Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEiAS AUSTIN ifonorble icalh 1. l3ud.l Chiet of Cert‘p flaate OS Title Dlvlubn Dqsartmt of Publia Gaf’ety .T’. , cwip %abry ‘\ NlMAll, TWA8 h6r six: rtwnt krur CIrElfla*te on by the t&et li&n eationIB aoo~aaled by rtt wrtLfyln& that tw IIha* bwa regomesae4 ao- o? the eoatraot betwea e ~mrtt(DItjpr even thorrs,h than be a awend lbm agaiu&8 & vshitis. *((L) Gkould the Deparoleentrcrwlre a re- Aewe algned by the reeoa& l&errBsldw, er ir th6 tmidavic of r6powei0omi oertitxra to by tb first 116s holder SutiicrZIJIcavldonw to jurtify the 18*utanoeof t&6 Pitls. 857 “(b) ibat lnlorrnation ahould thlsis De- &ksrt&?ultre;ruirr under 8UOh a sltution before we imy fsrruea Certtfioate~o~ Title to the holder of the oar under reportmxslon.w In your firet queutlon you rap0ooaoerned with the type of infor~tlon whioh should be reqzlred by your Dopartnmnt rmrn a applleant who hae puroheamd a motor ve- hlole at t3judicial foreclosure sale barore you issw a aertlrieate in the nase or said puraheser. Tour attmtlon fa oellad to hotion 33 of the CertLt1oet.tof Tlt;lo&et whiah has been lnoorporated Into Vornon*s Xwototed Penal Code a8 irtlole 14364.. "sec. a&i. #'heneverthe ovmsrahip ot a mtor vohlale rogllrtersdor lloeased with- ln this State ie transferred by operation of law, as upon inhsrftaace, dalee or be- quest, hankruptep, rsoslv8rahlp jtadlciail sale, or allyothw lavoluntary &mlzu 0r ouwrahlp, the Departaeat shku tiarrua a new oertlriovlte of title upon being provided rrlthcertltied wpy or the probate pr0043ea- inge, if say (U a0 adminlrtratlolaia neu- wafmry, than upan arribilrlt shssiag au& fuot and all of the heirs rt lau and rpeol- flo&lon by the heir8 as to la whoas nam the oertltlaate shall iabuaf, or order, or bill of aale fraiz the ofiloer rmakln&the judlcli~lsale, exoept hmeiver, that where foraalomre lo had uader tbr term of a Slen, the attidavlt ot the gemon, flna, aszsoaletlon,or oorparatics or authorl%ed aGent, of the fact of reyosaeeslon enb dlvestlturo of tltle in awordume withthe terrs of the lien, shall be auitlaiegtto authorizethe lseuanue OS a new cerki.U.eate or title in the ntuneof the puraherer at suoh eale, cindsxoept further that in the oaas 0r the foreclosure of any Canetltutlonal or Statutory lima, tha aifldavit OS the holder or YUO~ Uen, or it a crorporation, its *tint, oifthe act 0t tbc tmatLoa 0r ouch lien :m& ths dlveotltura at title by matson these& 5.neccordanaa with law, .