OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
Eonorablr R. I, Bladsoa
Countr Attornrr
Precmlo county
mrra, Ta~r
Dear sir,
a purahaser et-
reolosure 8~10,
0r dainquent in-
yerr redrmption period to
pr;;ro;,auoh land from ror- .
otter, prb110ntlngfor the cpinlon or thir
departsent $ho two qucrtlcas aborr rtcrtod,haa recalrea our
oareiul aonsideration, broauae we reoognize their great lm-
portanoe not only to the owaer or land 66eklng to re\lesmhi8
property fran tar sales but to thr State or TWM 88 no11
in it6 errort to sff*otlrely oollrot its ter rwenuer. through
the medium of rsuohtax sales.. Ii Art1010 7284a and Artiolr
72848, Vernon*8 Annotate6 Civil Statutes, govern the rademp-
Bonoreblr R. I..Bladaoa, Tuna 15, 1939, Pego e
tion rlghta oi tha owner, ha 18 raqulrod to pay to the
purohaaar at tha tax aala double tha amount paid by auoh
puroheaar, but ii, on tha other hand, Artlola 728s. ea
emended, Vernon*@ Annotated Cirll Stetutoa, la the oon-
trolling at8tuta in Noh oases, then the owner ham the
laaaar burden of pey'ingto thr purohasar et auoh tax
aal0 only the emount of money paid by auoh purchaser
plum 105 or auoh total Ii within tha rlrat year or tha
radamptlon period, and 20s it within the aacond yser or
tha radamptloa period; and, am regards tho revenuuI8 of
tha 6tat8, you point out In oonnaoticmwith your raoond
inquiry the axtrema raluctanoe of poaalbla purohaaara
to bid la property 0rramd at rorool08~ a&la r0r state,
oounty and lohool district terms for fsar that during the
rademptlon parlod tha atata school land involved will ba
rorrekitedror non-payment 0r dallnquant intersat theraon
dua the State, or that upon peyuant of 8uoh interast dur-
ing auoh rademptlon period to protaot tha property fraa
rorroiture, tha emount 0r Noh paymanta will be lost by
tha owner tandaring only the mount oi momy set out In
tha redemption atatataa.
The oonatltutlonal end statutory provision8
originally dsalgnad to protect property owners fran tax
Bales by affording them radamptlon rights proved entirely
lnadaqueta ror this purpose, end the oonstruotkn and llm-
itationa pleosd thorcon by our oourta worked much unraa-
aonebla 6lsorMnatlons and inaqualitlaaupon the tar pey-
ar that osrtaln emendamtna to the epplioebla conatitutlon-
al and rtatutory provision8 beam neoaasary.
Art1010 VIII, seotlon 13, Constitution or TSXES,
prior to its emandment Rwambar 8, 1932, provided em fol-
lows:
TrotIaIon~ahall be mada by tha
rirat Laglalstura for tha speedy solo
of a aurflolant portion or all lands
and othe+ property for the taxes dub
themon, and ersrjr par thareerter ror
the sale of (e) all land8 and other
'property,upon which the taxes heto not
been paid, and tha daod or oonreyenoo
to t&o purohaaar for all lends and other
property thus sold shall bo hald to rest
IIgood and perroot tltlm in tho purohaeor
thoreor, rublOOt to bo ,lmpaaohadonly ror
actual rraud; provided thet tho former
ownor shell, rlthin two.years frcnnd et0
Boaorablo R. I. Blodsoo, Juno 13, 1939, paga 3
of purohaaer*a dead, hato tho right
to redeem tho land upon tho payment
of double tho emouat oi ROIlOypaid .
for tha lead.*
In regard to tha rodomption of property frcoltex
aales, tho atatuto doolaretory of tho iongoing ooaatitu-
tlonal prori8lona was Art1010 7223, Rovlaad Civil Statutaa,
192s. whloh provldoa am fallor@:
.*Thaowaor of ram1 aatata mold
ror tho peymont or taxoa, or him
heirs or astlgna or loge1 ropraaaate-
tlvO8, may, within tuo years iraa tho
deto of @ala radoam tho oatato sold by
peyily or tondoring to the purohaaar,
him holra or logal ropraaantativaa,
doublo tha amount of moneypaid ror
tha land.’
