Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

1. ‘.3 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Iion.G. k. Ihltere couiitgj;ttornsg San %SabaCounty San :klba,~ex.%ti Eon. S. A. l”altors, Key 25, 1939, %ge 2 in eaab case of intorventloni Or, &all tha oflicars receive any aCditloaa1 fees where there are pleas of intervention? "Air8 aounty attorney tiling them suit8, ee I uaderstandit, 1 em entitled to not mre then ten percent acmraiasiona for the amount of Judgment In favor Or int4rvenom taxed aa pert or the ooats an4 mD8 should not b4 4ntitl4d to th4.ddfti&~.ao l8 attonlop'ar . orfntolToJll8g but the elo* andth48b rsf Mmuld k on&edto mmddb 'tlonal$&CC a&h for the laterwntlOa.- Xf .w bate oorrsatly lnteqmted your laqw, the qusatlon aubmltto4 is a8 above ltated. "I%0 cot8&tyor Rl8trMt AttorEoy 8hel.l in ti Otlit8 "EbtoMfi~ 8U%t8fOrth4X'44W427 Of dellnqwst t4x44 fat uby y4aP, 80@08 ahsll bo glveu to the wrmr or awawr8 ai said propsrtf88 iSp~~bbdr~~fn&ti~um~. ot the Revised Civil 8tatute8 of TOXM, l%M, OS VatelldOd by ChZIpt~ 119, P4@3 196, 3x8$8Of the Fety-Seaond Logblature, Regular SMSlOu~ Tb0 i~4~,h8r4inprwa4d ior am not ~oom4 to uor shsll the verlous off'laershsnln a8nmd be entitled thsrato in any atit .u.nleieli~lt be proved that notlae has been given to the aner fba the time and is the mannor provided by . lion. c. A. Yaltern, Xay 25, 1932, Pa,ge3 "In all cases, the oaepensatlonor said Attorney shall be Fwa (&.OO) Dollars for the first traot en& One (#l.aO) Dollar for eedh aCditlona1tmat up to four (41, but said fee In no aase to exceed NYS ($5.00) Dollars. And provided,that In any suit brought agalnat any individual or oarporete tnrnar,all paat due tsxes for all previous years on suah tract or tracts shallbe lmluded;and praridwl, further that tier4 there 4r4 semral1Ot8 ln the 84~14 abd~tloa or 8ub4ivision delinquent, bs1ongiaetO'tha 8U8C!Ull4r,au.saidd4%+ : $W~blOtUt”hu ho made th8 8obj4Ot Of 4 . "Allf~1lpxwlde4toctheoffl~orahore in6h~b4tT44t46Ui488OfOff%044&&~ eamt4a for u mob, mb scrid-~offlaors 8hall not reaelve am rot&a uld t 448 id (1x!ftou .of the.- otmpmaatl@a allalod said offlom under the lu6offhlm SWze;,andpxwl#e4 fVSt.hOl- th@t t-h8 &tlEt~-At~* cr&bUl DlatrletAttmaey or Mstrlot Attornmy &ball notbaanMflo4totho f888 himaXngrov24ad '~ for ln lnntuwea wham amh dol$~quont tuu arooolloot86maore8xltmot8hetwwtho C&881--’ oomtand othm ror WA*oob leotlenai suohtuos,uaUlamaaWimtia&ooa the f448 heroin ~rovld8tkfOr woh effi00?8 #hall l&Of b0 4884884d UOF 04lbSfsb, RBe ShoruT or @m&able of ‘the Couu&y in*hiahth8 milt l0 padiag shdll~%Ofm~ farofTau()t,cKi)Dol&rnlnuohoMonbfoh ulll.oovar the 6orvlae or @ll pr44486, u&d %ehe~~ingOithepzqnu=tyaa~ exaOtztl~d44d~ us in w auah soit, $Fl-O44?JS.i8 ~lMu4d t: be i~erved3.nCoumtleB other the3 the one in uhloh the wit 1s peaMng, the Shsrifl Or Constable 84lWia(l the 8-4 &M.&t X444iT4 a if34 Of On4 (8t.00) MUM i.Xi 44Ch EUit f4X hz8 cierviaaa. The Dlstriat Clerk shelJ retoslw~a to4 Eon. (1. A. Yalters. Lky 25,1933, 1’age 4 of 7ko (32.00) Collars in full fcr hia ser. vices in eaah case. The County Clerk shall reaelve One ($1.00) Pollar in full for his servlaes In eaoh cam. *Pmvlaea, thnt the fees herein pk rided for ih aonneetlm tith.dellnquent tar 8uits Ohau. Oo88titUt4 the Only i448~ that shall be obfmgod by uala oiiloem Sor prepm%zg,til~,inrtltutlz& aadprOseaut- ins Wit8 OILdellnquah fusP Urd andall oolleotiouthereof, &W wlthsra-haw~rexmale& "xnoaso the d8~8qWnt teepsyer oholl pay to th0 ooll*ot8rth4 anot+ or