~hsll be etU'ficlsntto authorize thn lasurrnceof a new osrtlfioats of title U the ~~JISUef the purohaaer." In the above QUOted ertfoin ths Luglnlatum hu ryeai?loallg provfded thet your Department q iesae e CartlflicateOS Title In the 0-e OS the purohfieerat Y judicial forealoare sale uipon~esentutlon or the bU+l of sale from the of?laormklngtht4 judlclfil8ale. In this amneotlcua you am alno advired thet the purchiielrr at th Soreclomure sala, it suoh foreolcrure wan o? the ilrst and prior lien a&abut aaid Inrtorvehlole, taken title to the ame free of all aubaoqurnt liem whloh previouely existed prior to said sale egafxut said motor vehlole. That a foreeloaure sale bee euoh stfwt la the well e8tabllehe4 rule o? law of the eourta of this State. The Ccm-i.~loa of kppea1.sin the ease o? Sabine Uotor Com- p&uy v. $. c. zugilrh rut0 wrb#euy; 291 3.g. 1086, etated as P0llowa: 0* I I St goes without stqlng thrt a woper aotion in oourt cuts 0rr*tp,,~ftit3or the sxmtgagar or hla ass&w. In answer to your flxist question, therefore, you are eclrfeedthat when the bill Cat rala of the offinir r&U- in& the motor vehiole rt the foreolomre 061s irr?unsLshed your Department as regulnd b$ Beetian 35 of the Certiiloate of Title irctyou are alrtborisedto ieaue a Certi?laata o? Title ln the narPro? the purehanr at the ?oreo&mtg& sale without noting thereon any of'the Uene wbiahwcrs eeoord to the lie,nwhlah me ?oreolo6ed iat ha ootut aotloa In your mooad question pu are oenoenmd with a situation where the'mortg8&ee reposoe6m~s Q oar under tlia 8x~eias temfs or the mmtgage vilthmt reoouTamto’ jgd~oial prosedun. are uaeuthorlued to In euah a sltwtlon ~0'0~ leaue u new Certif'ioarte ot Title in the bdl~ul af the nkopt- gag- beoalue mid mortgage by sare repoastssioz~ o? fbr motor vehlole doea not auguire title to the sanm. It Ii a ,~ll eettled luw of thi8 Stat8 that prior to mpo5ses810n the mortmgoor has title to the sortmed property. As stated by the Corrpnfealon of ~~pepla irrthe OZISOof Gablncs Wtos Cola- pany .v. ;i’.c. fin&s& kuto Cemmny, augra, *In Texas, the la@ title to mxtgqed property rwdw In the mart&a&ax.* St i8 also u well aettlod rule of lo* inthLrs St&e that wheathe mrtga2ee re~aseaeee @opmrfy he bolde the Babe be mortgagee and Pot (~a ounef. The @t&prei~Court 3.8~ Terraain 859 the caee of Barling Y. Creaoh, al S.S. 337, stated as fol- lovte : n* t . ohs lnstrunante being ahattel xartgaam, t’hevendor had the rights of a ~~~@gtte under a ahsttel ~rort&ageoontaln- in& the stlpulatlons or right to take POfBSe8- slon, uhloh would ba to take powss88ton of the proyerty it he da&aid hlmself insecure, or the debt aot being paid, and to hold or dlspose of the proserty La the aharaoter of aortg4sDPgoe. ulldsot k&sovaer. * * +* (mlder- sooringioura. I The lan&iage of the Eiarlingaam, aupra, wee aogied intc~the opinion OP the Su~eae court of the &ate ot Texa6 ia the ease or sin&m ivg. co. '1.Rio%, 71 S&G. 275. Thla lina 0r authority was reaiflrrtsdby tha COJIU&+ don of ~ppeale in the Sablna w&or Comar~r ease, eupra, aoL the Court atate& UI)followa: *+ * * But, Eden titer saoh e ~rnkmre~ it would have beon neoesecuy to handle ~tbb onra 88 nrortgagees and 8Qt a6 QvJmFS, until the title h&d passedd,either under ~?meolooure or in aooord with the parer of aale ooatained~. in the awrtgage. * * ** T&m above Gtwted rule wa6 amI.8 aaaouneed inthe on80 0r -;&da t. Bowera, e;LS.W. (2-d)590. The Court stated ae rob .