Thi iorogoing oonatltutloneland statutory provl-
alona wore ooaatruod by our oourts to apply only to aum-
mery aalas mad0 by tex oolleotora rrom the tax roLla, and
not to sales made under forooloaura of tax llsna by oourt
judgcionta.Moroofar, Artlolo 7283, Rovlaed Civil Stetutes,
ebova quoted, was construed 90 apply only to aalea for taxes
duo tho atato, ocu;ltloa,and oltlaa, and not to aohool dls-
trlota or other taxing dlatrlota oraatod under tha laws of
the Sate. City Of Sea AntOnlO, vs. Barry, 92 Tar. 319, 42
S.V’.496; Collins, at ll. fs. Parguaon, at al., 22 Tox.
Cit. App. SS2, 56 S.B. 225; Brown vs. yidolity Inveatmont
Caapsaf, 280 S.F. 567.
To ODrrSOt thoso oonditlona the Lagl6leture, in
1927, oneotad Artlolaa 7284e and 7284b, Varnon~a Annotated
Clrll Stetutaa, uhloh provfdo, raapaotl~aly, am followr:
Whenever land la sold under a da-
oroo and;jub;gmantor court for taxes
levied by or for eny dl8trlot onganlaad
under tha laws or tho Steto of Taxes
with luthorlty to levy end oollaat tsxaa, *
tho owner of Nah property, or any ona
having an lntoraat therein, shall hat0
tho right to mdeam tha sama at any tima
within two yaers fran tho data Oi NOh
a810 upon payment or dcubla tha emouat
paid by the Furohaaer at Noh aalo; pro-
Honorable R. I. Bledsoe, J\ine1.3,1939, Pago 4
,
rided, that the pfroheser at Nah ion-
olosum aalo, end his eaal&na, shall not
bo entltlod to the poeaesaloa oi the prop-
lrty mold for taxes until tho oxpiratloa
0r two per8 rrom tha data 0r euoh amlo."
Wmnovor lend la aolh under a de-
orae and judgment of court for taxes
levied by or for the State, or by or for
any County within the Sta.e, tha ownar
or auoh property, or any one having en
interest thorela, shall have the rl&t
to ridaam tho aama at any tim4 within
two yeera frcatthe dete ot much male up-
oa payment of doqble the amount paid by
the purahaaor at such ears; provided
that the puroheaer et euoh forooloeure
sale, end his asslgna shell not bo oa-
titled to the poraoeafoa 01 the property
soid ror taxes until the oxplratloa or
two years fran the date of auoh male.*
Thereeftar, 00 November 0, 1992, an amendment to
Artiolo VIII, Seotloa 13, Conatltutlon of Texan, became ef-
fective to provide eo followor
Vrorlsloa ahejlkbe made by tho
rlrst Legl8laturo for the spoody aalo,
without the noooaalty of a suit in Ccurt,
or a aufrlcleatportion or all lands and
of&r propatty ror the texaa duo thereon,
mad every year thoreerter for tho sale in
like mannar of all leads and other prop-
arty upon whioh 'thetaxes have not been
paid; end the dood or oonreyenoo to the
purohaaer ror all lands mad other propsr-
ty thus sold shall bo held to teat a goad
an4 pe.r$eot.tltlo in tho purohssar them-
or, aubjbot to bo lmpeeohed only ror ao-
tuel fraud; provided, that the rormer
ownor shall within two yeera frua dato of
the filing for raoord Of the PurohaBor*a
mod have the rl&t to mdeooa the land a
on the tbllowlng beala:
*(l) Within tho,rlrat y&ar of tho
redemptloa period oppn tho peyment of
the amount or manor paid ror the land,
Honorablo R. I. Blod8oa, Sune 13, 1939, Page S
lnoludlng One ($1.00) Doller Tax Deed
Reoordlng Foe mad all taxes, ponaltles,
interest end oosta paid plus not exaeod-
fng twenty-flvo (25s) percent or the e&-
gmgeta total;
"(2) vilthlathe last year of the ro-
domptlon period upon the payment of the
amount or money paid for the land, la-
.cludlngCw ($1.00) Dollar Tax Dead Fie-
cording Fee end ell taxoa, penalties,
intarast and oobts peld plus not exoeed-
lng rlfty (30%) per oent or tho aggre-
gate total. (See. 13, Art. 8, adopted
olootloa Nov. 8, 1932.)"
