilizing tha labor of said -x&ice so oonvloted.” 3eotlon !i of said &%icle prorillss; Thsy chall bs 9?tt to Lo.bor upoil zhe :utlla roads, brld~cc or other p&lie workc of %h:i, SsUty -&an their labor oanzot; be utilized in the oo,mZy workiiouoe or county fsrm.* Baotlcn 1, above quoted, La mt aaada- tory, e.Ld it is rltL;r~ the disomtior. of the Comlcsioners* Court whether or Got they ~!rCwid@ for th6 6r4CtiCU of a workhouse ccd the csti~blich.~.ont of c oaunty fcrm. Seo- zLoa 5 ;;rorldcc t&t when the labor of the county convicts ozniist be UtiLiZed 1,~ ::hc county workhouse or aounty farm, the:7 still be >ut to labor u>m the public XWIS, bridges 02 ether public aoris ir, :ne co-ar.ty. It. is also to be ilotyd tbt A~I-ti~l4 753, Cr?de of Crlt.Lmi ;.roc:cdurc, S~SC~- fichily ;]~ovideg t:t*t v.licz Y- dniendant is convicted of a ~mis'd.asaazos acd 21.8 pWis~ie;:t~ is assevaed Lt 8 ::eounicry Honorable Joe C. Gladney, Fags 7 fina if he .le unable to say the fine and costs adjudged c;tiJnet hi? he %ay for suoh tIma as will satiefy the judfss cant be put to work In the workbouae, or the county farq or (1. publlo imprcvozent of ths aounty 58 provided in the auoooadlng zrtiolbs; tThersforo, your firat quuestion ie respeotfullp anewsrod in ths nagativs. -krtIcla 1055, Code of Ctriml~al Prooedure, reads as lolloweq *The oounty shall r;ct be llahlr to the officsr and witness having oostr in a misde- moanor oaao ti14re defandant gay8 hi8 fine and costs. The county ehall be liable for one- half of the ieee of the officers 0f the Court, when the defendant fails to pay hle fine and b3ya hi.9 fine out in the county Jo11 or discharges the tmfi4 by means of working suth fiza Gut on t.& county roads or on any county ;roJeotr ha to :;ap such kalf of oosts, the county Clark shall issus hi.8 warrant ori the county Treasurer In favor or such offfcer tc bs pcld out zf tha Road and Zrldga Fund or othaz funds not othorwias approprfatod.” Con4idOring Artiols 1055, supra and i%otIon 3 of Article 391&b, eupra, the CommLssIoncrs~ 6ourt is ilot author- ized to pay the oiflosra who are cozpensetad on an annual salcry baeie the cozpensstlon provided bJr Article lb55. There Is nc provision whatever authorizlr@ the county to pay *ho fine of a fi.e,tandan$ who aatioiiss the fine azd costs asasased against him ‘zy working in the .workbouae or OS the county farm or pub110 ingrovaments or thu aounty or where the defendant ie imprisoned In jail for a sufficient langth of tI-,o to disoharga the full amount of the fine and costs sdjudcfed agaInat htm. In an8we.r to your third question, it is Our opin- ion that Utfols 793, Cod4 of Criminal Prooedure, controls and that $3.00 per day is the amount to be allowed. With reterencs to g2ur fourth question, ~4 Call ycur attention to the aase 9.x carts Young, 135 9. V. ted) 863. R4f4rring to ArtIole 795, Code or CrIfiIcal Procedure, the court saldr Honorable Joe C. Gladnoy, Pago 8 TV4 are Impressed with ths Ids& that such article is a general 0114, and applies ‘to cny ahd all miiisderreanora gensrally, un- lass there should oppaer in such Code E mro OFuCifiC on4 dealing with some subjsot there- In. In our ssa'rch tharsfor we cam In con- tact vrith Art. 920, C. C. P., under tha head- ing of ‘Judzent & Juetlo t Ccurt, * hiah is263 aa tallows; *vi derenlont plaoed In jail on aooount of iallure to pay ths tine and ooats coil be diachirgsd, on habeae aOrFU0 by ehowIngr “‘1. Thiit ho Is too poor to pay the fise and oosta, and “‘2, Th?t ha has r4maIned In Jail G 4urricmt 14nGth or -Sin4 to 44tft3ry t39 fin4 sAd c5sts, at. the rz te cf thres dollero fcr sach Cay. “‘Put th4 defendant shall, In no cass undor thlz erticle, be diachargsd until he ha8 boon imprisoned at loa6t ten days1 4nd a Justioe of the pooce l~ilg dIsohar5e th4 du- fandent upon his showing ths same cause, by aPplIoetian to such jU4t84O; and when such application Is Grr_nted, the Justice shall noto th4 nam on l-do docket..* “It la our holding that Artlele QEO, oupre, prevents tha dlsaharge of any person by maans or a writ of habeas oorpus who Is compelled to lay out his fine end oosts In jnil, which was li-vied in. a justice ar,uxt, until he haa rrerveC at least tnn days in jail. At such tlms he is entitled to the writ of habaan oorpus, rnh shall be allowed the sum of three dollars per Uny for each day he co- zaimd in Jail, and If suoh amount would have dloohsrgtd th4 fics and costs, he vsuld 54 ontitled to hie dIechar&e 05 a habaae oor?us ~;esring~ sx part4 Yol;lughlIn, 124 vex. Cr. 3. 40, 50 5. :;‘. 2d 705; XX carte Honorable Joe C. Dladney, Page 9 Fsrnandez 122 Tex. Cr. R. 641, 37 3. 3’. 26 578.' Fhi i e this holding may operate as a see~mlhg injustice to the reletor herein, oom- pelllng h&to serve ten days in jail for a ;'14 fine, its c$vreotion la a matter for the legielature rather than this court. The datuts is plain and we must follow it. '578 thsrefore hold Iierein that relator woul!e have to either ;sy his fine snd oosts in the justloe court, or serve at least ten days in jail before being entitled to his disoharge herein by means of a writ of habeas cor;ua.* In view ~of.what has been snid in the above mention- ed case, we respectfully ansc’er your fourth qusstion in the afflmative, when the oonvlotion Is obtained in a justios acurt.. However, when the conviction; is obtalmid in a county oourt, the question is answared in the negative. Trusting thet the foregoing fully mowers your inquiry, we are Tours very truly Ar&ell lilliams ATT;)c:PIZYGENERAL Assistant