* “A mortgagee la not satitZsd to aat a8 the om8r of propcrrtyIn Its di*imsltiaa, but must aat aaoarding to tb parer0 given in the siartgeae. * * * aI& tb asart*gee baa 110 right to take ;looeeraloa of tha gmop- ertp na hla OWIZand ~pgraprlrrteit.” On Ghe other hand, tha Court8 at this State have long rsoognlsed rhe foreolosure OS iilien by repossession and sale aab private sale under the t ema of the aortgmget Chief Jwtioe &inoe In the Singer IQcg.Co, aaee, suwa, rtat- ea as rollaws, ln this oonnsation: “ee are or the epialar that c ha qtmsticm 860 should be aaswred la the aftirmtlva. Clear- ly, unless the sti$u&tIon la t&e mrtgotga, whloh surparted ta give to appellantthe right to take poevewloa of the aerring Ipaohine upon default or piryaentbe h8lQ cf m &feat, U..to agent oomitted ao won& by u pmoeable seicare zzb;h8 proparty ror the4pumas0 of payiag the 0tipdati04i fo v8ua tw8r8 it ti . ‘ii38 oontrpry to pub110 polloy. ’ l * Tin pro- goeItIoa that auch a otiyuLation la vdia, and that th martguges mag take peaceable pos- session of the grope&J wit bout the ooaneat, and even cmerthe~ prote8t, of the amtgtagor, la staotainadby the great weight of authority. * * am In thn above guotcrdoa8e, the Su~~em Court was urrlrming a aIm&u holding 0r aaid court In the oaam or lit~llngI. Cfeeoh, oupra. The TetrakmiaCourt of Oiril Appea]r reatilraed the ValIAIty of maah B g~~vlsioa Ia a mortgage 1nthe aase 0r Jetme Frsnoh Mniw k Grgn Co. v. Zlli~tt, 166 a.%. 20. The Court state6 ae follo*e: “3~ th4 teras 0r tha mortgage omexi8g the titan pianos, Elliott was authexiEe-4 te take poonesnloa thereof *uhwevex thy may or t%m be round, and uell the name at pxfvate or pub&lo aale to the hi&ant bidder,’ In t&o event ti5s Eopkiae rra6edefault in tha pay- --meator the debt it wuured, or in the avant, at any time beiare the ladobtadnes8 mtare&, zlllott *reit urisareor %numare.* It I8 The above quot.4 rule wud aSfrhwd by ths i3oaumant Court ai civil ~ppalsr in the OLIBBor Iuncik vutor co. t. uelia, 847 ki.*J;. aa. In thI3 aonaeotloa, tha Court state8 ae follow*: The trial.aoun erred la hi6 ooltstxua- tioa or tka mortga&e. The jWovlsIon& of the mortgage authorleln~ agpsllaatto seize MA WU ths truak at grlvate sale and wlth- out noties are mtvIolatlve of any At&tUt@ of this state, nor against the pdalla polisy oi this state, es expretwed In the, deaI~Ion~ of our ooilrte. It Is aald in Al C.J. 706: ?lThs inortgageltseli may diepease with notloo, as whom it prwldss thet the mort- gagee may 8d.l et private sole.