In Opinion Ro. O-46 by this department under
date 0r January,7, 1939, to Honorable Morris ROlBtOn,
COunty AttO~ay Of Titus County it was held thet the
foregoing oonstltutlonalprovision wes not Self-OxaOUting
but merely dlreatod the Legislature to put certain laws
into eifoct, end that tho Laglalature had not complied
with the mandeto thereof to the affsot'that g,rOViEiOn6
should be made for tha speedy sale, without the necesalty
0r a suit in mm-t, 0r lends ror taxes thereon. However,
laesmuoh es the tax males upon whioh your laqulrles turn
larofre sales mede under e dac.roaand judment of court
ror stats, county, and common..sohooldlstrlot texes
rather than 8ummary aeler, we ere not ooncarned with this
question, but rather wlththo redomptloa fsetures or this
amehdment.
It la our thought that tha Leglaleturo oomplled
with tho redemption provlrloas of this oonstitutional
amendment by the amendment in 1933 of Artlola 7223, Re-
TiEed Civil StatUteS, a8 fOiiOW8:
'The mner or the real estate
sold for the payment of taxes, or
hi8 heir8 OF 88Ui@lS Or lOgEl ?X+,rs-
SCbntEtiVCbS,may, within two. (2)
years after tho date or riling for
record or the purcheaere deed, have
the right to rodeem the land on the
rollowing basla:
"(1) Hlthin the rirst year 0r
the redemption period upon the pey-
Honorable R. I. Bledroe, Juno 13, 1939, Pago 6
mat of tho amount or moneypaid for
the land, laoludlng Cae Dollar ($1.00)
tax dood rrcordlag for and allitaxea,
peneltloa, lateroat and oorta ther8ar-
ter paid thereon plum tea par cent
(10%) of the aggregate total.
"(2) Within the la8t year of the
redomptloa period upon tho payment of
tho emountof money paid ror the land,
laoludlng Cne Dollar ($1.00) tax doed
reoordlng re6 en4 all taxe8, ponaltlo8,
laterait end coats thorOefter pal4
thereon plum tltentyper oeat (20%) oi
tha aggregate total.
Vrovlded, that, tibjeot to tho
owner's right to redeem as aforesaid ,
any lion holder or party interastod
may within tho time above speolfled re-
deem 8ald property under the same pro-
vl8lona.
VOO. 2. This Act la intended to
apply to and govern the amount naoaa-
aery to be paid for redemption from all
state, County, munloipel and/or district
tax males 0r r*el e~tdta heretorors or
hereafter made regardless of the legal
method ueed in making such sales.
*Sec. 3. In addition to redeeming
dlroot from tha puroheser, redemption
may 8180 be medo em provided la Art10108
7204 and 7285 oi Xhe Revised Clrll Stat-
utes of Taxas of 1925. (Am amended ACtS
1933, 43rd Leg., let C.S., P. 91, ah.
31, EOO.~l.)"
Wo wish to @trees the language of Section 2 of
the foregoingamendment to Article 7223, Revised Civil
Statutes, applying tho terms end.condltlon8 thereof to
district tax salea of real eetato me well a8 ateta, county,
end munlolpal tax anlea, and also ambracing ln tax tiler,
regardless of the legal methods usad in making NCh aelea.