a4l~qwnt tous for rhloh he 18 liable together with 400ru4a Int4r4st 4ft4xtb4 fh fOlW#d#WIt18t4k~@Mt thea, oaly one-hslfofthe foo8 taxable %a SWJh~ 4888, U prmib8dfOrh4Nittj 8mb8 o ha r glg e ad ia h o ia t m Art1018 1533 R8~ie& Civil Statutes, proridsrr that the tees aXLao & tha ofTlam lathe aboW qpbka art1010 "shallbe texti a8 eaeta a&mt the lanU to be sold uader +dgmwtfbr taxwra Bothof th488artiol484r4apartof Whapter 10, Title 128 oi the Revised 81~11 i3tatutesoi 1925,* refemd to in Duotlan W of &Male 7?54!5m, Vernoa*e Aanotetd Etatutea, hereinaitarquoted, ,. In M87, the Ie&slaturo~for the flr8t time spaoted a rather aamprehennlrestatute deflnlng "taring units' and authorizing suah units to intervene,if not impleaded,made 4 pnrty defendant, by another suoh unit whloh bad tiled suit ror d4llnquent taxes due it on ma1 pmperty on which, or a part thexeoi, the ispleaded or interveningunit also bed a delinquent. tax cbim. Eon. 0. x. l.alters, my 25, 1929, Page 5 Ctoptcr 806, ??e@.ur Elesc;ion,45th X.e&3lature,Arti- cle 7345b, i’crnon’s Annotated Zatutes, The pertinent sect&m of t!liaArticle are 1, 2, 6 and 13, whloh read, mcpoctlYely, us folkus: "Sec. 1. Por all purposes oi this Act, the tern *taxingunlts,t shell include the F.-tote of Texae or any town, city or county in said E+&ta, or any corporationor district. orcan%zedunder the laws of the Stats with authority ta lerg and collect taxas. "S&O. 6. In any henal’ter 6uit brought by or in behalf of any taxIn&unitas above- defined, for delinquenttaxes letled a@lnst property byw such taxing unit, the,plain- tlrf may ml-a aa parties d4rwm any or.all other taxln6 units haring a4mtqtua tax olaim8 agalnat au& prqnmt* or any part thersof,and it shallbs the dutyof eaahde- feadaittaxingunit,uponbolngrrer~ed ulth oltatlan es mrided b Law to appear in a&d aautseand flPb its Ql&l for dsliaquent tax66 agallult8u4h pn rty or any psrt therear. It &all b4 mUf rold wmrlae upon tlm St&e erlv5aesTeru,inaay4otmtyirrrut3lisultto64m oitatlonugkonth*Ckmat~TuCollootorah8rgd riththo autyof aox&ot5.ng au& a0mqu08kt taxes duetheStakaadaouatyagalnst 6uoh prqmrty and It ehmll be suffloient aervioe upon anyotbertulqg onit to .udrv*oltatlon upon the orBoer 0hampU with th4 duty or oolleotingthetaxtm of suoh taxlng unit or upan .th4Mayor, n-4~iate, or Ohainun~ or the goternlnt~ bodyof euohtuing tit, or upcmthei3eoretaryof 8uuhtaxingunlL Any taxing unit ha* any olairpror Uellnqwnnt tarea sgalaet euohpro~rtywywaive the ls- maan cud 44mics of altation upon It, "It shall be mandatory upon any such taxing unit so rlUng.suoh suit or suits, In all oases where all other taxing units are not lmyltadadto notify all such taxing units not so lqleaded of the filing of such !Ion.C. ii.'-alters, Xay 25, 1939, Page t3 8d.t Or SilitS, Mach nctice to be given by dopositlrq in the United Sates nail a m- ,@tored letter uddresmd to ~ucfitaxing unit or units @vinE ths nme or nam48 of t#baplctitisr rcrKi deferuknts,the court wkere filed, and a short Usscrlptionor the property involved in mid suit so that such taxing units not Impleadedmy ht~vethe oproFunltpto intervene RS herein provided. "330. 