* "Ths rule 18 anaouaasd as tollaus, In Jaw 011Chattel AWrtgages (6th &id*) 0 792: '?'fie paver or sele doer llotreq.alrs the gfvlng et any notiae oi the sale, the rrort&agee aun tmdcs a valid sale either at public or private snle, and need not &ire i3nynoti 0r it un.ha b O~OOW 89 t0 Q. &at OsTerthslrss ths s$l,d,,t,o bs bInding, avmt be a fair one.* The ralldlty of such a provlalon in a wtms wns also reafflnwl la th6 oy8es OS Piduty ilnlonFire Iwtua~oe co. 0. 35116w-sattexrleld co., 10 S.w. (34) 163, Court or Civil kppsals of Texas, kaarillo, ad the ease of CaSpb8ll v. aistexn See6 diOral8 Ccuupnn yr 109 S&i. (24) 997, court 0r Civil dppcrslaor nwiw. a8 imtoalo. You em (11~0 a4vIsecLthat unksss tha tsms or ths mortgage expressly prwlds far the earn, it ie aot aeoessary for nation to be glveu to seoond or subsequent lfen holders egfnst the 8ami prop8rty in a ouee of rorealtrsureby ths prior lien holdor at a private asis under the terms of ths mort@prge. See Campbell v. &stem %ed & oraln Coppcoy, supa, and X4mpehire v. Greffes, 143 G.B. 147, SUwem Court er Texas. It may be a&ad t&e& ssottio 38 of the Certltisato 0r Title hot rNwgnIeestkrs *auuty 02 8 roroawbuxe by 0 mortgagee by pxlvats sale w&&r the terms of ths arrrtgiags and Inthla sonnsatlonpmvidee as follows: N4 * * that where foreoloaws ls had uader the texts or a lken, ths aitkdavlt 02 thatpermn, firm, assoolWlon, Qp arperatlea or 4utbmlzed agsnt, vi t&s f&at vi r4pv6- 666SiVtI and diV46titlll.6Of title in 86vOrd- MO4 with tht t6l7ilSVft&# UM&, 6hal1b6 &uiiiCi8ltt to t!iUthOri60 the i86U6666 Of a %WW 06rtiiht6 Of titb a tbs nUW5 Or the ~UW&666X &it 6UCh 8d10, ' * *" YOU -0, thFdOr6, 6dVi66d that th4 abVV6 QUf3t.d &fit016 r6QUlte6 M atti&'it irOP th4 XiWt@&66 I#hVMD& the 6ti6 tUld6r the t6rPU Or th6, &QFt&+gS to 6 third party WhG iS &pjdying for & C6rtiflvat6 Of Tit16 iIlhi6 -PI. YGU 63-6 rlU%hW 6dVi66d that tk0 fhBrt6Mt -6% rtot t6QUir6 e re&as6 rigzled by the 6666n6 Ii66 hold6r olluie the s6aond 1%6n hQld6r'8 liell 4&lill6t t&6 m%vr V6hi616 uUd6r th6 OOII- struotionof th6 Court8 of tbia Statcr hao b66nout oft by the prfVltat6fOF6Q~OSlUZ6 6616. b6 @*rfoU6l~ 6trt4dl th6 CQlWt6 b&N6 h6ld that the ~~6ba66r at a judiOf& foS66~UE6 66&S aaqulrsd tit14 fr46 vf au ini6Xivr 1i6P6 a&d.tWtthe property, Th4 6&66 Zti6 hati b.Olh 6XteS&cd by tW CotA't8 Of thio St4t6 t0 fOr66l@MrO 66ti6whi6bar6 piVat 64le8 Ord6 by th6 SU.U’t$&&W ptt6r i6&?068666iOR. Th6 3t2~6I66 CVutt 6f Texao lo the aP64 of E6mp6hlr6 v. Or66V68, ~UPP. 6t6t6d 6a tOlbW6, hl thi6 CQllh6~tiVIl~ “Ths OUltcurtiOrrOf ~lail!tltf’S 6OlUU6l Tao thQ 6freet th4t ‘t&e rlglat Qf xeaeapt~nn vi CL unior 1i6ahold6r is nQt cut dr by a. proab d9$6tow&ieBth6 Janiarllsabold6r ir not tt purtq is not ooond 06 w thla, and neat sugported by au%hority' 41* r6amn. Ttu a6 i6 thUiB t6WlY 6tSCOa in ihHL60 Oa ?