Wo think this language WIS designed to and does, in faot,
oorreot in all things tho llmitod oonetructlon placed upon
Article 7283, Revleed Civil Statutes, berore this amendment,
Hoaorablo R. 1. Blodsoe, &no 13, 1939, Pago 7
to tho ofreot that mama did not apply to lelea mado under
rOIWOlONm Of tax liens by 00Urt judgmnt, but 0alr to
summery sales, end, further, that tax 8elaa by 8ohool dla-
trlota and other taring dlatriota wera not ombrecod rlth-
in the aoope of auoh Artlole, but only taxaa 88108 far
atato oountJ, and olty taxes. This bolng the latest ex-
pression of the Legislature upon the Nbjoot, and bolng l
full, oompleta and adequata statute upon the aubjrot of
tax redemptloaq, end in aooordanco with tho oonatltutlonal
mandate.,it would seem to us that uador prlnofplea of atet-
utory construction too uoll oatabllshod to roqulro tho ol-
tetloa of euthori-ties,Artloloa 7284e and 7284b Vernon's
Annotated Clrll Statutes, would bo therobr lmpl~adly ro-
peeled, and Art1010 7283, es ewmdod in 1933, would be tho
oontrolllng atatuta upon the aubjeot. Th.iaooaolualoa la
atrengthoned by tho emerg6aoy olause of the Aot emendatory
of Artlole 7283, Revlaed Clrll Statutes, This oleuae re-
cites that %he'feOt that the cost of redaomlng land aold
.for taxes la 100s profit to the purchaser, and tho Cohetl-
tution now authoritem the L6glaleture to reduoe it, and
tho fact that it ought to be reduced speedily ror a long
needed release to the proparty owner, creates en emergency,*
e-to.
But we find that your first question la no longer
an open one la Texas, but 18 roreolosed by the oaeo 6r RLnk-
son fs. Lorenao Independent Sahool Dlatrlot, 109 S.K. (26)
1008. Horo this doalaion turned, in part, upon the thlld-
lty of a deoree end judgment foreclosing a tax lien ror
aerteln ladependant school dlatrlgt taxoa, end provided that
tho amlo thereunder should bo subjoot *to tha rights or tho
owner, or anyone having an lnteroet ln.tho land to rcdaom
it et any time within two yeara from the date of the a610
upon payment of double the amount paid by the purchaser et
the melo.' These proYlaioaa wer6 in keeping with the terms
of Artlole 72240, Rerisod Civil Statutes, 192S, but eppol-
lent oontended the,tthe Xudgmeat should hero decreed to him
the right to redeem his 16nd under the prc@elons of Art1016
7283, es amended by the Forty-third Legislature in 1933.
Upon this question the court spoke es rollowa:
Wo cannot eocedo to this Oonton- I
tlon. The old article 7223 mea a part
0r section 19 or the Act or 1876, 0.
lS2, p. 2S9, which deslt nlth aalos of
lead for taxes by the tax oollaotora
under summery process, and had no rerer-
enoe to sales made under judgments or
Bonolable R. I. Bl.d80+, Page 8 .
foraolosuroor tax liens. Yoreover,
that aot, Ilk8 ell other8 prior to th0
anaotmant 0r artlole 72Wa in 19$!7,had t
mfemnoa to sale8 for taxer due the atate,
obuntlsa, and oltlr8. Hone or thmt had
any mramnoe, In 80 ier aa the mettar or
radomptlonla aonoernad, to melee ot real
satate under ror00i08ur8 0r tpr liens awing
to nohool end other dlatriotaameted tidsr
the lewa or thr ateto. Tba aonlrtltutlonal
prov$aion ror auoh rademptlon, artiolr 8, \
aaation lS, applied only to ammew sale8
mede by tex aolleotora Srom the tar rolla
end not to .aaleamadr under roraaloeuro 0r
tax 11858 by court juagmanta. c1t.yor sari
MtOnlO f. Barry, 98 Tw. Sl9, 48 8.~. 496;
C011158