6. ti.1court f.?OStO, lnoludw omts Of 64rrirlgproa4ss, in Imy suit hem- attrr brought by or in bahals or any taxIrig 'UnItIsror dsiinquanttaxer inyhluh mlts all other taxlq unitshaving a delinquamt tarolaia!ega~tsuahpmperEyorwprrt theno?, hav4 been irplu4.4, together rlth all 4x$4ns4s of fomoloeura sale and snob masonable attorneylsfess as may be inourra4 bf the interplaadodor latarvanlqgtaring . ualta,not oxaaedin&tan psraent (lO$I of th4 anount sue4 for, suoh attorrtsf*8 fo48~ to be subjwt to tha lppWd Or the oopzrt to4etherrlth auah reaeonabla 4xp4ns46 M the taxing units uy lnour in pro4urlng 4&a %. and lnfonatloa a# to the name, 14entl~~ erd io0ati0n~ or n4448fum ,prrti44 and in -- proourlng nuiossa l@ d4soriptions of s *ha PTOQWQ', .sh3 b4 dar~eablh M oourt ao8ta. =s40. 15. or this dot Th4 provleloJl#l ahall be oPIPUIPt.lve of an4 in addition to all other rights as4 ramsdies to *lob aar taxing unit w be entltlod,but as to any proaeealngbrought unltsrthisAot, lr agy part or portioa or tlda Aat b,a~IIk oonfllot with any mrt or portion or any law of the state, thetexms and proYleions or this Aat shall govsrn as to suah proasedlng. The provisloneof Chapter 10, Title 122 of the Revised Civil Statutss or 1925 shall govern suits brought under this hot exaapt ao herein provided. Aota 1937, 45th Leg., p. 1494-a, oh. 500. fkn. G. X. t'slters, tky 35, 1939, Face 7 All cf the ahGve quoted sthtutes relate to the ccllcction of delinquent taxes by suit and/or Che fees to he slXomd certain oflicers for serviaes ren- dared in comectlcn therewith and mst be CODStNed toeether. hxtldle 7332 is an older statute then chicle 9345b, 'andIf in coafliotwith rection 6 themof must yield to the ymviblons of the latter. From theee &,a- tutes, we must get our cinswerta your queetlon. In er- tminlng thm, we oust keep in mind that it is the estab- llshed law ot this sthte that "an otfioer may not olaim or reaah any money without a law authorlelnghim to do so, and clearly firin the eaount to-whioh he ia axtlt- led.- 54 Tex. JUr. 511. In other norts, au ontloer map not alelm e r00 Sor a partloular service readered un$methe statute has preaaribed a tired fee for said Thib 1s the nale, wen though the fee or ea- pensat& fixed Ia unreasonableor Inadequate. An offi- oer may be required by law to perions speolfio senleee or dleahargeadditional dutiesSor whiah no eompanaatlonIS proridwL 54 Texex, Jur. pp. 550, 531. h&n, It haa been ape&loally held by our eourttsthat the rulea of law above annouuaed apply to ieee of officers In suits Sor the oolleotionof dellIn- quent.taxer,and that. rruahltatutee prescribingfee8 for pub110 oftioers are atrlat eon8tme&, and aglmt statw YS. state ; grcxmds, 38 5. u: (edI 1097, and auboritlem there sited. Artiale T332Is anuaually clear and unamblguoU6 statute pmsorlblng with oertalnty the exaot aount of foes eaoh or t&e OifioeM aamed therein may reo6IYe for the reepimtlvesenioes rendersd by eaoh In a suit brought . by the state of Texas, a "tarlag us&,* to Peeover dolti- quent taxes on real property, The orflasrs named ny now oolleat only the fee8 therein allowed, and under the eon- dltbns mused ?hereln, unless othemlae provldod ln Sac- tion 6 c& Article 7545b. be The aourt oosts provi,dedfor in SsotLon 6, loa;~ itemfzsd a8 r0110war (al "All OOUd COGtG, including co&e Of BerVlng process, in eny twit hereafter brought by or in behalf of any taxInS units for dollnqunnt taxec in w!iich suits all Gther Laxin(:units hcving a delinquent tax 0laiPi a&n such porarty of (or) an: part thereof, have'been lnzyleadod,(b) tw>ether -4th all expenses of foreolosure sale, (c) and such roarmable nttcmcy*s fees as may be incurred by the interpleader or Intervenlw taxIn& units, not exceedixv-tw par cent 1105) of the anmunt sued for, such attcmeys fees to br subjact to t!;eap;?rwal of the court, (d) together with such reasonable expensea a# the taxing units may Inour in