&Wt- &a&66, I l&97: ‘9h6 JXlZOba6W (U&W ihO- albmre pzwudl.a~bymleum%erthr jwwmr &.VM in th0 TM&&&i&S) t&B* t&6 Wt&#i@+t"8 tit16 &lve&44 of all lnaumbr~ee8 1pa4e atno. the ar6aBion oi the p0lw6f.* Aad, aah, In th6 664m aaatl6n: ‘A 66x6 xe&pl6rly ereraia64 UJl6.T a &IO-l’ Ir, OqtiVahSt t0 66l’iOb f QP6- clo6un,.by B 6ourt of 6Qtitj PropaTlJl pIUW4d.'* Th6 Am&~@ COwt Of ab$l Applrab r64ffina*d this prQpV6itiGkl In the Fldrlity Elnion Fir6 ~UXX3U66 CQB- psa~ aa68, augxa, an4 stat64 a6 ra.m6at *Under the pewr oi sale in the mart- @@I, the fiuanqe Qol~~y had the ri@ht t0 t&kite pv4a466ion of the Oar W&d 6611 it with- lionoroSle ii&h L. Bwll, Bag;6 6 out nOtiC to mber ior the pUm666 OS &tying the id6bt6dO666 6&6&R6tth6 Cti, &Uld 6UCh 4 6614 V66t6 title in the ptWChU66r. %oak Amor Co. v. iiilelia (Tex. Cit. ~@p.) 247 3.X. 668; Orrhoer V. Tadr, 11 'Tax.Civ. xpp. Ire, 32 ii.%.373; slngatrsuing Maehi Cu. v. hiv6, 98 Tex. 174, 7L 3.W. 8'15,60 L.ii.a.143, 97 AR. St. R6p. 8011 f6Ue -Innah Piano Co. v. jstliott(Ter. Cit. Appp.)166 S. W. 29; Stat. Bxsbm56 Bank Y. Sd8h (Tax. Clv. A&Q.) 166 2.K. 666.. The rule was again 6tut6d. by th6 36awnt Court or Civil Appeal6 iu th6 Q&66 Of &tfabt ‘1. 86b6rt, 8% 8.pi. (2d) 929. The CvLWt 6tut6d a6 fO~666: "Th6 jU&Sl.Ut in taVQr Of 164r66Qtfl6 Trust Corporation ir afflrrasb. Ia t6kf.q pVU6U6iOii Of t&B PUtWbib it iOuOU6a literary the gOU6r6 6iVOai by it8 a5Ftae. Shi6 BsthVd Vr fOreOlolllU66rt~Ui6hed 6Q- pellan8*8 6666od lien. *bin6 Mittor Co. v. ‘A. C. kn&lsh &auto Co. tT6r. 0018. App.) 291 3.x. 1088." 81 WI&&’Oi 6-r. it i8 the O&&iM Or thf6 469 ~rtW.&t that kh6r6 6 S6t't&8~U N$bO6666666 6 awtOrV6hiO16 end 60116 th4 661~ at a prlv*ite 8ale, which pro66dPr6.26 in acaOrbanO4 mith thO.t6m Of th6 'afst&aBQ, YotW ~~ptU%RWt 16 authorized to fnws a $6rtlfbate of Title ia th6 n6m6 ot the purahaur at 6uCh priYit6 fclr66kWAE6 68& WI&ah Wrtiti- Oata, 8WJ Bat ZlGt4OE th6 46M6 tbs 666Qd Or ini6riCS Zi6lU WhiCh 6‘ii6t6d 6@iIi6t 66&d aotor VOhiOlO jWiQr t 0 t h6 t&O Oi lW~8666iQS 6ti fOf6a&6Pre Of th0 prior l.l6B. l-b6 &Jr inmreiatienthat rbarlldb6r6cyriT64 by ywr Departmtin auoh a aaae da ootlin66 under 23eetlon35 at the CertlCiart8 Qt Tit16 ACt icS 80 &ifidaV%t Ot tb@ U!@l-t&lg66 ObaUbQ Uttoh r6~0684OSiOn aab pdVat6 Sal0 Utld6l'thOt6W63 6f th6 IlOl-t&V3136. Moth- in thii5 Op$.XtiC#6kdi b0 OCXI6tnt6d 66 W- z;&I~ to 116n6 whiohWrr6, ~2?~@~t0 t&4 l&HI that W66 fra?6- . TQUU V6Ty frrnlf APPROVEDMAR 18, lg4' -%ccrc*LQ.&4 A~~cp,~~y GiBERAL 03 TEXAS 30:&S