procuringdata end inforamtlo NJ to the name identi.ty and loo&ion of neaeeoary ties, (e) and i.nptiurlng nea~safuy legal deaerlp tf- one oi the propbrty, ahall be ahergeablc as court ooeta.' Prior to the enaatment of the above quote4d'aoo- tion 0 of Artloli,9545b, "all oourt ooat@ tlmt oould be taxed agnlnetthe CeCendnnt in a sult.ofthis kind braught by the etate were those epe8Ifled ln krtlole 7SSe,.ae amelded; .The fees so spwlflsd Inoluded eaahand e?ery kind of oftlolal eervloerenderad by each at the afflaen In eald artlole. SeatIon 6 authorizeeadditional ooste w k ngslnnt the defendant, but all OS sucliaddltloaal areellowedtothetulng unitsmde pcrtlrdofew or that InterPam. In this eonneetion,it Will be tht the ettokneyJ'8 We, not to exowd ten per aat of the amount sued for, 18 ellared to the Impleed- lntsrrcwingtax unita, and not to the plaIntI.W. It Ie true .._~_ that Ar?AoleA~5b - _ Impotea - upon the Dlstriat clerkc’th* a4dltional burden of isstung olt~tlonm Sor eaoh taxlng.unltmade a party dettmdant which the sherift or constablemuet 8ervel but no ad&Ional ocmpen- 6ntlon has 'beenprwlded in said section SOT his eeRla0. Of uotu~a, if the lntereatedtaxlng units ere not made partl.eadefendant,end they intervene, no cltatiqnoM issued to nor aemed upon thmn. Some additional, but not burdeneome, dutlea are imoeed upon the County httmney. Fe nust either xaka all Eon. G. A. Xalters, ).iay 25, 1939, Page 9 other interested taxing units parties defendant or give them notice of the filing of the state's suit,by registered notice as provided in Section 2. In view of the plain language of all the sta- tutes pertinent to the subject and the established rules of law relating thereto, we conclude that the fees o$ the respective offloera named in the question stated are fixed by Artiole 7332, as amended; that Artiole 73455 allows no ad'dltlonalrecs to be oolleoted by the Mstriot Clerk; Sheriff, Constable or County Attorney, aa oompenaationfor any addltlmal service6 rendered and ocoassionedby said article. Bowever, it appears that where the state or oounty ia made a party defendant in e suit brought by mme other taxlhg unit, or ii not msde a party and it is neoeasary for the etate or ooontI to Intertens in the su~itand the oounty attoraq doe8 file a pled of intervintlonfor the state or oountI, he Is entitled to the attoxney*s $886 allowed on the percent- age basis provided ior in Seotion 6. In suah ah event, he rrouldnot be entitled to the fees provided ior in Artiale~7332,as amended.' The fees there provided for iilm are fo~bbrlngingthe suit, whf.le.theperoenakge Sees al- lawed .tohim in Seotlon 6 are for anawerlhgfor a befen- dant or ror interveningfor Me client, a taxiag uhit whhlchthe law makes it his duty to reprosent, The actual aervloea.rendevodare eubatantlallythe 8ama, the purpose against the taxpayer being to obtain a ,judguient dth a ' torealosureof lien on the property involved,yet it seem that the Legislature hae seen fit to diatlmish between the services rendered and prescribed a differentSee Sor eaoh service. Ae heretoforenoted,.the peraeatagefee 1s allowed to the impleaded or interveningtax unit, yet it Is speolflcallpauthorized to be aolleatedas vattorneI*s fees," and we believe a reasonable interpretationof the statute Is that the fee was intended to be given, when collected, to the attorney representing the taxing unit in the suit. Eon. C. ii.'~'alters, :.'ay 25, 1939, Page 10 we tiii;ive I!oplnr; Eiven you the infomatlon re- cuestod, w3 are Yours very truly